Antimicrobial peptide GH12 targets Streptococcus mutans to arrest caries development in rats

References

• Takahashi N, Nyvad B. The role of bacteria in the caries process: ecological perspectives. J Dent Res. 2011;90(3):294–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilian M. The oral microbiome - friend or foe? Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126(Suppl 1):5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo H, Bowen WH. Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans: a potential synergistic alliance to cause virulent tooth decay in children. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(12):1295–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon-Soro A, Guillen-Navarro M, Mira A. Metatranscriptomics reveals overall active bacterial composition in caries lesions. J Oral Microbiol. 2014;6:25443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Jiang S, Koh D, et al. Salivary biomarkers for dental caries. Periodontol 2000. 2016;70(1):128–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chokshi A, Mahesh P, Sharada P, et al. A correlative study of the levels of salivary Streptococcus mutans, lactobacilli and Actinomyces with dental caries experience in subjects with mixed and permanent dentition. J Oral Maxill Pathol. 2016;20(1):25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Huo LJ, Huang XY, Ling JQ, et al. Selective activities of STAMPs against Streptococcus mutans. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(2):1886–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonagh MS, Whiting PF, Wilson PM, et al. Systematic review of water fluoridation. BMJ. 2000;321(7265):855–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate JM, Zaura E. The numerous microbial species in oral biofilms: how could antibacterial therapy be effective? Adv Dent Res. 2012;24(2):108–111.
   Google Scholar
• Oh HJ, Oh HW, Lee DW, et al. Chronologic trends in studies on fluoride mechanisms of action. J Dent Res. 2017;96(12):1353–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susheela AK. Fluorosis and iodine deficiency disorders in India. Current Sci. 2018;115(5):860–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo H, Chen L, Kong M, et al. Toxic effects of fluoride on organisms. Life Sci. 2018;198:18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai S, Mauger MT, Niu L-N, et al. Potential applications of antimicrobial peptides and their mimics in combating caries and pulpal infections. Acta Biomater. 2017;49:16–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreling PF, Aida KL, Massunari L, et al. Cytotoxicity and the effect of cationic peptide fragments against cariogenic bacteria under planktonic and biofilm conditions. Biofouling. 2016;32(9):995–1006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taniguchi M, Ochiai A, Takahashi K, et al. Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of action of a novel cationic α-helical octadecapeptide derived from α-amylase of rice. Biopolymers. 2015;104(2):73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Wei W, Sun Y, et al. Pleurocidin congeners demonstrate activity against Streptococcus and low toxicity on gingival fibroblasts. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;70:79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn KB, Kim AR, Kum K-Y, et al. The synthetic human beta-defensin-3 C15 peptide exhibits antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans, both alone and in combination with dental disinfectants. J Microbiol. 2017;55(10):830–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilhelmelli F, Vilela N, Albuquerque P, et al. Antibiotic development challenges: the various mechanisms of action of antimicrobial peptides and of bacterial resistance. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fan Y, Zhou Z, et al. De novo synthetic short antimicrobial peptides against cariogenic bacteria. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;80:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu H, Fan Y, Lv X, et al. Activity of synthetic antimicrobial peptide GH12 against oral streptococci. Caries Res. 2016;50(1):48–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang X, Jiang W, et al. Antimicrobial peptide GH12 suppresses cariogenic virulence factors of Streptococcus mutans. J Oral Microbiol. 2018;10(1):1442089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanamoto T, Nonaka K, Nakata M. Genetic variation in experimental dental caries in four inbred strains of rats. Caries Res. 1994;28(3):156–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurihara Y, Naito T, Obayashi K, et al. Caries susceptibility in inbred mouse strains and inheritance patterns in F1 and backcross (N2) progeny from strains with high and low caries susceptibility. Caries Res. 1991;25(5):341–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh PD, Thuy D, Beighton D, et al. Influence of saliva on the oral microbiota. Periodontol 2000. 2016;70(1):80–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobbs AH, Jenkinson HF, Jakubovics NS. Stick to your gums: mechanisms of oral microbial adherence. J Dent Res. 2011;90(11):1271–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na DH, Faraj J, Capan Y, et al. Chewing gum of antimicrobial decapeptide (KSL) as a sustained antiplaque agent: preformulation study. J Control Release. 2005;107(1):122–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao R, Tong Z, Lin Y, et al. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of pleurocidin against cariogenic microorganisms. Peptides. 2011;32(8):1748–1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Weir MD, Xu HHK, et al. Antibacterial and physical properties of calcium-phosphate and calcium-fluoride nanocomposites with chlorhexidine. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):573–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo H, Pearson SK, Scott-Anne K, et al. Effects of apigenin and tt-farnesol on glucosyltransferase activity, biofilm viability and caries development in rats. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2002;17(6):337–343.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Bi Y, Shang X, et al. Antibiofilm activities of a novel chimeolysin against Streptococcus mutans under physiological and cariogenic conditions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(12):7436–7443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/TC194. Biological evaluation of medical devices — part 10: tests for irritation and skin sensitization. Standard Number: ISO 10993-10:2010. 2010. Geneva, Switzerland. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, et al. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes PH. Dental caries in the molar teeth of rats. II. A method for diagnosing and scoring several types of lesions simultaneously. J Dent Res. 1958;37(6):1088–1099.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang K, Wang S, Zhou X, et al. Effect of antibacterial dental adhesive on multispecies biofilms formation. J Dent Res. 2015;94(4):622–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo H, Hayacibara MF, Schobel BD, et al. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm accumulation and polysaccharide production by apigenin and tt-farnesol. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2003;52(5):782–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen WH. Rodent model in caries research. Odontology. 2013;101(1):9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate JM. Contemporary perspective on the use of fluoride products in caries prevention. British Dent J. 2013;214(4):161–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo H, Schobel B, Scott-Anne K, et al. Apigenin and tt-farnesol with fluoride effects on S. mutans biofilms and dental caries. J Dent Res. 2005;84(11):1016–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Cui T, Zeng JM, et al. Molecule targeting glucosyltransferase inhibits Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(1):126–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComb D, Tam LE. Diagnosis of occlusal caries: part I. Conventional methods. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001;67(8):454–457.
   Google Scholar
• Klein MI, Scott-Anne KM, Gregoire S, et al. Molecular approaches for viable bacterial population and transcriptional analyses in a rodent model of dental caries. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2012;27(5):350–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twetman S. Antimicrobials in future caries control? A review with special reference to chlorhexidine treatment. Caries Res. 2004;38(3):223–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Sensat ML, Stoltenberg JL. The antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine varnish on mutans streptococci in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review of clinical efficacy. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016;14(1):53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong L, Tong Z, Linghu D, et al. Effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39(5):390–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera D, Roldan S, Santacruz I, et al. Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial counts study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(4):307–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consuelo Cousido M, Tomas Carmona I, Garcia-Caballero L, et al. In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria. Clin Oral Invest. 2010;14(4):397–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar