Gazing at monsters: aesthetics, politics, and the national distribution of the sensible

References

• Adanalı, Y. 2013. “Yaratıcı Yıkım: 2 Meydan, 1 Anıt.” In Monument to Humanity: Helping Hands, edited by Z. Berik, 4–13. Accessed June 16, 2023. https://www.wouterosterholt.com/insanlik-aniti-yardim-eden-eller/publication.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. 1999. The Man without Content, Translated by Georgia Albert. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahıska, M. 2011. “Monsters That Remember: Tracing the Story of the Workers’ Monument in Tophane, Istanbul.” New Perspectives on Turkey 45:9–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600001291.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. 2006. Culture and Anarchy, Edited by Jane Garnett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1968a. “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” In Illuminations, edited by H. Arendt, Translated by H. Zohn, 253–264. New York: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1968b. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by H. Arendt, Translated by H. Zohn, 217–251. New York: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Buck-Morss, S. 1992. “Aesthetics and Anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin’s Artwork Essay Reconsidered.” October 62:3–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/778700.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. J., ed. 1996. “Monster Culture (Seven Theses).” In Monster Theory: Reading Culture, 3–26. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culler, J. 1989. “‘Paul de Man’s War’ and the Aesthetic Ideology.” Critical Inquiry 15 (4): 777–783. https://doi.org/10.1086/448518.
   Google Scholar
• “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Amacı hakikati bulmak olan herkese arşivlerimiz açık.” TRT Haber. April 24, 2019. Accessed March 25, 2022. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-amaci-hakikati-bulmak-olan-herkese-arsivlerimiz-acik-412983.html.
   Google Scholar
• De Man, P. 1986. “The Resistance to Theory.” In The Resistance to Theory, 3–20. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Man, P. 1996. The Aesthetic Ideology, Edited by Andrzej Warminski. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deringil, S. 2002. “The Study of the Armenian Crisis of the Late Ottoman Empire, Or, ‘Seizing the Document by the Throat’.” New Perspectives on Turkey 27:35–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600003794.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. 1990. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1993. “‘The Aesthetic Ideology’ as Ideology: Or What Does It Mean to Aestheticize Politics?” In Force Fields: Between Intellectual History and Cultural Critique, 71–83. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 2004. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, Translated by John T. Goldthwait. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meister, R. 2010. After Evil: A Politics of Human Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichanian, M. 2009. The Historiographic Perversion, Translated by Gil Anidjar. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osterholt, W., and U. Elke. 2013. “Monument to Humanity: Helping Hands.” In Monument to Humanity: Helping Hands, edited by Z. Berik, 2–3. Accessed June 16, 2023. https://www.wouterosterholt.com/insanlik-aniti-yardim-eden-eller/publication.
   Google Scholar
• Özbek, E. 2018. “The Destruction of the Monument to Humanity: Historical Conflict and Monumentalization.” International Public History 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.1515/iph-2018-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Panagia, D. 2010. “‘Partage du sensible.” In Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts, edited by J.-P. Deranty, 95–104. Durham: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible, Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator, Translated by Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2011. “The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics.” In Reading Rancière: Critical Dissensus, edited by P. Bowman and R. Stamp, 1–17. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, M. 1996. Phantom Formations: Aesthetic Ideology and the Bildungsroman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renan, E. 1990. “What is a Nation?” In Nation and Narration, edited by H. Bhabha. Translated by M. Thom, 8–22. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saymaz, İ. “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan ‘Ucube’den 10 bin TL tazminata mahkum edildi.” Radikal. March 3, 2015. Accessed April 16, 2020. http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-ucubeden-10-bin-tl-tazminata-mahkum-edildi-1305241/.
   Google Scholar
• Scarry, E. 1999. On Beauty and Being Just. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheper-Hughes, N. 1992. Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, S., ed. 2009. “Fascinating Fascism.” In Under the Sign of Saturn, 73–105. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tambar, K. 2017. “The Uncanny Medium: Semiotic Opacity in the Wake of Genocide.” Current Anthropology 58 (6): 762–784. https://doi.org/10.1086/694761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar