A hydrodynamic optimization design methodology for a ship bulbous bow under multiple operating conditions

References

• Abt, C., Harries, S., Heimann, J., & Winter, H. (2003). From redesign to optimal hull line by means of parametric modeling. 2nd International on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Marine Industries (COMPIT 2003), Hamburg, Germany, 444–458.
   Google Scholar
• Birk, L., & Harries, S. (Eds.). (2003). OPTIMISTIC—optimization in marine design. Berlin: Mensch & Buch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Campana, E.F., Peri, D., Tahara, Y., & Stern, F. (2006). Shape optimization in ship hydrodynamics using computational fluid dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196, 634–651.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, K. W., & Wu, C. L. (2010). A hybrid model coupled with singular spectrum analysis for daily rainfall prediction. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 12(4), 458–473.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. F., & Huang, C. H. (2004). An inverse hull design approach in minimizing the ship wave. Ocean Engineering, 1, 1683–1712.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H. J., Park, D. W., & Choi, M. S. (2015). Study on optimized hull form of basic ships using optimization algorithm. Journal of Marine Science and Technology – Taiwan, 23(1), 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., & Meyarivan, T. (2000). A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. Lecture notes in computer science, 1917, 849–858.
   Google Scholar
• Dejhalla, R., Mrsa, Z., & Vukovic, S. (2002). A genetic algorithm approach to minimum ship wave resistance problem. Marine Technology, 39(3), 187–195.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoropoulos, G. J., & Chalkias, D. S. (2010). Hull-form optimization in calm and rough water. Journal of Computer-Aided Design, 42(11), 977–984.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoropoulos, G. J., Chalkias, D. S., & Tikkos, C. (2004). Multi-objective hull form optimization of high-speed vessels. In V. Beltram (Ed.), HIPER '04 (pp. 264–276). Rome: INSEAN.
   Google Scholar
• Harries, S. (1998). Parametric design and hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut fur Schiffs-und Meerestechnik, Technische Universitat Berlin, Germany; Berlin: Mensch & Buch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harries, S. (2007). Friendship systems: Hydrodynamic optimization of the DSME 60 K LPG Carrier, FS-Report 175–02-01.
   Google Scholar
• Harries, S., & Abt, C. (1998). Parametric curve design applying fairness criteria. In: International Workshop on Creating Fair and Shape-Preserving Curves and Surfaces. Berlin: Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S., Abt, C., & Hochkirch, K. (2004). Constraint management for marine design applications. In: International symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structures (PRADS 2004), Lübeck-Travemünde, Germany, September 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Harries, S., Valdenazzi, F., Abt, C., & Viviani, U. (2001). Investigation on optimization strategies for the hydrodynamic design of fast ferries, FAST’01, Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Hinatsu, M. (2004). Fourier NUBS method to express ship hull form. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 9, 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J. Y., & Lee, B. S. (2010). Mesh-based morphing method for rapid hull form generation. Comput Aided Des, 42, 970–976.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Yang, C. (2010). A new surface modification approach for CFD-based hull form optimization. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(5), 520–525.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. (2003). Trends validation of CFD predictions for ship design purpose. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut fur Schiffs-und Meerestechnik, Technische Universitat Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S., Kim, S. Y., & Kang, K. T. (1995). Hull form generation by using TSK fuzzy model. Fuzzy logic and its application, information science and intelligence systems.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., Cheng, X. Q., Li, Z. N., & Xiang, J. W. (2011). Robust multi-objective wing design optimization via CFD approximation model. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 5(2), 286–300.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M. C., Si, Q., Liang, S. X., & Sun, Z. C. (2014). Multiple objectives for genetically optimized coupled inversion method for jet models in flowing ambient fluid. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 8(1), 82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, T. W., & Steel, J. (2003). Conceptual hull design using a genetic algorithm. Journal of Ship Research, 47(3), 222–236.
   Google Scholar
• Maisonneuve, J. J., Harries, S., Marzi, J., Raven, H. C., Viviani, U., & Piippo, H. (2003). Toward optimal design of ship hull shapes. In: 8th international marine design conference, IMDC03, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso, A. (2006). Parametric design of sailing hull shapes. Ocean Engineering, 33, 234–246.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacki, H., & Kaklis, P. D. (Eds.). (1998). Creating FAIR and SHAPE preserving curves and surfaces. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, F., & Clemente, J. A. (2011). Constrained design of simple ship hulls with B-spline surfaces. Computer-Aided Design, 43, 1829–1840.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, F., Suárez, J. A., Clemente, J. A., & Souto, A. (2007). Geometric modeling of bulbous bows with the use of non-uniform rational B-Spline surfaces. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 12, 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, F., Suárez-Suárez, J. A., & Fernández-Jambrina, L. (2006). Automatic surface modeling of a ship hull. Computer-Aided Design, 38, 584–594.
   Google Scholar
• Peri, D., Rossetti, M., & Campana, E. F. (2001). Design optimization of ship hulls via CFD techniques. Journal of Ship Research, 45(2), 140–149.
   Google Scholar
• Ping, Z., Xiang, Z. D., & Hao, L. W. (2008). Parametric approach to design of hull forms. J Hydrodyn, 20(6), 804–810.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, G. K., Suzuki, K., & Kai, H. (2004). Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms in shallow water. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 9, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, G. K., Suzuki, K., & Kai, H. (2005) Hydrodynamic optimization of a catamaran hull with large bow and stern bulbs installed on the center plane of the catamaran. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 10, 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sarioz, E. (2006). An optimization approach for fairing of ship hull forms. Ocean Engineering, 33(16), 2105–2118.
   Google Scholar
• Shereena, S. G., Vengadesan, S., Idichandy, V. G., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2013). CFD study of drag reduction in axisymmetric underwater vehicles using air jets. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 7(2), 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, N., & Deb, K. (1994). Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary computation, 2(3), 221–248.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., Kai, H., & Kashiwabara, S. (2005). Studies on the optimization of stern hull-form based on a potential flow solver. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 10(2), 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Tahara, Y., Peri, D., Campana, E. F., & Stern, F. (2008). Computational fluid dynamics-based multiobjective optimization of a surface combatant using a global optimization method. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 13 (2), 95–16.
   Google Scholar
• Tahara, Y., Stern, F., & Himeno, Y. (2004). Computational fluid dynamics based optimization of a surface combatant. Journal of Ship Research, 28(4), 273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Tahara, Y., Wilson, R. V., Carrica, P. M., & Stern, F. (2006). RANS simulation of a container ship using a single-phase level-set method with overset grids and the prognosis for extension to a self-propulsion simulator. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 11, 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Taormina, R., & Chau, K. W. (2015). Data-driven input variable selection for rainfall–runoff modeling using binary-coded particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machines. Journal of Hydrology, 529, 1617–1632.
   Google Scholar
• Valdenazzi, F., Harries, S., Viviani, U., & Abt, C. (2002). Seakeeping optimisation of fast vessels by means of parametric modeling, HSMV02, Naples.
   Google Scholar
• Valorani, M., Peri, D., & Campana, E. F. (2003). Sensitivity analysis techniques for design optimization ship hulls. Optimization and Engineering, 4(4), 337–364.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. C., Chau, K. W., Xu, D. M., & Chen, X. Y. (2015). Improving forecasting accuracy of annual runoff time series using ARIMA based on EEMD decomposition. Water Resources Management, 29(8), 2655–2675.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. L., Chau, K. W., & Li, Y. S. (2009). Methods to improve neural network performance in daily flows prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 372(1), 80–93.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Fuxin, H., & Kim, H. (2015). Hydrodynamic optimization of a triswach. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 26(6), 856–864.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Fuxin, H., & Noblesse, F. (2013). Practical evaluation of the drag of a ship for design and optimization. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 25(5), 645–654.
   Google Scholar
• Yasukawa, H. (2000). Ship form improvement using genetic algorithm. Ship Technology Research, 47(1), 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B. J. (2012). Research on optimization of hull lines for minimum resistance based on Rankine source method. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(1), 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B. J., Kun, M., & Ji, Z. S. (2009). The optimization of the hull form with the minimum wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 21(2), 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Chau, K. W. (2009). Multilayer ensemble pruning via novel multi-sub-swarm particle swarm optimization. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 15(4), 840–858.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., & Chau, K. W. (2009). Dimension reduction using semi-supervised locally linear embedding for plant leaf classification. In Emerging intelligent computing technology and applications. Berlin: Springer, 949–955.
   Google Scholar