Continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analysing the experiences of academics from a South African university of technology

References

• Abera, G., Kedir, M., & Beyabeyin, M. (2017). The implementations and challenges of continuous assessment in public universities of Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kadri, H. M., Al-moamary, M. S., Roberts, C., & Van der vleuten, C. P. M. (2012). Exploring assessment factors contributing to students’ study strategies: Literature review. Medical Teacher, 34(sup1), S42–S50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amador, F., Martinho, A. P., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Caeiro, S., & Oliveira, C. P. (2015). Education for sustainable development in higher education: Evaluating coherence between theory and praxis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(6), 867–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwin, P. (2009). Analysing teaching-learning in higher education: Accounting for structure and agency. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Basson, R. (2007). A comparision of policies and practices in assessment in a further education institution, University of Stellenbosch]. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/1884
   Google Scholar
• Beets, P. (2009). Towards integrated assessment in South African higher education. In E. Bitzer (Ed.), Higher education in South Africa (pp. 183–202). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjælde, O., Jørgensen, T., & Lindberg, A. (2017). Continuous assessment in higher education in Denmark. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 12(23), 23.
   Google Scholar
• Cookson, C. J. (2018). Assessment terms half a century in the making and unmaking: From conceptual ingenuity to definitional anarchy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 930–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Holt, N. L. (2011). Grounded theory. In B. Somekh, and C. Lewin (Eds.), Theory and methods in social research (2nd ed., pp. 113–120). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Higher Education. (2009). Higher education monitor: The state of higher education in South Africa. South Africa: C. o. H. Education.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Higher Education. (2010). Teaching and learning beyond formal access: Assessment through the looking glass. (Vol. HE Monitor No. 10) Pretoria: CHE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Lisle, J. (2015). The promise and reality of formative assessment practice in a continuous assessment scheme: The case of Trinidad And Tobago. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 79–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lisle, J. (2016). Unravelling continuous assessment practice: Policy implications for teachers’ work and professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, J. G. (2009). The commons: Disciplinary and interdisciplinary encounters. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 35–49). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, C. T. (2006). What should make up a final mark for a course? An investigation into the academic performance of first year bioscience students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 345–364.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(14), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Durban University of Technology. (2019). Assessment policy (policy document). Durban: Durban Univerisity of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Durban University of Technology. (2020). DUT draft strategic plan 2020-2030 www.dut.ac.za
   Google Scholar
• Faculty of Health Sciences. (2014a). Minutes of the curriculum renewal meeting 16 April 2014. Durban: Durban University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Faculty of Health Sciences. (2014b). Minutes of the curriculum renewal meeting 19 March 2014. Durban: Durban University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Garraway, J., Vahed, A., Sunder, R., Reddy, P., Maharaj, M., Walters, M., & Seedat, N. (2019). Time travel through the polytechnic* to University Nexus: From heartfelt difficulties to new possibilities. Alternation, 28(4). http://alternation.ukzn.ac.za/Files/articles/special-editions/28/06-Garraway-F.pdf
   Google Scholar
• González, C. (2011). Extending research on ‘conceptions of teaching’: Commonalities and differences in recent investigations. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis 7th . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., & Deakin, C . (2002 A systemic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students' motivation for learning.). Research Evidence in Education Library (London: Institute of Education).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2017). Editorial: Fit for purpose: Lessons in assessment and learning. English in Education, 51(1), 5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, R. (2012). Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? Higher Education, 64(4), 489–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (Ed.). (2009). The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muskin, J. (2017). Continuous assessment for improved teaching and learning: A critical review to inform policy and practice Programme and Meeting Document. http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/MINEDU/5525
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Strivingto meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauli, M., & Ferrell, G. (2020). The future of assessment: Five principles, five targets for 2025 https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/the-future-of-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, K. F. (2014). Introduction to social research - Quantiative and qualitative approaches (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, N., & Sadler, I. (2017). Personal understanding of assessment and the link to assessment practice: The perspectives of higher education staff. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), 724–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2015). Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment: A literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 439–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonite, V. (2003). The impact of coursework on degree classifications and the performance of individual students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 459–470.
   Google Scholar
• Simper, N. (2020). Assessment thresholds for academic staff: Constructive alignment and differentiation of standards. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1718600
   Google Scholar
• South African Qualifications Authority. (2005). Guidelines for integrated assessment. SAQA. https://www.saqa.org.za/sites/default/files/2019-11/intassessment_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. (2011). Mid-year population release (Pretoria: Stats SA).
   Google Scholar
• Tarekegne, W. M. (2019). Higher education instructors perceptions and practice of active learning and continuous assessment techniques: The case of Jimma University. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education, 13(1), 50–70.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Ashwin, P. (2006). An exploratory study of situated conceptions of learning and learning environments. Higher Education, 51(2), 243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Briggs, G. (2018). To see or not to see? Comparing the effectiveness of examinations and end of module assessments in online distance learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1048–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Johannesburg. (n.d.). Guidelines for continuous assessment. Johannesburg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vahed, A., McKenna, S., & Singh, S. (2016). Linking the ‘know-that’ and ‘know-how’ knowledge through games: A quest to evolve the future for science and engineering education. Higher Education, 71(6), 781–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S., Salines, E., Abdillahi, A., Mason, S., Jadav, A., & Molesworth, C. (2019). Identifying and resolving key institutional challenges in feedback and assessment: A case study for implementing change. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 422–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. (2009). Assessment for career and citizenship. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The University and its Disciplines (pp. 221–230). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar