Students’ experiences of assessment and feedback engagement in digital contexts: a mixed-methods case study in upper secondary school

References

• Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545–557. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350–372. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balloo, K., Evans, C., Hughes, A., Zhu, X., & Winstone, N. (2018). Transparency isn’t spoon-feeding: How a transformative approach to the use of explicit assessment criteria can support student self-regulation. Frontiers in Education, 3(69). doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00069
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Rushby, J. V., Bostwick, K. C. P., & Sheridan, L. (2021). The power of feedback and reflection: Testing an online scenario-based learning intervention for student teachers. Computers & Education, 104194. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104194
   Google Scholar
• Batten, J., Jessop, T., & Birch, P. (2019). Doing what it says on the tin? A psychometric evaluation of the assessment experience questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 309–320. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1499867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2020). New directions for assessment in a digital world. In M. Bearman, P. Dawson, R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, & D. Boud (Eds.), Re-imagining university assessment in a digital world (pp. 7–18). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U., & Knutsson, O. (2020). Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Computers & Education, 149, 103783. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L. M., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., and Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117–140. doi:10.1177/1478210314566733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M., Roe, A., Dalland, C. P., & Klette, K. (2022). Homeschooling in Norway during the pandemic-digital learning with unequal access to qualified help at home and unequal learning opportunities provided by the school. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.), Primary and secondary education during Covid-19: Disruptions to educational opportunity during a pandemic (pp. 177–201). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81500-4_7
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2020). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 81(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372.
   Google Scholar
• Daus, S., Aamodt, P. O., & Tømte, C. E. (2019). Professional digital competence in teacher education: Examination of condition, attitudes and skills in five teacher education programmes (NIFU Report 3/2019). http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2602702
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). 6.3 Assessment in general upper secondary education. National Education Systems: Norway, https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/norway_en
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., Kvinge, L. M., Smith, K., & Engelsen, K. S. (2019). Developing teachers’ responsive pedagogy in mathematics, does it lead to short-term effects on student learning? Cogent Education, 6(1), 1676568. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2019.1676568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150–169. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2019). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education: A handbook for academic practitioners (2nd ed., pp. 22–35). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Dunbar‐Goddet, H. (2007). The effects of programme assessment environments on student learning. Oxfordshire, York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34(3), 269–290 doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.785384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, J. M., Pekrun, R., Taxer, J. L., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Emotion Regulation in Achievement Situations: An Integrated Model. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 106–126. 10.1080/00461520.2019.1587297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Dargusch, J. (2018). Not playing the game: Student assessment resistance as a form of agency. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 125–140. doi:10.1007/s13384-018-0264-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., Flórez Petour, M. T., & Tolo, A. (2015). Balancing tensions in educational policy reforms: Large-scale implementation of assessment for learning in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 44–60. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.996524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2021). Understanding feedback in online learning – A critical review and metaphor analysis. Computers & Education, 173, 104271. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787412467125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jónsson, Í. R., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). Shared language of feedback and assessment. Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 52–58. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkipää, T., & Hildén, R. (2021). What kind of feedback is perceived as encouraging by Finnish general upper secondary school students? Education Sciences, 11(1), 12. doi:10.3390/educsci11010012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecka, B., Boud, D., Tai, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Navigating feedback practices across learning contexts: Implications for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2041544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2019). Knowledge base for evaluation of the examination system. Ministry of Education and Research. https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/finn-forskning/rapporter/Kunnskapsgrunnlag-for-evaluering-av-eksamensordningen/
   Google Scholar
• Oinas, S., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Hotulainen, R. (2017). Technology-enhanced feedback for pupils and parents in Finnish basic education. Computers & Education, 108, 59–70. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S. (2013). Variations in grading practice – Subjects matter. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 22629. doi:10.3402/edui.v4i3.22629.
   Google Scholar
• Rovagnati, V., Pitt, E., & Winstone, N. (2022). Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: International postgraduate students’ experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 347–359. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1916431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84. doi:10.1080/0969595980050104.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik, L. V., Smith, K., Strømme, A., Svendsen, B., Aasmundstad Sommervold, O., & Aarønes Angvik, S. (2021). Students’ perceptions of assessment practices in upper secondary school during COVID-19. Teachers and Teaching, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13540602.2021.1982692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrader, C., & Grassinger, R. (2021). Tell me that I can do it better. The effect of attributional feedback from a learning technology on achievement emotions and performance and the moderating role of individual adaptive reactions to errors. Computers & Education, 161, 104028. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education?. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Silvola, A., Näykki, P., Kaveri, A., & Muukkonen, H. (2021). Expectations for supporting student engagement with learning analytics: An academic path perspective. Computers & Education, 168, 104192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2008). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, C. L., & Isaacs, T. (2022). Hong Kong secondary students’ perspectives on selecting test difficulty level and learner washback: Effects of a graded approach to assessment. Language Testing, 39(2), 212–238. doi:10.1177/02655322211050600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kleij, F. M., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. J. (2019). A meta-review of the student role in feedback. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 303–323. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. doi:10.3102/0034654314564881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vattøy, K.-D., Gamlem, S. M., & Rogne, W. M. (2021). Examining students’ feedback engagement and assessment experiences: A mixed study. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2325–2337. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1723523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittle, D., & Campbell, M. (2019). A guide to digital feedback loops: An approach to strengthening program outcomes through data for decision making. USAID. Accessed 12 August 2022. https://www.usaid.gov/digital-development/digital-feedback-loops
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., & Rees, R. (2021). “Check the grade, log out”: Students’ engagement with feedback in learning management systems. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 631–643. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., & Adie, L. (2019). The development of students’ evaluative expertise: Enabling conditions for integrating criteria into pedagogic practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–21. doi:10.1080/00220272.2019.1624831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2015). Effective feedback design using free technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 408–434. doi:10.1177/0735633115571929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar