Probiotics alter biofilm formation and the transcription of Porphyromonas gingivalis virulence-associated genes

References

• Hajishengallis G, Lambris JD. Complement and dysbiosis in periodontal disease. Immunobiology. 2012;217(11):1111–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebersole JL, Dawson D 3rd, Emecen-Huja P, et al. The periodontal war: microbes and immunity. Periodontol 2000. 2017;75(1):52–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajishengallis G, Darveau RP, Curtis MA. The keystone-pathogen hypothesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(10):717–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1809–1820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S74–S84.
   Google Scholar
• Teughels W, Newman MG, Coucke W, et al. Guiding periodontal pocket recolonization: a proof of concept. J Dent Res. 2007;86(11):1078–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurman JH. Functional foods/ingredients and oral mucosal diseases. Eur J Nutr. 2012;51(Suppl 2):S31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dongarra ML, Rizzello V, Muccio L, et al. Mucosal immunology and probiotics. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13(1):19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque-Souza E, Balzarini D, Ando-Suguimoto ES, et al. Probiotics alter the immune response of gingival epithelial cells challenged by Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontal Res. 2019;54(2):115-127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemka A, Clyne M, Shanahan F, et al. Probiotic colonization of the adherent mucus layer of HT29MTXE12 cells attenuates Campylobacter jejuni virulence properties. Infect Immun. 2010;78(6):2812–2822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Zhu J, Yu H, et al. Investigation into in vitro and in vivo models using intestinal epithelial IPEC-J2 cells and Caenorhabditis elegans for selecting probiotic candidates to control porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;117(1):217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsubara VH, Ishikawa KH, Ando-Suguimoto ES, et al. Probiotic bacteria alter pattern-recognition receptor expression and cytokine profile in a human macrophage model challenged with Candida albicans and Lipopolysaccharide. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen L, Sgorbati B, Biavati B, et al. Lactobacillus salivarius and L. gasseri down-regulate Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans exotoxins expression. Ann Microbiol. 2014;64:611–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuboniwa M, Amano A, Hashino E, et al. Distinct roles of long/short fimbriae and gingipains in homotypic biofilm development by Porphyromonas gingivalis. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont RJ, Bevan CA, Gil S, et al. Involvement of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae in adherence to Streptococcus gordonii. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1993;8(5):272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF. Life below the gum line: pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(4):1244–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg A, Belton CM, Park Y, et al. Role of fimbriae in Porphyromonas gingivalis invasion of gingival epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1997;65(1):313–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajishengallis G. Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(1):30–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Davey M, Yumoto H, et al. Fimbria-dependent activation of pro-inflammatory molecules in Porphyromonas gingivalis infected human aortic endothelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8(5):738–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Ratnayake DB, Okamoto K, et al. Genetic analyses of proteolysis, hemoglobin binding, and hemagglutination of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Construction of mutants with a combination of rgpA, rgpB, kgp, and hagA. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(25):17955–17960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James CE, Hasegawa Y, Park Y, et al. LuxS involvement in the regulation of genes coding for hemin and iron acquisition systems in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun. 2006;74(7):3834–3844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capestany CA, Kuboniwa M, Jung IY, et al. Role of the Porphyromonas gingivalis InlJ protein in homotypic and heterotypic biofilm development. Infect Immun. 2006;74(5):3002–3005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Shi W, Song Y, et al. Metatranscriptomic analysis of an in vitro biofilm model reveals strain-specific interactions among multiple bacterial species. J Oral Microbiol. 2019;11(1):1599670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza TC, Silva AM, Drews JR, et al. In vitro evaluation of Bifidobacterium strains of human origin for potential use in probiotic functional foods. Benef Microbes. 2013;4(2):179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu SD, Cisar JO, Sandberg AL, et al. Adhesive properties of viridans streptococcal species. Microbial Ecol Health Dis. 1994;7(3):125–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KH, Kim BS, Keum KS, et al. Essential oil of Curcuma longa inhibits Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. J Food Sci. 2011;76(9):H226–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda H, Fujimoto C, Haruki Y, et al. Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;39(1):81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acid Res. 2001;29(9):e45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraniya D, Naginyte M, Chen T, et al. Modeling normal and dysbiotic subgingival microbiomes: effect of nutrients. J Dent Res. 2020; 99(6):695–702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon N, Lis H. Lectins as cell recognition molecules. Science. 1989;246(4927):227–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont RJ, Hajishengallis G. Polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis in inflammatory disease. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21(3):172–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira SR, D’Epiro TT, Pinheiro ET, et al. Lineage variability in surface components expression within Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbial Pathogen. 2014;77:100–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak D, Ferdman O, Houri-Haddad Y. Porphyromonas gingivalis capsule-mediated coaggregation as a virulence factor in mixed infection with Fusobacterium nucleatum. J Periodontol. 2017;88(5):502–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa GM, Colombo AV, Rodrigues PH, et al. Intraspecies variability affects heterotypic biofilms of porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia: evidences of strain-dependence biofilm modulation by physical contact and by released soluble factors. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson KE, Fleischmann RD, DeBoy RT, et al. Complete genome sequence of the oral pathogenic Bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis strain W83. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(18):5591–5601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoi N, Maeda H, Murauchi T, et al. IS1598 (IsPg4) distributed to abscess-forming strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis may enhance virulence through upregulation of nrdD-like gene expression. New Microbiol. 2018;41(1):52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäsberg H, Söderling E, Endo A, et al. Bifidobacteria inhibit the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis but not of Streptococcus mutans in an in vitro biofilm model. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(3):251–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Bravo N, Wells JM, Margolles A, et al. Interactions of surface exopolysaccharides from Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus within the intestinal environment. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav AK, Tyagi A, Kumar A, et al. Adhesion of Lactobacilli and their anti-infectivity potential. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(10):2042–2056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller MK, Hasslöf P, Stecksén-Blicks C, et al. Co-aggregation and growth inhibition of probiotic lactobacilli and clinical isolates of mutans streptococci: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011;69(5):263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa I, Amano A, Kuboniwa M, et al. Functional differences among FimA variants of Porphyromonas gingivalis and their effects on adhesion to and invasion of human epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2002;70(1):277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enersen M, Nakano K, Amano A. Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae. J Oral Microbiol. 2013;5:1–10. doi:10.3402/jom.v5i0.20265.
   Google Scholar
• Maeda K, Nagata H, Kuboniwa M, et al. Characterization of binding of Streptococcus oralis glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase to Porphyromonas gingivalis major fimbriae. Infect Immun. 2004;72(9):5475–5477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz O, Watanabe K, Lamont RJ. Involvement of integrins in fimbriae-mediated binding and invasion by Porphyromonas gingivalis. Cell Microbiol. 2002;4(5):305–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey M, Liu X, Ukai T, et al. Bacterial fimbriae stimulate proinflammatory activation in the endothelium through distinct TLRs. J Immunol. 2008;180(4):2187–2195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Wu J, Xie H. Porphyromonas gingivalis minor fimbriae are required for cell-cell interactions. Infect Immun. 2006;74(10):6011–6015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y, Simionato MR, Sekiya K, et al. Short fimbriae of Porphyromonas gingivalis and their role in coadhesion with Streptococcus gordonii. Infect Immun. 2005;73(7):3983–3989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simionato MR, Tucker CM, Kuboniwa M, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis genes involved in community development with Streptococcus gordonii. Infect Immun. 2006;74(11):6419–6428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olczak T, Simpson W, Liu X, et al. Iron and heme utilization in Porphyromonas gingivalis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29(1):119–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini E, Celebioglu HU, Villarroel J, et al. Comparative proteomics of oxidative stress response of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM reveals effects on DNA repair and cysteine de novo synthesis. Proteomics. 2017;17:5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadowaki T, Nakayama K, Yoshimura F, et al. Arg-gingipain acts as a major processing enzyme for various cell surface proteins in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(44):29072–29076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frece J, Kos B, Svetec IK, et al. Importance of S-layer proteins in probiotic activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(2):285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess NA, Kirke DF, Williams P, et al. LuxS-dependent quorum sensing in Porphyromonas gingivalis modulates protease and haemagglutinin activities but is not essential for virulence. Microbiology. 2002;148(Pt 3):763–772.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung WO, Park Y, Lamont RJ, et al. Signaling system in Porphyromonas gingivalis based on a LuxS protein. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(13):3903–3909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebeer S, Claes IJ, Verhoeven TL, et al. Impact of luxS and suppressor mutations on the gastrointestinal transit of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(15):4711–4718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson CM, Aggio RB, O’Toole PW, et al. Transcriptional and metabolomic consequences of LuxS inactivation reveal a metabolic rather than quorum-sensing role for LuxS in Lactobacillus reuteri 100-23. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(7):1743–1746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaen SE, O’Connell Motherway M, Bottacini F, et al. Autoinducer-2 plays a crucial role in gut colonization and probiotic functionality of Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003. PloS One. 2014;9(5):e98111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo S, Park H, Ji Y, et al. Influence of gastrointestinal stress on autoinducer-2 activity of two Lactobacillus species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015;91:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNab R, Ford SK, El-Sabaeny A, et al. LuxS-based signaling in Streptococcus gordonii: autoinducer 2 controls carbohydrate metabolism and biofilm formation with Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol. 2003;185(1):274–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano A, Nakagawa I, Kataoka K, et al. Distribution of Porphyromonas gingivalis strains with fimA genotypes in periodontitis patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(5):1426–1430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, et al. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(6):1166–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Yang J, Zhang L, et al. Differential utilization of basic proline-rich glycoproteins during growth of oral bacteria in saliva. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(17):5249–5258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capestany CA, Tribble GD, Maeda K, et al. Role of the Clp system in stress tolerance, biofilm formation, and intracellular invasion in Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(4):1436–1446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar