Differences between a teacher educator’s and prospective classroom teacher’s talk-based strategies for fostering academically productive classroom talk

References

• Aitken, G., Sinnema, C., & Meyer, F. (2013). Initial teacher education outcomes: Standards for graduating teachers. Auckland: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. (2010). Speaking but not listening? Accountable talk in an unaccountable context. Literacy, 44(3), 103–111. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2010.00562.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. J. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching : Rethinking classroom talk (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Alger, C., & Kopcha, T. J. (2011). Technology supported cognitive apprenticeship transforms the student teaching field experience: Improving the student teaching field experience for all triad members. The Teacher Educator, 46(1), 71–88. doi:10.1080/08878730.2010.529986
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, G., Hunter, J., & Hunter, R. (2015). Prospective teachers development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108–117. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, G. (2018). Teacher discursive moves: Conceptualising a schema of dialogic discourse in science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1891–1912. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1514543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. D. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756–766. doi:10.1177/1745691620969647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouton, E., & Asterhan, C. (2023). Quantifying differences in students’ participation patterns in classroom discussions. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning-CSCL 2023 (pp. 147–154). Germany: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., & Rubin, D. (2006). How contingent questioning promotes extended student talk: A function of display questions. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 141–169. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantley-Dias, L., Puvirajah, A., & Dias, M. (2021). Supporting teacher candidates’ multidimensional reflection: A model and a protocol. Reflective Practice, 22(2), 187–202. doi:10.1080/14623943.2020.1865904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buma, A., & Nyamupangedengu, E. (2020). Investigating teacher talk moves in lessons on basic genetics concepts in a teacher education classroom. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 24(1), 92–104. doi:10.1080/18117295.2020.1731647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A. R., Hand, B., & Premo, J. (2020). Supporting student agency in science. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 128–138. doi:10.1080/00405841.2019.1702392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. doi:10.1080/09500690600621100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Grudnoff, L., Orland-Barak, L., & Smith, K. (2020). Educating teacher educators: International perspectives. The New Educator, 16(1), 5–24. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2019.1670309
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Villegas, A. M., Abrams, L., Chavez-Moreno, L., Mills, T., & Stern, R. (2015). Critiquing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part II. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 109–121. doi:10.1177/0022487114558268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014a). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. doi:10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A. & Francisco, R. T. (2014b). Identifying kinds of reasoning in collective argumentation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(3), 181–200. doi:10.1080/10986065.2014.921131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). United Kingdom: SAGE Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. J., & Esling, S. (2020). The use of quality talk to foster critical thinking in a low socio-economic secondary geography classroom. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 43(1), 109–122. doi:10.1007/BF03652047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, E., & Choudhry, F. (2018). Talking the talk: Exploring teacher learning and their use of discourse strategies. School Science and Mathematics, 118(7), 273–289. doi:10.1111/ssm.12297
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C. (2018). Knowing pedagogical dialogues for learning: Establishing a repertoire of classroom interaction practices as core teaching practice. Contemporary Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Development. doi:10.5772/intechopen.78968
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C., & Hoare, R. (2012). “Talking to learn”: Focussing teacher education on dialogue as a core practice for teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 82–100. doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n8.8
   Google Scholar
• Ell, F., & Grudnoff, L. (2013). The politics of responsibility: Teacher education and “persistent underachievement” in New Zealand. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 73–86. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.739023
   Google Scholar
• Erdemir, N., & Yeşilçınar, S. (2021). Reflective practices in micro teaching from the perspective of preservice teachers: Teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 22(6), 766–781. doi:10.1080/14623943.2021.1968818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrelly, M. J., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2021). Strategies used and challenges faced by Thai EFL teachers when eliciting talk during classroom interactions in high school contexts. SAGE Open, 11(4), 215824402110503. doi:10.1177/21582440211050385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischetti, J., Ledger, S., Lynch, D., & Donnelly, D. (2022). Practice before practicum: Simulation in initial teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 57(2), 155–174. doi:10.1080/08878730.2021.1973167
   Google Scholar
• Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., & Haring, C. D. (2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children & Youth, 61(2), 163–169. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2016.1231109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207–245. doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.689383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 200–209. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunel, M., & Tanriverdi, K. (2014). In-service teacher training from international and national perspectives: The retention and loss of institutional and academic memories. Education and Science, 39(175), 73–94. doi:10.15390/EB.2014.2949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutentag, T., Orner, A., & Asterhan, C. S. (2022). Classroom discussion practices in online remote secondary school settings during COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107250. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., & Manz, E. (2019). Odd ideas about learning science: A response to Osborne. Science Education, 103(5), 1289–1293. doi:10.1002/sce.21538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, P., Jr, Abib, G., & Hoppen, N. (2019). Validity in qualitative research: A processual approach. The Qualitative Report, 24(1), 98–112. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2018). What is a case study? Evidence-Based Nursing, 21(1), 7–8. doi:10.1136/eb-2017-102845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hennessy, S., Howe, C., Mercer, N., & Vrikki, M. (2020). Coding classroom dialogue: Methodological considerations for researchers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100–404. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, J. E., McKeny, T., Foley, G. D., & Balong, M. (2014). Mathematics discussions by design: Creating opportunities for purposeful participation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(6), 453–479. doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9224-1
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2012). On the instructional triangle and sources of justification for actions in mathematics teaching. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(5), 601–612. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0438-6
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Chiu, M. M., Yelland, N., & Liang, Y. (2023). Scaffolding young children’s computational thinking with teacher talk in a technology-mediated classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Miller, B. W., Kim, I.-H., & Wu, X. (2011). Influence of a Teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 194–230. doi:10.3102/0002831210371498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206. doi:10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakaş, A., & Yükselir, C. (2021). Engaging pre-service EFL teachers in reflection through video-mediated team micro-teaching and guided discussions. Reflective Practice, 22(2), 159–172. doi:10.1080/14623943.2020.1860927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayima, F., & Jakobsen, A. (2020). Exploring the situational adequacy of teacher questions in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 437–467. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9696-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khong, T. D. H., Saito, E., & Gillies, R. M. (2019). Key issues in productive classroom talk and interventions. Educational Review, 71(3), 334–349. doi:10.1080/00131911.2017.1410105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi:10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kıryak, Z., Çalık, M., & Özmen, H. (2024). Improving seventh-grade students’ scientific vocabulary and communicative interactions: A case of the “cell and divisions” subject. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10763-024-10448-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, J., & Kramer, C. (2016). Teacher professional knowledge and classroom management: On the relation of general pedagogical knowledge (GPK) and classroom management expertise (CME). International Journal on Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 139–151. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0705-4
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E., & Kim, K. T. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of effective teacher talk: Their critical reflections on a sample teacher-student dialogue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(3), 363–381. doi:10.1007/s10649-016-9710-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., Vedder-Weiss, D., & Segal, A. (2020). Relocating research on teacher learning: Toward pedagogically productive talk. Educational Researcher, 49(5), 360–368. doi:10.3102/0013189X20922998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., Lehtinen, A., Hämäläinen, R., Maunuksela, J., & Koskinen, P. (2023). Student-centredness in physics laboratory teaching sessions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 43, 100773. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, K. (2009). Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Education, 23(6), 541–560. doi:10.1080/09500780902822942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue (pp. 333–347). Washington DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moussay, S., Flavier, E., Zimmermann, P., & Méard, J. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ greater power to act in the classroom: Analysis of the circumstances for professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), 465–482. doi:10.1080/02619768.2011.587117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesje, K., & Lejonberg, E. (2022). Tools for the school-based mentoring of pre-service teachers: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, 103609. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokes, D. J., Bullough, R. V., Egan, W. M., Birrell, J. R., & Hansen, M. (2008). The paired-placements of student teachers: An alternative to traditional placements in secondary schools. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research & Studies, 24(8), 2168–2177. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., Dove, I., & Putney, L. (2023). Bridging dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory through critical questions. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 11(3), A7–A25. doi:10.5195/dpj.2023.548
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F. (2019). Not “hands on” but “minds on”: A response to Furtak and Penuel. Science Education, 103(5), 1280–1283. doi:10.1002/sce.21543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A. K., Zenkov, K., & Glaser, H. (2021). Preparing school-based teacher educators: Mentor teachers’ perceptions of mentoring and mentor training. Peabody Journal of Education, 96(1), 65–75. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2021.1877027
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, C. (2020). Co-teaching: Collaborative and caring teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 135–147. doi:10.1177/0022487119872696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446–456. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Glina, M. (2013). Comparing student experiences with story discussions in dialogic versus traditional settings. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 49–63. doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.658458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114–133. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruys, I., Van Keer, H., & Aelterman, A. (2011). Student teachers’ skills in the implementation of collaborative learning: A multilevel approach. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research & Studies, 27(7), 1090–1100. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M. N. K., & Townsend, K. (2018). Choosing participants. In C. Cassell, A. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative business and management research methods (pp. 480–494). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. doi:10.1002/sce.20131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & Jacobs, V. R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. Sherin, V. Jacobs & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 33–44). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., & Avetisian, V. (2011). Learning to teach with two mentors: Revisiting the “two worlds pitfall” in student teaching. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 335–354. doi:10.1080/08878730.2011.604400
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. (2019). Indicators of productive classroom talk and supporting discourse moves: A systematic review for effective science teaching. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 114–137. doi:10.31805/aebd.642246
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. (2020). Determining the mechanics of classroom discourse in vygotskian sense: Teacher discursive moves reconsidered. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1639–1663. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9747-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. (2021). Exploring elementary and middle school science teachers’ metadiscourse moves: A Vygotskian analysis and interpretation. Learning: Research and Practice, 7(1), 70–104. doi:10.1080/23735082.2020.1761432
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. (2023a). Understanding linkage between teacher talk moves, discourse contexts and students’ talk productivity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1452–1479. doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.2012648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y. (2023b). Exploring middle school science teachers’ error-reaction patterns by classroom discourse analysis. Science & Education, 1–41. doi:10.1007/s11191-023-00431-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2018). Social negotiations of meanings and changes in the beliefs of prospective teachers: A Vygotskian perspective. Educational Studies, 44(1), 57–80. doi:10.1080/03055698.2017.1345676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y., & Radmard, S. (2020). Research into teacher educators’ discursive moves: A Vygotskian perspective. Journal of Education, 200(1), 32–47. doi:10.1177/0022057419875120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y., & Soysal, S. (2022a). Exploring prospective classroom teacher question types for productive classroom dialogue. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311221109283.209653112211092. doi:10.1177/20965311221109283
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y., & Soysal, S. (2022b). Relationship between a teacher educator’s questions and the development of prospective teachers’ critical thinking. ECNU Review of Education, 6(1), 105–140. doi:10.1177/20965311221107028
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y., & Soysal, S. (2023). Describing teacher educators’ metatalk moves enacted for teaching how to teach concepts. Education Inquiry, 1–33. doi:10.1080/20004508.2023.2299055
   Google Scholar
• Soysal, Y., & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2021). Relationships between teacher discursive moves and middle school students’ cognitive contributions to science concepts. Research in Science Education, 51(S1), 325–367. doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09881-1
   Google Scholar
• Steuer, G., Rosentritt-Brunn, G., & Dresel, M. (2013). Dealing with errors in mathematics classrooms: Structure and relevance of perceived error climate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 196–210. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S. (2017). Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis. Science Education, 101(4), 548–583. doi:10.1002/sce.21275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., & Chen, G. (2023). Coding schemes and analytic indicators for dialogic teaching: A systematic review of the literature. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 39, 100702. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiainen, O., Korkeamäki, R. L., & Dreher, M. J. (2018). Becoming reflective practitioners: A case study of three beginning pre-service teachers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(4), 586–600. doi:10.1080/00313831.2016.1258673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulis, M., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M. (2018). Positive beliefs about errors as an important element of adaptive individual dealing with errors during academic learning. Educational Psychology, 38(2), 139–158. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1384536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. W. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech.N. Minick). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton), L. S. Vygotsky (Eds. Problems of general psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Tao, Y., & Chen, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade. International Journal of Educational Research, 123, 102275. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, L., Uçak, E., & Genç, M. (2023). Comparing socioscientific teacher roles, communicative approaches, and discourse patterns while teaching socioscientific issues as well as standard science subjects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–36. doi:10.1007/s10763-023-10432-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 117–124. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar