Computers in education: the association between computer use and test scores in primary school

References

• Banerjee, A. V., Cole, S., Duflo, E., & Linden, L. (2007). Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1235–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrow, L., Markman, L., & Rouse, C. E. (2009). Technology’s Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1), 52–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard, K., & Dhuey, E. (2006). The persistence of early childhood maturity: International evidence of long-run age effects. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1437–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuermann, D. W., Cristia, J., Cueto, S., Malamud, O., & Cruz-Aguayo, Y. (2015). One laptop per child at home: Short-term impacts from a randomized experiment in Peru. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., & Salvanes, K. G. (2011). Too young to leave the nest? The effects of school starting age. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 455–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, B. J., & Basu, A. (2013). Highlighting differences between conditional and unconditional quantile regression approaches through an application to assess medication adherence. Health Economics, 22(9), 1052–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgen, N. T. (2016). Fixed effects in unconditional quantile regression. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 16(2), 403–415.
   Google Scholar
• Bulman, G. and R. W. Fairlie (2016), “Technology and education: Computers, software, and the internet” in Hanushek, E. A., S. Machin and L. Woessman (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. P., Greenberg, K., & Walker, M. S. (2017). The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy. Economics of Education Review, 56, 118–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, E. U., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2016). First in the class? Age and the education production function. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 225–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Cueto, S., Santiago, A., & Severín, E. (2012). Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 295-320. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, A., McIntosh, S., & Valente, C. (2015). Do the maths: An analysis of the gender gap in mathematics in Africa. Economics of Education Review, 46, 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiNardo, J. E., & Pischke, J.-S. (1997). The returns to computer use revisited: Have pencils changed the wage structure too? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustmann, C., Frattini, T., & Lanzara, G. (2012). Educational achievement of second-generation immigrants: An international comparison. Economic Policy, 27(69), 143–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck, O., Mang, C., & Wössmann, L. (2018). Virtually no effect? Different uses of classroom computers and their effect on student achievement. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorini, M. (2010). The effect of home computer use on children’s cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Economics of Education Review, 29(1), 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firpo, S., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3), 953–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy, P., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Yin, L., Cotter, K., & Liu, J. (2015). Reviewing the TIMSS Advanced 2015 Achievement Item Statistics. In Methods and Procedures in TIMSS Advanced 2015 (pp. 11.1–11.19). Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-a-methods/chapter-11.html
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P., & Öckert, B. (2014). Life-cycle Effects of Age at School Start. The Economic Journal, 124(579), 977–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer Jr, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal:Applied Economics, 2(2), 210–240.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., & Wössmann, L. (2004). Computers and student learning: Bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school. Brussels Economic Review, 2004(47), 359–386.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Caroline & Lundin, Martin & Sibbmark, Kristina, 2019. “A laptop for every child? The impact of ICT on educational outcomes,„ Working Paper Series 2019:26, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. The Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double Jeopardy: How Third-Grade Reading Skills and Poverty Influence High School Graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, M., & Duch, K. (2019). One-to-One technology and student outcomes: Evidence from Mooresville’s digital conversion initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2017). What happens when econometrics and psychometrics collide? An example using the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 61, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killewald, A., & Bearak, J. (2014). Is the motherhood penalty larger for low-wage women? A comment on quantile regression. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 350–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRoche, S., Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample Design in TIMSS 2015. In Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 3.1–3.37). Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-3.html
   Google Scholar
• Leuven, E., Lindahl, M., Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2007). The effect of extra funding for disadvantaged students on achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 721–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevin Macdonald, 2008. “PV: Stata module to perform estimation with plausible values,„ Statistical Software Components S456951, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 03 Feb 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, S., McNally, S., & Silva, O. (2007). New Technology in Schools: Is There a Payoff? The Economic Journal, 117(522), 1145–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlenweg, A. M., & Puhani, P. A. (2010). The evolution of the school-entry age effect in a school tracking system. Journal of Human Resources, 45(2), 407–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I.V.S. & Martin, M.O. (Eds.) (2013). TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/frameworks.html.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Hooper, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods.html.
   Google Scholar
• Muralidharan, K., Singh, A., & Ganimian, A. J. (2019). Disrupting education? Experimental evidence on technology-aided instruction in India. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1426–1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world?: What PISA studies tell us. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Are the New Millennium Learners Making the Grade?: Technology Use and Educational Performance in PISA 2006. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 268–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Planas, N., & Nollenberger, N. (2018). Let the girls learn! It is not only about math… it's about gender social norms. Economics of Education Review, 62, 230–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütz, G., Ursprung, H. W., & Wössmann, L. (2008). Education policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2), 279–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiezia, V. (2011). Does Computer Use Increase Educational Achievements? Student-level Evidence from PISA. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2010(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. (2009). What are plausible values and why are they useful. IERI Monograph Series, 2(1), 9–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wössmann, L. (2016). The Importance of School Systems: Evidence from International Differences in Student Achievement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(2–3), 114–128.
   Google Scholar
• Yanguas, M. L. (2020). Technology and educational choices: Evidence from a one-laptop-per-child program. Economics of Education Review, 76, 101984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar