Numerical simulation of wind turbulence by DSRFG and identification of the aerodynamic admittance of bridge decks

References

• Aboshosha, H., Elshaer, A., Bitsuamlak, G. T., & El Damatty, A. (2015). Consistent inflow turbulence generator for LES evaluation of wind-induced responses for tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 142, 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batten, P., Goldberg, U., & Chakravarthy, S. (2004). Interfacing statistical turbulence closures with large-eddy simulation. AIAA Journal, 42(3), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.3496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, L., Tubino, F., & Solari, G. (2005). Aerodynamic admittance functions of bridge deck sections by CWE. Proc., EURODYN.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, H. G., & Paz, R. R. (2013). A time and space correlated turbulence synthesis method for large eddy simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 235, 742–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Ge, Y. J., & Xiang, H. F. (2009). Aerodynamic admittance identification for non-streamline section by method of zero-sparation. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 37(22), 155–158. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. Y., Wang, B., Zhu, L. D., & Li, Y. L. (2018). Numerical study on surface distributed vortex-induced force on a flat-steel-box girder. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2017.1337593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, A. G. (1962). Buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE,, 88(3), 233–268.
   Google Scholar
• Dhamankar, N. S., Blaisdell, G. A., & Lyrintzis, A. S. (2018). Overview of turbulent inflow boundary conditions for large-eddy simulations. AIAA Journal, 56(4), 1317–1334. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana, G., Bruni, S., Cigada, A., & Zappa, E. (2002). Complex aerodynamic admittance function role in buffeting response of a bridge deck. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 90(12–15), 2057–2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00321-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferziger, J. H., & Peric, M. (2002). Computational methods for fluid dynamics. (3rd ed.) Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flay, R. G. J., & Stevenson, D. C. (1988). Integral length scales in strong winds below 20 m. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 28(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(88)90098-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghalandari, M., Shamshirband, S., Mosavi, A., & Chau, K.-w. (2019). Flutter speed estimation using presented differential quadrature method formulation. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 804–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1627676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, M., & Qin, X. R. (2004). Direct identification of flutter derivatives and aerodynamic admittances of bridge decks. Engineering Structures, 26(14), 2161–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., Chen, Z. Q., & Hua, X. G. (2010). New estimation methodology of six complex aerodynamic admittance functions. Wind and Structures An International Journal, 13(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.3.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hejlesen, M. M., Rasmussen, J. T., Larsen, A., & Walther, J. H. (2015). On estimating the aerodynamic admittance of bridge sections by a mesh-free vortex method. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 146, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hémon, P., & Santi, F. (2007). Simulation of a spatially correlated turbulent velocity field using biorthogonal decomposition. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshiya, M. (1972). Simulation of multi-correlated random processes and application to structural vibration problems. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1972(204), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej1969.1972.121
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. H., Li, Q. S., & Wu, J. R. (2010). A general inflow turbulence generator for large eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 98(10–11), 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, K., Murakami, S., & Mochida, A. (1997). Generation of velocity fluctuations for inflow boundary condition of LES. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 67-68, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00062-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraichnan, R. H. (1970). Diffusion by a random velocity field. Physics of Fluids, 13(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1692799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larose, G. L. (1992). The response of a suspension bridge deck to the turbulent wind: The taut-strip model approach. The University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Larose, G. L. (1999). Experimental determination of the aerodynamic admttance of a bridge deck segment. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 13(7–8), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larose, G. L., & Mann, J. (1998). Gust loading on streamlined bridge decks. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 12(5), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1998.0161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, A. (1993). Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the Great Belt. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 48(2–3), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90141-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Tong, L., Wu, J., & Pan, Y. (2019). Numerical investigation of wind influences on photovoltaic arrays mounted on roof. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1653375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. (2007). Study on aerodynamic admittance function of bridge and it's application (Ph.D. Ph.D.). Southwest Jiaotong University.
   Google Scholar
• Liepmann, H. (1952). On the application of statistical concepts to the buffeting problem. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences (Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences), 19(12), 793–800. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2491
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Li, J., Bu, W., Ma, W., Shen, G., & Yuan, Z. (2018). Large eddy simulation for improvement of performance estimation and turbulent flow analysis in a hydrodynamic torque converter. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12(1), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1489896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, C. M., Wang, J. X., Li, Q. S., & Liao, H. L. (2019). 3D aerodynamic admittances of streamlined box bridge decks. Engineering Structures, 179, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, K., Hikami, Y., Fujiwara, T., & Moriyama, A. (1999). Aerodynamic admittance and the `strip theory’ for horizontal buffeting forces on a bridge deck. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 83(1–3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00083-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou, B., He, B.-J., Zhao, D.-X., & Chau, K.-w. (2017). Numerical simulation of the effects of building dimensional variation on wind pressure distribution. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 11(1), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2017.1281845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naimul Haque, M., Katsuchi, H., Yamada, H., & Nishio, M. (2014). Investigation of flow fields around rectangular cylinder under turbulent flow by Les. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 8(3), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2014.11015524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patruno, L., & Ricci, M. (2017). On the generation of synthetic divergence-free homogeneous anisotropic turbulence. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 315, 396–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. T., Hejlesen, M. M., Larsen, A., & Walther, J. H. (2010). Discrete vortex method simulations of the aerodynamic admittance in bridge aerodynamics. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 98(12), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salih, S. Q., Aldlemy, M. S., Rasani, M. R., Ariffin, A. K., Ya, T. M. Y. S. T., Al-Ansari, N., Yaseen, Z. M., & Chau, K.-W. (2019). Thin and sharp edges bodies-fluid interaction simulation using cut-cell immersed boundary method. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13(1), 860–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2019.1652209
   Google Scholar
• Sears, W. R. (1941). Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 8(3), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.10655
   Google Scholar
• Simiu, E., & Scanlan, R. H. (1996). Wind effects on structures—fundamentals and applications to design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov, A., Shi, S., & Celik, I. (2001). Random flow generation technique for large eddy simulations and particle-dynamics modeling. Journal of Fluids Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 123(2), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1369598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solari, G., & Piccardo, G. (2001). Probabilistic 3-D turbulence modeling for gust buffeting of structures. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 16(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(00)00010-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor, G. R., & Baba-Ahmadi, M. H. (2010). Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: A review. Computers & Fluids, 39(4), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tominaga, Y., Mochida, A., Yoshie, R., Kataoka, H., Nozu, T., Yoshikawa, M., & Shirasawa, T. (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(10–11), 1749–1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uejima, H., Kuroda, S., & Kobayashi, H. (2008). Estimation of aerodynamic admittance by numerical computation. BBAA VI Interna-tional Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Appliea tions, Milano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., & Ge, Y. J. (2015). Cross-spectral recognition method of bridge deck aerodynamic admittance function. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(4), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0048-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, L. D., Zhou, Q., Ding, Q. S., & Xu, Z. R. (2018). Identification and application of six-component aerodynamic admittance functions of a closed-box bridge deck. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 172, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z. W., Chen, W., & Yuan, T. (2016). Pressure measurement and aerodynamics investigation on benchmark model of bridge girder for CFD simulations. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 29(11), 49–56. (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2016.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., Gu, M., & Chen, Z. (2007). Wind tunnel and CFD study on identification of flutter derivatives of a long-span self-anchored suspension bridge. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22(8), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00509.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar