Taking a step back for a leap forward: policy formation for the digitalisation of schools from the views of Swedish national policymakers

References

• Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?.Frenchs Forest, N.S.W: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: Process, themes and impact. London: Routledge. Leadership for learning.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., & Braun, C. (2014). Ties that count: Explaining interest group access to policymakers. Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), 93–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2019). Digital education at school in Europe. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Fransson, G., Lindberg, J. O., & Olofsson, A. D. (2018). Adequate digital competence - A close reading of the new national strategy for digitalization of the schools in Sweden. Seminar.net: Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 14(2), 217–228.
   Google Scholar
• Galletta, A. (2012). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government decision I:1, Supplement to Government decision. (2017). Nationell Digitaliseringsstrategi För Skolväsendet [National Digitalisation Strategy for the School System]. Dnr U2017/04119/S. The Swedish Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2014). Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A. (2001). What is the policy problem? Methodological challenges in policy evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A., Carlbaum, S., Hult, A., Lindgren, L., & Lundström, U. (2016). School evaluation in Sweden in a local perspective: A synthesis. Education Inquiry, 7(3), 349–371.
   Google Scholar
• Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2016). Towards a new professionalism in school? A comparative study of teacher autonomy in Norway and Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 232–249.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. J., & Hupe, P. L. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Jarl, M., & Rönnberg, L. (2019). Skolpolitik: Från riksdagshus till klassrum [School politics: From Parliament building to classroom]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Nivala, M. (2009). Simple answers for complex problems: Education and ICT in Finnish information society strategies. Media, Culture & Society, 31(3), 433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin, A. (2016). Teacher professionalism beyond numbers: A communicative orientation. Policy Futures in Education, 14(6), 830–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, J. O., & Fransson, G. (2017). What do upper secondary school teachers want to know from research on the use of ICT and how does this inform a research design? Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2897–2914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, J. O., & Fransson, G. (2019). A study of the use of digital technology and its conditions with a view to understanding what “adequate digital competence” may mean in a national policy initiative. Educational Studies, 46(6), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2010). The OECD innovation strategy: Getting a head start on tomorrow. Paris/ OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., Ball, S. J., Braun, A., & Maguire, M. (2017). Translating policy: Governmentality and the reflective teacher. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 745–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – A review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranchod, R., & Vas, C. (2019). Policy networks revisited: Creating a researcher–policymaker community. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 15(1), 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Salmons, J. (2016). Designing and conducting research with online interviews. In J. Salmons (Ed.), Cases in online interview research (pp. 1–30). Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2018). Technology as a focus of education policy. In R. Papa & S. W. Armfield (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Educational Policy (pp. 457–477). Newark: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalised conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A. (2008). Implementation as iterative refraction. In J. A. Supovitz & E. H. Weinbaum (Eds.), The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools (pp. 151–172). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. A., & Weinbaum, E. H. (2008). Reform implementation revisited. In J. A. Supovitz & E. H. Weinbaum (Eds.), The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools (pp. 1–20). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions [SALAR]. (2019). #skolDigiplan Nationell handlingsplan för digitalisering av skolväsendet [#skolDigiplan National plan of action for the digitalisation of schools]. Sverigens Kommuner och Regioner. https://issuu.com/sverigeskommunerochlandsting/docs/7585-773-2
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education [SNAE]. (2017). Få syn på digitaliseringen på grundskolenivå : Ett kommentarmaterial till läroplanerna för förskoleklass, fritidshem och grundskoleutbildning [Discover digitalisation at the compulsory school level: A commentary to the curriculum for the preschool class, school-age educare and compulsory school]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education [SNAE]. (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare 2011. Stockholm: Author. (Revised 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring context, texts and consequences. Discourse (Abingdon, England), 18(1), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Van Keer, H., Van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Council [UNHRC]. (2016). Right to education in the digital age—Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. 11/ 28/2018. United Nations, General Assembly, Human Rights Council, April 6, A/HRC/32/37. https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/education/sreducation/pages/annualreports.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Lai, K.-W. (Eds.). (2018). Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S., & Brande, L. V. European Commission. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2011). Digitalising our schools: Clarity and coherence in policy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 326–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Player-Koro, C., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Education recoded: Policy mobilities in the international ‘learning to code’ agenda. Journal of Education Policy, 34(5), 705–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar