References
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
- Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463626
- Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–625). Princeton University Press.
- Baruch, A., May, A., & Yu, D. (2016). The motivations, enablers and barriers for voluntary participation in an online crowdsourcing platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 923–931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.039
- Bateman, P. J., Gray, P. H., & Butler, B. S. (2011). Research note – The impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 841–854. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0265
- Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00269
- Boh, W. F. (2014). Knowledge sharing in communities of practice: Examining usefulness of knowledge from discussion forums versus repositories. ACM Sigmis Database: the Database for Advances in Information Systems, 45(2), 8–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2621906.2621908
- Bouncken, R., & Barwinski, R. (2020). Shared digital identity and rich knowledge ties in global 3D printing—A drizzle in the clouds? Global Strategy Journal, 1–28.
- Brabham, D. C. (2012). Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing Application to improve Public engagement in transit planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.693940
- Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C. (2016). What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee) – exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002
- Budhathoki, N. R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Motivation for open collaboration: Crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 548–575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469364
- Burtch, G., Hong, Y., Bapna, R., & Griskevicius, V. (2018). Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Science, 64(5), 2065–2082. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2715
- Chen, J., Su, Y. S., de Jong, J. P. J., & von Hippel, E. (2020). Household sector innovation in China: Impacts of income and motivation. Research Policy, 49(4), 103931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103931
- Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
- Claussen, J., & Halbinger, M. A. (in press). The role of pre-innovation platform activity for diffusion success: Evidence from consumer innovations on a 3D printing platform. Research Policy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103943.
- Coleman, E., & Lieberman, Z. (2015). Contributor motivation in online knowledge sharing communities with reputation management systems. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Research Conference on South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (pp. 1–12).
- Daniel, F., Kucherbaev, P., Cappiello, C., Benatallah, B., & Allahbakhsh, M. (2018). Quality control in crowdsourcing: A survey of quality attributes, assessment techniques, and assurance actions. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3148148
- de Jong, J. P. J. (2016). The empirical scope of user innovation. In D. Harhoff & K. Lakhani, Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities and open innovation (pp. 67–87). MIT Press.
- de Jong, J. P. J., & de Bruijn, E. (2013). Innovation lessons from 3-D printing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54, 2. Winter, 43-52.
- de Jong, J. P. J., Gillert, N. L., & Stock, R. M. (2018). First adoption of consumer innovations: Exploring market failure and alleviating factors. Research Policy, 47(2), 487–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.004
- de Jong, J. P. J., von Hippel, E., Gault, F., Kuusisto, J., & Raasch, C. (2015). Market failure in the diffusion of consumer-developed innovations: Patterns in Finland. Research Policy, 44(10), 1856–1865. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.015
- Ergün, E., & Avci, U. (2018). Knowledge sharing self-efficacy, motivation and sense of community as predictors of knowledge receiving and giving behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 60–73.
- Gallus, J. (2017). Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Science, 63(12), 3999–4015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2540
- Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351328
- Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2002). Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(3), 25–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2002.11044241
- Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Understanding seeking from electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 1156–1166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20219
- Kim, Y. (2015). Consumer user innovation in Korea: An international comparison and policy implications. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2015.1015672
- Kuang, L., Huang, N., Hong, Y., & Yan, Z. (2019). Spillover effects of financial incentives on non-incentivized user engagement: Evidence from an online knowledge exchange platform. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 289–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1550564
- Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2005). Why hackers do what they do. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. A. Hissam, & K. R. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software (pp. 3–21). MIT Press.
- Ma, W. W., & Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 51–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.015
- Ma, W. W., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Understanding online knowledge sharing: An interpersonal relationship perspective. Computers & Education, 56(1), 210–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.004
- Mancilla-Amaya, L., Sanin, C., & Szczerbicki, E. (2010). Smart knowledge-sharing platform for e-decisional community. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 41(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01969720903408730
- McLure Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2000). ‘It is what one does’: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 155–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7
- Michaelson, D., & Stacks, D. W. (2011). Standardization in public relations measurement and evaluation. Public Relations Journal, 5(2), 1–22.
- Moilanen, J., Daly, A., Lobato, R., & Allen, D. W. (2014). Cultures of sharing in 3D printing: what can we learn from the licence choices of Thingiverse users? https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2440027.
- Nielsen, K. R., Reisch, L. A., & Thøgersen, J. (2016). Sustainable user innovation from a policy perspective: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 65–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.092
- Novak, J. I. (2019). Self-directed learning in the age of open source, open hardware and 3D printing. In I. G. I. Global (Ed.), Ubiquitous inclusive learning in a digital era (pp. 154–178.
- Ogawa, S., & Pongtanalert, K. (2013). Exploring characteristics and motives of consumer innovators: Community innovators vs. Independent innovators. Research-Technology Management, 56(3), 41–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5603088
- Oliveira, P., Zejnilovic, L., Canhão, H., & von Hippel, E. (2015). Innovation by patients with rare diseases and chronic needs. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0257-2
- Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2009). Usability and sociability in online communities: A comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(10), 721–747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00210
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
- Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 209–269.
- Stanko, M. A. (2016). Toward a theory of remixing in online innovation communities. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 773–791. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0650
- Swann, W. B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on the self, Vol (pp. 2). Erlbaum. 33-66.
- Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). Academic Press.
- Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader, 56, 65.
- Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005
- Tsipouri, L., Reid, A., & Miedzinski, M. (2008). European Innovation Progress Report 2008, European Commission: DG Enterprise and Industry.
- von Hippel, E. (2017). Free innovation. MIT Press: Cambridge.
- West, J., & Kuk, G. (2016). The complementarity of openness: How MakerBot leveraged thingiverse in 3D printing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 169–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.025
- Yan, B., & Jian, L. (2017). Beyond reciprocity: The bystander effect of knowledge response in online knowledge communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 9–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.040
- Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53(5), 643–653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001