Navigating an emerging innovation ecosystem: a case study of fuel cell innovation in Taiwan

References

• Aaboen, L., Laage-Hellman, J., Lind, F., Öberg, C., & Shih, T. (2016). Exploring the roles of university spin-offs in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard. (2016). Ballard closes sale of methanol telecom backup power business to CHEM for up to $6.1 million. https://www.ballard.com/about-ballard/newsroom/news-releases/2016/05/31/ballard-closes-sale-of-methanol-telecom-backup-power-business-to-chem-for-up-to-$6.1-million.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Zheng, G. (2023). Market insights exploration and product technology build-up: Latecomer firms’ catch-up strategies. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2023.2216723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, J., Hu, M., & Shih, T. (2019). Green transformation: Lessons from the fuel cell innovation system in Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., & Bruneel, J. (2007). Nurturing and growing innovative start-ups: The role of policy as integrator. R&D Management, 37(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466–498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lesson from Japan. Pinter Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., & Sun, S. (2023). How do latecomer firms achieve disruptive innovation? A business ecosystem perspective. International Studies of Management & Organization, 53(3), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2023.2246711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M., & Negro, S. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M.-C., Kang, J.-S., & Wu, C.-Y. (2017). Determinants of profiting from innovation activities: Comparisons between technological leaders and latecomers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Intarakumnerd, P. (2019). Alternative technological learning paths of Taiwanese firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 27(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2019.1678390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S.-C., & Whittington, R. (2011). Agency in national innovation systems: Institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy, 40(4), 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieft, A., Harmsen, R., & Hekkert, M. (2020). Toward ranking interventions for technological innovation systems via the concept of leverage points. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laage-Hellman, J., Lind, F., Öberg, C., & Shih, T. (2020). Interactions between university spin-offs and academia: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(12), 1941–1955. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2019-0380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lema, R., Fu, X., & Rabellotti, R. (2020). Green windows of opportunity: Latecomer development in the age of transformation toward sustainability. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(5), 1193–1209. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaa044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linné, Å, & Shih, T. (2013). The political embeddedness of business networks in a Chinese context: The case of a biopharmaceutical business network. IMP Journal, 7, 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Wu, W., & Kim, Y. (2023). How do latecomer firms achieve catch-up through technology management: A comparative analysis. Humanities and Social Science Communications, 10(1), 561. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02003-3
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B-Å. (2007). National innovation systems - analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, C. (2012). Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2007). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 573–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. A., Hu, M. C., & Wu, C. Y. (2011). Fast-follower industrial dynamics: The case of Taiwan's emergent solar photovoltaic industry. Industry and Innovation, 18(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.541104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2016). White paper of energy industry and technologies (In Chinese). Bureau of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs. (n.d.). Stationary fuel cell power generation system subsidy program. https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/english/content/Content.aspx?menu_id=8714.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, M. (2013). Varieties of innovation systems: The governance of knowledge transfer in Europe. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papaefthymiou, G., & Dragoon, K. (2016). Towards 100% renewable energy systems: Uncapping power system flexibility. Energy Policy, 92, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegels, A., & Altenburg, T. (2020). Latecomer development in a “greening” world: Introduction to the special issue. World Developmjent, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubens, N., Still, K., Huhtamäki, J., & Russell, M. G. (2011). A network analysis of investment firms as resource routers in Chinese innovation ecosystem. Journal of Software, 6(9), 1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.6.9.1737-1745
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Smorodinskaya, N. (2018). Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. W., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded case study methods integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, T., & Aaboen, L. (2019). The network mediation of an incubator: How does it enable or constrain the development of incubator firms’ business networks? Industrial Marketing Management, 80, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, T., & Linné, Å. (2016). State actors’ mobilisation of innovation: The Chinese state-business nexus and the development and commercialisation of a vaccine. The IMP Journal, 10(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMP-08-2015-0044
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Still, K., Huhtamäki, J., Russell, M. G., & Rubens, N. (2014). Insights for orchestrating innovation ecosystems: The case of EIT ICT labs and data-driven network visualisations. International Journal of Technology Management, 66(2/3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2014.064606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, K., & Liao, Y. (2017). Innovation capacity and the implementation of eco-innovation: Toward a contingency perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K., Georges, A., Romme, L., & Verbong, G. (2018). A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waluszewski, A., Baraldi, E., Shih, T., & Linné, Å. (2009). Resource interfaces telling other stories about the commercial use of new technology: The embedding of biotech solutions in US, China and Taiwan. IMP Journal, 3, 86–123.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Wang, H., & Fan, Y. (2018). Techno-economic challenges of fuel cell commercialization. Engineering, 4(3), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, J., Zhao, S., Meng, Y., Xu, L., & Kim, S. (2022). How latecomers catch up to build an energy-saving industry: The case of the Chinese electric vehicle industry 1995–2018. Energy Policy, 161, 112725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Shi, Y., & Wu, X. (2010). Latecomer strategy to catch-up: The implications from Taiwan’s TFT-LCD manufacturing industry. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(3), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/17585521011083120
   Google Scholar