2,701
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

“The teacher educator’s perceptions of professional agency – a paradox of enabling and hindering digital professional development in higher education”

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • ,Swedish Research Council [Vetenskapsrådet]. (2017). God forskningssed (Good research practice). Retrieved from https://www.vr.se/analys/rapporter/vara-rapporter/2017-08-29-god-forskningssed.html
  • Ahlbäck Öberg, S., Bull, T., Hasselberg, Y., & Stenlås, N. (2016). Professions under siege. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 118(1), 93–126.
  • Amhag, L., Hellström, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 203–220.
  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.
  • Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, (15), 26.
  • Castells, M. (2000). Informationsåldern. Ekonomi, samhälle och kultur. Band I: Nätverkssamhällets framväxt.[The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume I: The rise of the network society] . Göteborg: Daidalos.
  • Demoskop. (2016). Teacher education and digitalization - a survey among Sweden’s teacher students. Retrieved from Online: http://www.berattarministeriet.se/undersokning/
  • Edwards, A., Montecinos, C., Cádiz, J., Jorratt, P., Manriquez, L., & Rojas, C. (2017). Working relationally on complex problems: Building capacity for joint agency in new forms of work. In Agency at work (pp. 229–247). Cham: Springer.
  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
  • Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.
  • European Commission. (2017). Digital Competence Framework for citizens, DigComp 2.1. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomp
  • European Commission. (2018). Communication from the european commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. on the digital education action plan. SWD (2018) final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2018:0022:FIN:EN:PDF
  • Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(12), 161–171.
  • Gandana, I., & Parr, G. (2013). Professional identity, curriculum and teachingIntercultural Communication: An Indonesian case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(3), 229–246.
  • Georgina, D. A., & Olson, M. R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1–8.
  • Goller, M., & Paloniemi, S. (2017). Agency at work, an agentic perspective on professional learning and development. Cham: Springer.
  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
  • Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231.
  • Harteis, C., & Goller, M. (2014). New skills for new jobs: Work agency as a necessary condition for successful lifelong learning. In Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2014). Seeking new perspectives on the development of teacher education: A study of the Finnish context. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 39–52.
  • Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Mahlakaarto, S. (2017). Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity – Transforming marginality to strength. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 36–46.
  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
  • Jääskelä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Teacher beliefs regarding learning, pedagogy, and the use of technology in higher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(34), 198–211.
  • Jenkins, N., Bloor, M., Fischer, J., Berney, L., & Neale, J. (2010). Putting it in context: The use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research, 10(2), 175–198.
  • Jonker H., März V., and Voogt J. (2018). Teacher educators' professional identity under construction: The transition from teaching face-to-face to a blended curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71 120–133.
  • Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.
  • Kohtamäki, V., & Balbachevsky, E. (2018). University autonomy: From past to present. Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on Higher Education Management and Transformation: An advanced reader for PhD students.
  • Kosnik, C., Miyata, C., Cleovoulou, Y., Fletcher, T., & Menna, L. (2015). The education of teacher educators, In Handbook of Canadian research in initial teacher education (pp. 207-224).Ottawa: Canadian Association of Teacher Education.
  • Krumsvik, R. J., Egelandsdal, K., Sarastuen, N. K., Jones, L. Ø., & Eikeland, O. J. (2013). Sammenhengen mellom IKT-bruk og læringsutbytte (SMIL) i videregående opplæring. Retrieved from Bergen http://www.ks.no/PageFiles/41685/Sluttrapport_SMIL.pdf
  • Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., & Churchill, D. (2011). A framework for developing pre‐service teachers’ competencies in using technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Media International, 48(2), 69–83.
  • Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812–819.
  • Madsen, S. S., Archard, S., & Thorvaldsen, S. (2018). How different national strategies of implementing digital technology can affect teacher educators. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(4), 7–23.
  • Martinovic, D., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Situating ICT in the teacher education program: Overcoming challenges, fulfilling expectations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 461–469.
  • Reading, C., & Doyle, H. (2013). Teacher educators as learners: Enabling learning while developing innovative practice in ICT-rich education. Australian Educational Computing, Special Edition: Teaching Teachers for the Future Project, 27(3), 109–116.
  • Roumbanis Viberg, A., Forslund Frykedal, K., & Hashemi Sofkova, S. (2019). Teacher educators’ perceptions of their profession in relation to the digitalization of society. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 1(1).
  • Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Cambridge: Polity.
  • Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions [Sveriges kommuner och regioner]. (2019). Nationell handlingsplan för digitalisering av skolväsendet (National action plan for digitalization of the school system). Retrieved from #skolDigiplanwebsite:
  • Swedish National Agency of Education [Skolverket]. (2017). Få syn på digitaliseringen på grundskolenivå – Ett kommentarmaterial till läroplanerna för förskoleklass, fritidshem och grundskoleutbildning. Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3783
  • Tomte, C., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Karstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers & Education, 84, 26–35.
  • Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23.
  • Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1–12.
  • Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21–44.
  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.
  • Watts, J., & Robertson, N. (2011). Burnout in university teaching staff: A systematic literature review. Educational Research, 53(1), 33–50.
  • Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. H. (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexity of everyday life. London: Sage Publication.