1,383
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Duration of On-Campus Academic Engagements of Student Teachers in Finland and Norway

, , , &

References

  • Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). ‘Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes’. Journal of educational psychology, 80(3),260–267.
  • Archer, J. (1994). ‘Achievement goals as a measure of motivation in university students’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), pp. 430–446.
  • Ashton, P. (1984). ‘Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education’, Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), pp. 28–32.
  • Baumeister, R.F. and Tierney, J. (2011). Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York: Penguin.
  • Blömeke, S. and Paine, L. (2008). ‘Getting the fish out of the water: Considering benefits and problems of doing research on teacher education at an international level’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), pp. 2027–2037.
  • British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2014). The role of research in teacher education: Reviewing the Evidence. [Online]. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-RSA-Interim-Report.pdf?noredirect=1 ( Accessed: 2 February 2016).
  • Brunello, G. and Schlotter, M. (2011). ‘Non-cognitive skills and personality traits: Labour market relevance and their development in education & training systems’, IZA DP, 5743, [Online]. Available at: ftp://repec.iza.org/RePEc/Discussionpaper/dp5743.pdf ( Accessed: 21 March 2016).
  • Corno, L. (2001) Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning, in Zimmerman, B. and Schunk, D. (eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (pp. 179-210).
  • Damen, M.-L., Keller, L.D., Hamberg, S. and Bakken, P. (2016). Studiebarometeret 2015: Hovedtendenser. Oslo: NOKUT [Online]. Available at: http://www.nokut.no/Documents/Studiebarometeret/2016/Studiebarometeret_2015_hovedtendenser_1-2016.pdf ( Accessed: 31 October 2016).
  • Darling-Hammond, L. and Lieberman, A. (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. New York: Routledge.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
  • Ekspertgruppa om lærerrollen (2016). Om lærerrollen. Et kunnskapsgrunnlag. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. New York: Routledge.
  • Heckhausen, H. (1977). ‘Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model’, Motivation and Emotion, 1(4), pp. 183–329.
  • Ingvarson, L., Schwille, J., Tattoo, T.M., Rowley, G., Peck, R. and Senk, S.L. (2013). An analysis of teacher education context, structure, and quality-assurance arrangements in TEDS-M countries. Amsterdam: IEA.
  • Krzywacki-Vainio, H. & Juuti, K. (2006). Student Teachers’ Views on Relevance and Coherence of Mathematics and Science Teacher Education Programme: differentiation in starting points. Paper presented and discussed in 30th Annual Conference ATEE, Amsterdam 22-26 October 2005.
  • Kuhl, J. (1985) Volitional mediators of cognitive-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation, in Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action control: From cognition to behaviour. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 89–100.
  • Lavonen, J. and Juuti, K. (2012). Science at Finnish compulsory school, in Kallioniemi, A., Niemi, H. and Toom A. (eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 131–147.
  • Lid, S.E. (2013). PPUs relevans for undervisning i skolen. En kartlegging av studenters og nyutdannede læreres oppfatninger, NOKUTs utredninger og analyser. Oslo: NOKUT.
  • Lid, S.E. (2014). Study effort. Analysis of data from study barometer 2013. Oslo: The Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education.
  • Martinussen, G. and Smestad, B. (2011). Allmennlærerstudenters arbeidsinnsats: Bedre enn sitt rykte?, in FoU i praksis 2010. Rapport fra konferanse om praksisrettet FoU i lærerutdanning. Trondheim, 10. og 11. mai 2010. Trondheim: Tapir, pp. 331–340.
  • McClure, S.M., Laibson, D., Loewenstein, G. and Cohen, J.D. (2004). ‘Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards’, Science, 306 (5695), pp. 503–507.
  • Miller, A.L. (2012). ‘Investigating social desirability bias in student self-report surveys’, Educational Research Quarterly, 36(1), pp. 130–147.
  • Ministry of Education and Research, Norway (2009a). Læreren – rollen og utdanningen, White Paper no. 11. Oslo: Ministry of Education.
  • Møen, J., Salvanes, K.G. and Thorsen, H.S. (2012). ‘Har kvaliteten på lærere falt over tid?’, Magma, 6, pp. 62–71.
  • Muraven, M. and Baumeister, R.F. (2000). ‘Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle?’, Psychological Bulletin, 126 (2), pp. 247–259.
  • Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education (NOKUT). (2006). Evaluering av allmennlaererutdanninggen i Norge 2006. Del 1: Hovedrapport. Oslo, Nasjonalt organ for kvalitet i utdanningen [Evaluation of the general teacher education in Norway 2006. Part 1: Main report. Oslo, Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education].
  • OECD (2013). PISA 2012. Technical Report. Paris: OECD [Online]. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2012-technical-report-final.pdf
  • OECD (2014a). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD [Online]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf ( Accessed 3 March 2016).
  • OECD (2014b). New Insights from TALIS 2013. Teaching and Learning in Primary and Upper Secondary Education. Paris: OECD [Online]. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/new-insights-from-talis-2013-9789264226319-en.htm ( Accessed 3 March 2016).
  • Pintrich, P.R. (2000). ‘An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research’, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), pp. 92–104.
  • Porter, S.R. (2011). ‘Do college student surveys have any validity?’, The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), pp. 47–76.
  • Roksvaag, K. and Texmon, I. (2012). Arbeidsmarkedet for lærere og førskolelærere fram mot år 2035. Report no 18. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
  • Roness, D. and Smith, K. (2009). ‘Postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE) and student motivation’, European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), pp. 111–134.
  • Seidel,T and Shavelson, R. (2007). ‘Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade’. Review of Educational Research, 77 (4), pp. 454–499.
  • Senko, C., Hulleman, C.S. and Harackiewicz, J.M. (2011). ‘Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions’, Educational Psychologist, 46(1), pp. 26–47.
  • Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F. and Boone, A.L. (2008). ‘High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success’, Journal of Personality, 72(2), pp. 271–324.
  • Union of Education Norway (2009). En ansvarlig og offensiv profesjon. Oslo: Union of Education Norway.
  • University of Oslo (2016). Programme information and registration. Available at: http://www.uio.no/english/studies/new-student/full-degree-students.html, (Accessed: 18 August 2016).
  • Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Briere, N.M., Senecal, C. and Vallieres, E.F. (1992). ‘The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), pp. 1003–1017.