Redefining public values: data use and value dilemmas in education

References

• Afdal, G. (2018). Mellom effektivitet og verdier? Om accountability-politikk og læreres profesjonelle verdier [Between efficiency and values? On accountability policies and teachers professional values]. In E. Schjetne & T. A. Skrefsrud (Eds.), Å være lærer i en mangfoldig skole (pp. 220–237). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Jørgensen, T. (2003). På sporet af en offentlig identitet. Værdier i stat, amter og kommuner [Tracing a public identity. Values in the state and municipalities]. Århus: Aarhus universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, T., & Wennes, G. (2012). Changing values in the modern public sector: The need for value‐based leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 8(4), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. (2010). Personal and professional values in teaching. In I. T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing (pp. 63–74). Dortrecht: Springer Media.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Practice, 9(4), 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1991). Managing dilemmas while building professional communities. Education Researcher, 21(1), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Devaney, J., & Spratt, T. (2009). Child abuse as a complex and wicked problem: Reflecting on policy developments in the United Kingdom in working with children and families with multiple problems. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(6), 635–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransson, G., & Grannäs, J. (2013). Dilemmatic spaces in educational contexts – Towards a conceptual framework for dilemmas in teachers work. Teachers and Teaching, 19(1), 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T. F. (1983). Excellence, equality and equity. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 318–341). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Grimen, H. (2008). Profesjon og kunnskap [Profession and knowledge]. In A. Molander & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier (pp. 71–86). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2016). Educational reforms and marketization in Norway: A challenge to the tradition of the social democratic, inclusive school? Research in Comparative and International Education, 11(1), 52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B. (2002). Performativity and primary teacher relations. Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification. In: Parsons, T. and Shils, E., Eds., Toward a General Theory of Action. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T., Vulliamy, G., Webb, R., & Hill, M. (2005). Being a ‘professional’ primary school teacher at the beginning of the 21st century: A comparative analysis of primary teacher professionalism in New Zealand and England. Journal of Education Policy, 20(5), 555–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S. (2013). Reshaping teacher professionalism. An analysis of how teachers construct and negotiate professionalism under increased accountability (PhD-thesis). Oslo and Akershus University College, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., Prøitz, T. S., & Skedsmo, G. (2018). Teachers’ use of knowledge sources in ‘result meetings’: Thin data and thick data use. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24, 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, B., & Schwimmer, M. (2016). Professional ethics education for future teachers: A narrative review of the scholarly writings. Journal of Moral Education, 45(3), 354–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (2015). Researching Norwegian principals. In H. Ârlestig, C. Day, & O. Johansson (Eds.), A decade of research on school principals: Cases from 24 countries. Dortrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A., Edwards, G., Halpin, D., & George, R. (2002). Compliance, resistance and pragmatism: The (re)construction of schoolteacher identities in a period of intensive educational reform. British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 551–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., Mausethagen, S., & Skedsmo, G. (2017). Investigative modes in research on data use in education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3, 42–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2014). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G. (2018). Comparison and benchmarking as governing processes in norwegian schools. I: Education Policies and the Restructuring of the Educational Profession - Global and Comparative Perspectives. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., Stark, S., & Warne, T. (2002). Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: teacher and nurse identities in flux. Journal of Education Policy, 17(1), 109–138. doi:10.1080/02680930110100081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman, J. C., Jimerson, J. B., & Cho, V. (2012). Organizational considerations in establishing the data-informed district. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2011). Professionalism and the post-performative teacher: New teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional Development in Education, 37(3), 1–21.
   Google Scholar