Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden

References

• Altbach, P. G. (2015). What counts for academic productivity in research universities? International Higher Education. Winter, 79, 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Askling, B. (2007). Om sakkunskap och expertis i nationella utvärderingar och kvalitetsbedömningar [About expert knowledge and expertise in national evaluations and assessments of quality]. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bolander Laksov, K. (2018). Att bedöma pedagogisk skicklighet – är det verkligen så svårt? – En studie av skillnader i bedömningar mellan vetenskapligt och pedagogiskt sakkunniga [To assess educational proficiency – Is it really that hard? – A study of distinctions in assessments between scientific and educational experts]. Högre Utbildning, 8(2), 55.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S., & Woollacott, L. C. (2018). On the constitution of SoTL: Its domains and contexts. Higher Education, 75(3), 537–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boshier, B. (2009). Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning such a hard sell? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., & Del Favero, M. (2002). Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Burkill, S. (2002). Recognising and rewarding excellent teachers: Towards a strategy for geography departments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 2(3), 253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (2011). Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the scholarship of teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., & Hyon, S. (2005). Faculty evaluation as a genre system: Negotiating intertextuality and interpersonality. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 153–184.
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. L. (2002). Integration: Evaluating faculty work as a whole. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The ultimate faculty evaluation: Promotion and tenure decisions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fumasoli, T., & Goastellec, G. (2015). Global models, disciplinary and local patterns in academic recruitment processes. In T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives (Vol. 12) (pp. 69-93). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fumasoli, T., Goastellec, G., & Kehm, B. M. (2015). Academic careers and work in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives. In T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, & B. M. Kehm (Eds.), Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives (Vol. 12) (pp. 201-214). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1999). Improving teaching, learning and assessment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23(2), 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassick, C., Huber, M., & Maeroff, G. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, C. (2014). Förändras docentutlåtanden över tid? En studie av docentutlåtanden inom Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten vid Uppsala universitet 2000–2012 [Are evaluation reports from docent evaluations changing over time?] Report, Docent board, Faculty of Social Sciences. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsson, M., Jörnesten, A., & Geschwind, L. (2017). Translating tenure track into Swedish: Tensions when implementing an academic career system. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högskoleverket. (2006). Högre utbildning och forskning 1945–2005 – En översikt [Higher education and research 1945–2005 – an overview]. Högskoleverkets Rapportserie 2006: 3R. Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T. (2002). Faculty evaluation and the development of academic careers. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 31(5), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, W., & de Rijcke, S. (2019). Filling in the gaps: The interpretation of curricula vitae in peer review. Social Studies of Science, 49(6), 863–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2002). Teaching excellence, teaching expertise, and the scholarship of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 27(1), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Langfeldt, L., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Researchers as evaluators: Tasks, tensions and politics. Higher Education, 62(2), 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levander, S. (2017). Den pedagogiska skickligheten och akademins väktare. Kollegial bedömning vid rekrytering av universitetslärare [Educational proficiency and the gatekeepers of Academia. Peer review in the recruitment of university teachers] (Diss). Uppsala University, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Levander, S., Forsberg, E., & Elmgren, M. (2019). The meaning-making of educational proficiency in academic hiring: A blind spot in the black box. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1576605
   Google Scholar
• Levander, S., & Riis, U. (2016). Assessing educational expertise in academic faculty promotion. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(2-3), 33759.
   Google Scholar
• Lucal, B., Albers, C., Ballantine, J., Burmeister-May, J., Chin, J., Dettmer, S., & Larson, S. (2003). Faculty assessment and the scholarship of teaching and learning: Knowledge available/knowledge needed. Teaching Sociology, 31(2), 146–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magin, D. J. (1998). Rewarding good teaching: A matter of demonstrated proficiency or documented achievement? International Journal for Academic Development, 3(2), 124–135.
   Google Scholar
• Meizlish, D., & Kaplan, M. (2008). Valuing and evaluating teaching in academic hiring: A multidisciplinary, cross-institutional study. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 489–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2008). Comparing research and teaching in university promotion criteria. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(3), 237–251.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M. B. (2002). Evaluating teaching performance. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002(114), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva, 1(1), 54–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E., & Clarke, S. (1995). Recognising and rewarding good teaching in Australian universities. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Schimanski, L., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in the academic promotion and tenure process: Past, present, and future. 1000Research, 5, 1605.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2004). Accreditation in the framework of evaluation activities: A comparative study in the European higher education area. In S. Schwartz & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area (pp. 1-41). Dordrecht: Springer Science Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Seldin, P., Miller, J. E., & Seldin, C. A. (2010). The teaching portfolio: A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1993). Teaching as community property. Change, 25(6), 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1973:54. (1973) Professorstillsättningen. Betänkande av en inom utbildningsdepartementet tillkallad utredning [The recruitment of professors. Governmental report]. Stockholm: The Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Soudien, C., & Gripper, D. (2016). The shifting sands of academic output: University of Cape Town research output in Education and Social Anthropology:1993–2013. Higher Education Policy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0011-y
   Google Scholar
• Subbaye, R. (2018). Teaching in academic promotions at South African universities: A policy perspective. Higher Education Policy, 31, 245–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaye, R., & Vithal, R. (2017). Teaching criteria that matter in university academic promotions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good research practice. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K. (2001). Judging university teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1), 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• UKÄ. (2019). Higher education institutions in Sweden (Report 2019: 12). Stockholm: Swedish Higher Education Authority.
   Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M. (2010). Behind the scenes of science: Gender practices in the recruitment and selection of professors in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlén, S. (2002). Teaching skills and academic rewards. Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, I. (2012). Peer review in the tenure and promotion process. Symposium on Peer Review, CCC 63(4/JUNE 2012), 645–672.
   Google Scholar