Susceptibility to biofilm formation on 3D-printed titanium fixation plates used in the mandible: a preliminary study

References

• Hollander DA, von Walter M, Wirtz T, et al. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-6Al-4V produced by direct laser forming. Biomaterials. 2006;27(7):955–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku CH, Pioletti DP, Browne M, et al. Effect of different Ti-6Al-4V surface treatments on osteoblasts behaviour. Biomaterials. 2002;23(6):1447–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr LE, Quinones SA, Gaytan SM, et al. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009;2(1):20–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neoh KG, Hu X, Zheng D, et al. Balancing osteoblast functions and bacterial adhesion on functionalized titanium surfaces. Biomaterials. 2012;33(10):2813–2822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai L, Gong C, Chen X, et al. Additive manufacturing of customized metallic orthopedic implants: materials, structures, and surface modifications. Metals. 2019;9:1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hajje A, Kolos EC, Wang JK, et al. Physical and mechanical characterisation of 3D-printed porous titanium for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25(11):2471–2480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabilleau G, Bourdon S, Joly-Guillou ML, et al. Influence of fluoride, hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid on the corrosion resistance of commercially pure titanium. Acta Biomater. 2006;2(1):121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Přikrylová J, Procházková J, Podzimek Š. Side effects of dental metal implants: impact on human health (Metal as a risk factor of implantologic treatment). Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:2519205. Published 2019 Jul 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger M, Sterer N, Liron T, et al. Scaling of titanium implants entrains inflammation-induced osteolysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39612. Published 2017 Jan 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irshad M, Scheres N, Crielaard W, et al. Influence of titanium on in vitro fibroblast-Porphyromonas gingivalis interaction in peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(9):841–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson M, Kelk P, Belibasakis GN, et al. Titanium ions form particles that activate and execute interleukin-1β release from lipopolysaccharide-primed macrophages. J Periodontal Res. 2017;52(1):21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taira M, Kagiya T, Harada H, et al. Microscopic observations and inflammatory cytokine productions of human macrophage phagocytising submicron titanium particles. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(1):267–275. Epub 2009 Jul 31. PMID: 19644653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JJ, Sanderson BJ, Wang H. Cyto- and genotoxicity of ultrafine TiO2 particles in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells. Mutat Res. 2007;628(2):99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, et al. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):457–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5474–5491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11(1):38–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montanaro L, Speziale P, Campoccia D, et al. Scenery of Staphylococcus implant infections in orthopedics. Future Microbiol. 2011;6(11):1329–1349. PMID: 22082292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster CE, Lamberth LB, Kaplan SL, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus implant-associated infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(8):808–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho OH, Bae IG, Moon SM, et al. Therapeutic outcome of spinal implant infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(40):e12629. PMID: 30290637; PMCID: PMC6200525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadatian-Elahi M, Teyssou R, Vanhems P. Staphylococcus aureus, the major pathogen in orthopaedic and cardiac surgical site infections: a literature review. Int J Surg. 2008;6(3):238–245.
   Google Scholar
• Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28(11):1062–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoodley P, Nistico L, Johnson S, et al. Direct demonstration of viable Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an infected total joint arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(8):1751–1758. PMID: 18676908; PMCID: PMC2729478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto MK, D’Avila RP, Luz JG. Evaluation of surgical retreatment of mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(1):42–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira WF, Silva PMS, Silva RCS, et al. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections on implants. J Hosp Infect. 2018;98(2):111–117. Epub 2017 Nov 22. PMID: 29175074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LG, Richards RG. Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to different treated titanium surfaces. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15(4):311–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst MM, Salvi GE, Lang NP, et al. Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(4):501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhass AK, Johnston DA, Gulati A, et al. A scanning electron microscope characterisation of biofilm on failed craniofacial osteosynthesis miniplates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(7):e372–e378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira RVD, FSS B, Spolidorio DMP, et al. Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii interaction in dual-species biofilm. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):194. Published 2020 Jan 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JC, Ponthiaux P, Henriques M, et al. Corrosion behaviour of titanium in the presence of Streptococcus mutans. J Dent. 2013;41(6):528–534. Epub 2013 Apr 9. PMID: 23578470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, et al. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24(6):732–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge J, Catt DM, Gregory RL. Streptococcus mutans surface alpha-enolase binds salivary mucin MG2 and human plasminogen. Infect Immun. 2004;72(11):6748–6752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Burne RA. Regulation of the gtfBC and ftf genes of Streptococcus mutans in biofilms in response to pH and carbohydrate. Microbiology. 2001;147(Pt 10):2841–2848.
   Google Scholar
• Barbieri D, Vicente VA, Fraiz FC, et al. Analysis of the in vitro adherence of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38:624–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz LM, Deng DM, van der Mei HC, et al. Streptococcus mutans competence-stimulating peptide inhibits Candida albicans hypha formation. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8(11):1658–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metwalli KH, Khan SA, Krom BP, et al. Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, and the human mouth: a sticky situation. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(10):e1003616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T. 2014;39(10):704–711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louvrier A, Marty P, Barrabé A, et al. How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;118(4):206–212. Epub 2017 Jul 18. PMID: 28732777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Wang Y, Wu S, et al. Customized a Ti6Al4V bone plate for complex pelvic fracture by selective laser melting. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(1):35. PMID: 28772395; PMCID: PMC5344552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, et al. Ti-6Al-4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;51:61–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S, et al. Fabrication of titanium alloy frameworks for complete dentures by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1441–1447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KE, Dupont KM, Safranski DL, et al. Use of 3D printed bone plate in novel technique to surgically correct hallux valgus deformities. Tech Orthop. 2016;31(3):181–189. PMID: 28337049; PMCID: PMC5358518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan XP, Tan YJ, Chow CSL, et al. Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;76:1328–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Xiao X, Wang Y, et al. Biocompatibility of bespoke 3D-printed titanium alloy plates for treating acetabular fractures. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2053486. PMID: 29682523; PMCID: PMC5842717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chioibasu D, Achim A, Popescu C, et al. Prototype orthopedic bone plates 3D printed by laser melting deposition. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymczyk P, Junka A, Ziółkowski G, et al. The ability of S. aureus to form biofilm on the Ti-6Al-7Nb scaffolds produced by Selective Laser Melting and subjected to the different types of surface modifications. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2013;15(1):69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaffey M, Zur Linden A, Bachynski N, et al. Manual polishing of 3D printed metals produced by laser powder bed fusion reduces biofilm formation. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212995. Published 2019 Feb 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woźna AE, Junka AF, Szymczyk PE. The influence of different composite mixtures (PLA/HA) manufactured with additive laser technology on the ability of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa to form biofilms. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2018;20:101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SJ, Ahn SJ, Wen ZT, et al. Characteristics of biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva. Infect Immun. 2008 Sep;76(9):4259–4268. Epub 2008 Jul 14. PMID: 18625741; PMCID: PMC2519434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C, Lukowicz R, Merchant S, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment methods for biofilm growth: A mini-review. Res Rev J Eng Technol. 2017;6(4). Epub 2017 Oct 24. PMID: 30214915; PMCID: PMC6133255. Available from: http://www.rroij.com/open-access/quantitative-and-qualitative-assessment-methods-for-biofilm-growth-a-minireview-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Kim MJ, Kang HY, et al. A simple colorimetric method for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of biofilmed bacteria. J Microbiol. 2010;48:709–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiecinska-Piróg J, Bogiel T, Skowron K, et al. Proteus mirabilis biofilm - qualitative and quantitative colorimetric methods-based evaluation. Braz J Microbiol. 2015;4(45):1423–1431.
   Google Scholar
• Nycz M, Paradowska E, Arkusz K, et al. Surface analysis of long-term hemodialysis catheters made of carbothane (poly(carbonate)urethane) before and after implantation in the patients’ bodies. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2018;20:47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migneault I, Dartiguenave C, Bertrand MJ, et al. Glutaraldehyde: behavior in aqueous solution, reaction with proteins, and application to enzyme crosslinking. Bio Techniq. 2004;37:790–802.
   Google Scholar
• Elemek E, Agrali OB, Kuru B, et al. Peri-implantitis and severity level. Eur J Dent. 2020;14:24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shunmugaperumal T. Biofilm eradication and prevention: a pharmaceutical approach to medical device infections. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with fracture-fixation devices. Injury. 2006;37(Suppl 2):S59–S66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campoccia D, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance. Biomaterials. 2006;27(11):2331–2339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaté Brescó M, Harris LG, Thompson K, et al. Pathogenic mechanisms and host interactions in Staphylococcus epidermidis device-related infection. Front Microbiol. 2017;2(8):1401. PMID: 28824556; PMCID: PMC5539136.
   Google Scholar
• Wei N, Bin S, Jing Z, et al. Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible. Am J Dent. 2014;27(3):171–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passarelli PC, De Leonardis M, Piccirillo GB, et al. The effectiveness of chlorhexidine and air polishing system in the treatment of Candida albicans infected dental implants: an experimental in vitro study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(4):179. Published 2020 Apr 14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liu C, Wang B, et al. Heat treatment effect on the mechanical properties, roughness and bone ingrowth capacity of 3D printing porous titanium alloy. RSC Adv. 2018;8(22):12471–12483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivas PK, Kapat K, Das B, et al. Hierarchical surface morphology on Ti6Al4V via patterning and hydrothermal treatment towards improving cellular response. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;478:806–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbey BB. Surface finish control of 3D printed metal tooling. All Theses, Paper 234. Clemson University; 2007. TigerPrints, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Kim MY, Knowles JC, et al. Mechanophysical and biological properties of a 3D-printed titanium alloy for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2020;36(7):945–958. Epub 2020 May 29. PMID: 32475749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belibasakis GN. Microbiological and immuno-pathological aspects of peri-implant diseases. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59:66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello DCR, de Oliveira JR, Cairo CAA, et al. Titanium alloys: in vitro biological analyzes on biofilm formation, biocompatibility, cell differentiation to induce bone formation, and immunological response. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(9):108. PMID: 31535222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyściak W, Jurczak A, Kościelniak D, et al. The virulence of Streptococcus mutans and the ability to form biofilms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(4):499–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra R, Dhawan B, Garg B, et al. A comparison of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on commonly used orthopaedic metal implant materials: an in vitro Study. Indian J Orthop. 2019;53:148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Moser C, Wang HZ, et al. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections. Int J Oral Sci. 2015;7(1):1–7. Published 2015 Mar 23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoda I, Koseki H, Tomita M, et al. Effect of surface roughness of biomaterials on Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion. BMC Microbiol. 2014;2(14):234. PMID: 25179448; PMCID: PMC4161769.
   Google Scholar
• Salas-Jara MJ, Ilabaca A, Vega M, et al. Biofilm forming Lactobacillus: new challenges for the development of probiotics. Microorganisms. 2016;4(3):35. Published 2016 Sep 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JW, An JS, Lim WH, et al. Microbial changes in biofilms on composite resins with different surface roughness: an in vitro study with a multispecies biofilm model. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(5):493.e1-493.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Açil Y, Heitzer MA, Gülses A, et al. The correlation between periodontal health status and suspectibility to infections associated with craniomaxillofacial osteosynthesis plates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(11):1868–1874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Hirota K, Goto T, et al. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on implant overdenture materials and its removal. J Dent. 2012;40(8):686–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do Nascimento C, Pita MS, Pedrazzi V, et al. In vivo evaluation of Candida spp. adhesion on titanium or zirconia abutment surfaces. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(7):853–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelongo-Jauregui D, Srinivasan A, Ramasubramanian AK, et al. An in vitro model for Candida albicans-Streptococcus gordonii biofilms on titanium surfaces. J Fungi (Basel). 2018;4(2):66. Published 2018 Jun 4.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie K, Guo Y, Zhao S, et al. Partially melted Ti6Al4V particles increase bacterial adhesion and inhibit osteogenic activity on 3D-printed implants: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(12):2772–2782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mott R, Priefer R. Multilayering as a solution to medical device failure. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;193:111154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez López AL, Lee MR, Ortiz BJ, et al. Preventing S. aureus biofilm formation on titanium surfaces by the release of antimicrobial β-peptides from polyelectrolyte multilayers. Acta Biomater. 2019;15(93):50–62. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Erratum in: Acta Biomater. 2020 Jul 15;111:429. PMID: 30831325; PMCID: PMC6693497.
   Google Scholar
• Metsemakers WJ, Schmid T, Zeiter S, et al. Titanium and steel fracture fixation plates with different surface topographies: influence on infection rate in a rabbit fracture model. Injury. 2016;47(3):633–639. Epub 2016 Jan 20. PMID: 26830128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar