Do they have a choice?: pupils’ choices at LTCs in the intersection between tradition, values and new demands

References

• Andersson, B. (2013). Nya fritidspedagoger. I spänningsfältet mellan tradition och nya styrformer [New leisure-time pedagogues. In tension between tradition and new forms of governance] ( Doctoral thesis). Umeå Universitet, Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Elvstrand, H., & Lago, L. (2018). ‘You know that we are not able to go to McDonald’s’: Processes of doing participation in Swedish leisure time centres. Early Child Development and Care, 1–11. doi:10.1080/03004430.2018.1443920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, J. G. (2012). Teacher careers and inhabited institutions. Sense-making and arsenals of teaching practice in educational institutions. Symbolic Interaction, 35(2), 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, N., Theis, D., & Zücher, I. (2014). Narrowing the gap? The role of all-day schools in reducing educational inequality in Germany. IJREE International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 2(1), 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Granström, K. (2003). Om vuxnas samarbete och kompetensutnyttjande [On adult co-operation and skills utilization]. In Skolverket (Ed.), Lagarbete och tidig läs- och skrivutveckling (pp. 13–28). Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund, B. (2015). Everyday practice at the sunflower. The staff’s representations and governing strategies as contributions to the order of discourse. Education of Inquiry, 6(2), 209–229.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T., & Meanwell, E. (2016). Accountability as an inhabited institution: Contested meanings and the symbolic politics of reform. Symbolic Interaction, 39(3), 374–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, T., & Ventresca, M. (2006). Inhabited institutions. Social interactions and organizational forms in gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35(2), 213–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography. Principles in practice. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, M. (2013). Governance and voluntariness for children in Swedish leisure-time centres. Leisure-time teachers interpreting their tasks and everyday practice. IJREE International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 1(1), 86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, M., & Löfdahl Hultman, A. (2015). Confirming and resisting an underdog position. Leisure-time teachers dealing with a new practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(4), 434–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lager, K. (2016). ‘Learning to play with new friends’. Systematic quality development work in a leisure-time centre. Early Child Development and Care, 186(2), 307–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lager, K. (2018). Leisure-time centres. Social pedagogical tradition in educational practice. Early Child Development and Care, 1–13. doi:10.1080/03004430.2018.1429425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, L., Ackesjö, H., & Persson, S. (2018). Erkännandets dynamik: Förskoleklasslärares tolkningar av ny läroplanstext. Educare, 2018(1), 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Närvänen, A.-L., & Elvstrand, H. (2014). På väg att (om)skapa fritidshemskulturer. Om visioner, gränsdragningar och identitetsarbete. Barn, 3, 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Pálsdóttir, K., & Kristjánsdóttir, S. (2017). Leisure-time centres for 6–9 year old children in Iceland. Policies, practices and challenges. IJREE International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 5(2), 211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K. (2000). Democracy, education and citizenship. Towards a theory on the education of deliberative democratic citizens ( Doctoral thesis). HLS Förlag, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Saar, T. (2014). Towards a new pedagogy in the after-school setting. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(2), 254–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saar, T., Löfdahl, A., & Hjalmarsson, M. (2012). Kunskapsmöjligheter i svenska fritidshem [Knowledge opportunities in Swedish LTC]. Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 5(3), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Skelton, T. (2008). Research with pupils and young people. Exploring the tension between ethics, competence and participation. Pupils’s Geographies, 6(1), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency of Education. (2014). Fritidshem: Skolverkets allmänna råd med kommentarer [LTC. General guidelines with comments]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency of Education. (2017). Elever och grupper i fritidshem 15 oktober 2016 [Pupils and groups in LTC]. Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering/statistik-i-tabeller/fritidshem/elever-och-grupper
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency of Education. (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre, 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2017). God forskningssed [Good research practice]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2018). Undervisning i fritidshemmet inom områdena språk och kommunikation samt natur och samhälle [Education in LTC in the fields of language and communication, nature and society]. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. (2016). Grounded theory. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith, & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research (pp. 355–375). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar