Numerical investigation of flow in a vertical pipe inlet/outlet with a horizontal anti-vortex plate: effect of diversion orifices height and divergence angle

References

• Aloui, F., Berrich, E., & Pierrat, D. (2011). Experimental and numerical investigations of a turbulent flow behavior in isolated and nonisolated conical diffusers. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 133, 011201. doi: 10.1115/1.4003236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansys Fluent. (2015). User’s and theory guide. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Booij, R. (2003). Measurements and large eddy simulations of the flows in some curved flumes. Journal of Turbulence, 4. doi: 10.1088/1468-5248/4/1/008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, K. W., & Jiang, Y. W. (2001). 3D numerical model for pearl river estuary. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(1), 72–82. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:1(72)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, K. W., & Jiang, Y. W. (2004). A threedimensional pollutant transport model in orthogonal curvilinear and sigma coordinate system for pearl river estuary. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 21(2), 188–198. doi: 10.1504/IJEP.2004.004185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-l., Wu, C., Ye, M., & Ju, X.-m. (2007). Hydraulic characteristics of vertical vortex at hydraulic intakes. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 19(2), 143–149. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(07)60040-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Ettema, R., & Lai, Y. (2004). Ice-tank and numerical study of frazil ingestion by submerged intakes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(2), 101–111. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:2(101)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echávez, G., & McCann, E. (2002). An experimental study on the free surface vertical vortex. Experiments in Fluids, 33(3), 414–421. doi: 10.1007/s00348-002-0463-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Behery, S. M., & Hamed, M. H. (2011). A comparative study of turbulence models performance for separating flow in a planar asymmetric diffuser. Computers & Fluids, 44, 248–257. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowda, B. H. L., Joshy, P. J., & Swarnamani, S. (1996). Device to suppress vortexing during draining from cylindrical tanks. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 33(4), 598–600. doi: 10.2514/3.26806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowda, B. H. L., & Udhayakumar, H. (2005). Vane-type suppressor to prevent vortexing during draining from cylindrical tanks. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 42(2), 381–383. doi: 10.2514/1.8624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greifzu, F., Kratzsch, C., Forgber, T., Lindner, F., & Schwarze, R. (2016). Assessment of particle-tracking models for dispersed particle-laden flows implemented in OpenFOAM and ANSYS FLUENT. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 10(1), 30–43. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2015.1104266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, S., Kara, M. C., Stoesser, T., & Sturm, T. W. (2015). Free-Surface versus rigid-Lid LES computations for bridge-abutment flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 141(9), 04015019. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. E., & Choudhury, D. (1995). A near-wall treatment using wall functions sensitized to pressure gradient. Separated and Complex Flows, 217, 273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Kocabas, F., & Unal, S. (2010). Compared techniques for the critical submergence of an intake in water flow. Advances in Engineering Software, 41(5), 802–809. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocabaş, F., Ünal, S., & Ünal, B. (2008). A neural network approach for prediction of critical submergence of an intake in still water and open channel flow for permeable and impermeable bottom. Computers & Fluids, 37(8), 1040–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Jang, S. J., & Sung, H. J. (2012). Direct numerical simulations of turbulent flow in a conical diffuser. Journal of Turbulence, 13, 1–29. doi: 10.1080/14685248.2011.633522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H.-f., Chen, H.-x., Ma, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2009). Formation and influencing factors of free surface vortex in a barrel with a central orifice at bottom. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 21(2), 238–244. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60141-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahyari, M. N., Karimi, H., Naseh, H., & Mirshams, M. (2010). Numerical and experimental investigation of vortex breaker effectiveness on the improvement in launch vehicle ballistic parameters. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 24(10), 1997–2006. doi: 10.1007/s12206-010-0618-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott, M. J., & Jayaratne, R. (2010). Hydraulic roughness – links between Manning’s coefficient, Nikuradse’s equivalent sand roughness and bed grain size. Proceedings of Advances in Computing and Technology, (AC&T) The School of Computing and Technology 5th Annual Conference, University of East London, pp. 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598–1605. doi: 10.2514/3.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizuki, S., Gowda, B. H. L., & Uchibaba, T. (2003). Visualization studies using PIV in a cylindrical tank with and without vortex suppressor. Journal of Visualization, 6(4), 337–342. doi: 10.1007/BF03181740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabavi, M. (2010). Three-dimensional asymmetric flow through a planar diffuser: Effects of divergence angle, Reynolds number and aspect ratio. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 37, 17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderi, V., Farsadizadeh, D., Hosseinzadeh Dalir, A., & Arvanaghi, H. (2014). Effect of using vertical plates on vertical intake on discharge coefficient. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39(12), 8627–8633. doi: 10.1007/s13369-014-1468-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberkampf, W. L., & Trucano, T. G. (2002). Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(3), 209–272. doi: 10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan, F., Wenka, A., Hansjosten, E., Pfeifer, P., & Kraushaar-Czarnetzki, B. (2016). Numerical investigation of interfacial mass transfer in two phase flows using the VOF method. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 10(1), 100–110. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2015.1061555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Díaz, J. I., Chazarra, M., García-González, J., Cavazzini, G., & Stoppato, A. (2015). Trends and challenges in the operation of pumped-storage hydropower plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 767–784. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkardeh, H., Reza Zarrati, A., Jabbari, E., & Marosi, M. (2014). Numerical simulation and analysis of flow in a reservoir in the presence of vortex. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 8(4), 598–608. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2014.11083310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvam, K., Peixinho, J., & Willis, A. P. (2015). Localised turbulence in a circular pipe flow with gradual expansion. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 771, 123. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, T.-H., Liou, W. W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., & Zhu, J. (1995). A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 24(3), 227–238. doi: 10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. H., Ju, M. G., & Gowda, B. H. L. (2009). Draining from cylindrical tanks with vane-type suppressors - A PIV study. Journal of Visualization, 12(4), 347–360. doi: 10.1007/BF03181878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, E. M., Abraham, J. P., & Minkowycz, W. J. (2009). Flow separation in a diverging conical duct: Effect of Reynolds number and divergence angle. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 52(13), 3079–3083. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balen, W., Uijttewaal, W. S. J., & Blanckaert, K. (2009). Large-eddy simulation of a mildly curved open-channel flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 630, 413. doi: 10.1017/S0022112009007277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Balen, W., Uijttewaal, W. S. J., & Blanckaert, K. (2010). Large-eddy simulation of a curved open-channel flow over topography. Physics of Fluids, 22(7), 075108. doi: 10.1063/1.3459152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, F. M. (2011). Fluid mechanics (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. L., & Chau, K. W. (2006). Mathematical model of water quality rehabilitation with rainwater utilization — a case study at Haigang. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 28(3–4), 534–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2006.011227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, J., & Jin, Y.-C. (2016). Parameter determination for the cross rheology equation and its application to modeling non-Newtonian flows using the WC-MPS method. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 10(1), 111–129. doi: 10.1080/19942060.2015.1104267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Liu, T., Bottacin-Busolin, A., & Lin, C. (2014). Effects of intake-entrance profiles on free-surface vortices. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 52(4), 523–531. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2014.905504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, F., & Gao, X.-p. (2011). Numerical simulations of the hydraulic characteristics of side inlet/outlets. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 23(1), 48–54. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60087-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar