1,823
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Research Article

Follow up of MRI bone marrow edema in the treated diabetic Charcot foot – a review of patient charts

, ORCID Icon, &
Article: 1466611 | Received 24 Jan 2018, Accepted 12 Apr 2018, Published online: 26 Apr 2018

References

  • Edmonds E, Petrova NL, Elias D. The earliest magnetic resonance imaging sign of mid-foot Charcot osteoarthropathy is oedema of subchondral (subarticular) bone marrow which needs prompt therapeutic offloading. Abstract. Diabet Med. 2005;22(Suppl.2):1.
  • Edmonds ME, Petrova NL, Edmonds AE, et al. What happens to the initial bone marrow oedema in the natural history of Charcot osteoarthropathy? Abstract. Diabetologia. 2006;49(Suppl.1):684.
  • Chantelau E, Richter A, Schmidt-Grigoriadis P, et al. The diabetic Charcot foot: MRI discloses bone stress injury as trigger mechanism of neuroarthropathy. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006;114:118–8.
  • Zampa V, Bargelli I, Rizzo L, et al. Role of dynamic MRI in the follow-up of acute Charcot foot in patients with diabetes mellitus. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:991–999.
  • Ruotolo V, DiPietro B, Giurato L, et al. A new natural history of Charcot foot. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:506–509.
  • Peicha G, Preidler KW, Lajtai G, et al. Reliability of conventional radiography, CT and MRI in the diagnosis of acute hyperflexion trauma to the foot. A prospective clinical study [Article in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2001;1004:1134–1139.
  • Niva MH, Somaala MJ, Kiuru MJ, et al. Bone stress injuries of the ankle and foot: an 86-month magnetic resonance imaging-based study of physically active adults. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(4):643–649.
  • Zanetti M, Bruder F, Romero J, et al. Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees. Correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology. 2000;215:835–840.
  • Blum A, Lecocq S, Loeuille D. Bone marrow edema aids diagnosis and prognosis. Diagnostic Imaging 2010 October 29 1–6. http://www.diagnosticimaging.com.
  • Vanhoenacker FM, Eyselbergs M, Demeyere A. Bone marrow changes in acute and chronic trauma. In: Baur-Melnyk A, editors. Magnetic resonance imaging of the bone marrow. Medical radiology, diagnostic imaging. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer; 2013. p. 265–292.
  • Kiuru MJ, Philajamaki HK, Ahovuo JA. Bone stress injuries. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:317–326.
  • Tervonen O, Junila J, Ojala R. MR imaging in tibial shaft fractures. A potential method for visualization of delayed union. Acta Radiologica. 1999;40:401–414.
  • Krüger K, Heindel W, Burger C, et al. MR tomographic imaging of uncomplicated secondary fracture healing: distal radius fracture as an example [Article in German]. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1999;170:262–268.
  • Fujii M, Terashi H, Tahara S. Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing osteomyelitis in diabetic foot ulcers. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014;104:24–29.
  • Duryea D, Bernard S, Flemming D, et al. Outcomes in diabetic foot ulcer patients with isolated T2 marrow signal abnormality in the underlying bone: should the diagosis of ‘osteitis’ be changed into ‘early osteomyelitis’? Skeletal Radiol. 2017. Epub ahead of print.
  • Szczesny G, Olszewski WL. The pathomechanism of posttraumatic edema of the lower limbs: II-changes in the lymphatic system. J Trauma. 2003;55:350–354.
  • Kimmerle R, Chantelau E. Weight-bearing intensity produces Charcot deformity in injured neuropathic feet in diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007;115:360–364.
  • Valabhji J. Immunosuppression therapy posttransplantation can be associated with a different clinical phenotype for diabetic Charcot foot neuroarthropathy. Online Letter. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:e135.
  • Chantelau EA, Grützner G. Is the Eichenholtz classification still valid for the diabetic Charcot foot? Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13948.
  • Arendt EA, Griffiths HJ. The use of MR imaging in the assessment and clinical management of stress reactions of bone in high-performance athletes. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16(2):291–306.
  • Edmonds ME, Mulholland N, D’sa A, et al. The advantages of SPECT/CT in demonstrating the early bone and joint pathologies in patients with Charcot foot. Abstract P 347. Diabet Med. 2011;28(Suppl.1):136.
  • Fosbol M, Reving S, Petersen EH, et al. Three-phase bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy in the diabetic foot- does quantitative data improve diagnostic value? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017;37:30–36.
  • Sujlana P, Skrok J, Fayad LM. Review of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: technical aspects and application in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:875–890.
  • Christensen TM, Gade-Rasmussen B, Pedersen LW, et al. Duration of off-loading and recurrence rate in Charcot osteo-arthropathy treated with less restrictive regimen with removable walker. J Diabetes Compl. 2012;26:430–434.
  • Chantelau EA, Richter A. The acute diabetic Charcot foot managed on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging- a review of 71 cases. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13831.
  • Trappeniers L, De Maeseneer M, De Ridder F, et al. Can bone marrow edema be seen on STIR images of the ankle and foot after 1 week of running? Eur J Radiol. 2003;47:25–28.
  • Sandberg OH, Aspenberg P. Inter-trabecular bone formation: a specific mechanism for healing of cancellous bone. A narrative review. Acta Orthopaedica. 2016;87(5):459–465.
  • Ariyoshi M, Nagata K, Kubo M, et al. MR monitoring of tarsal navicular stress fracture healing. A case report. Kurume Med J. 1998;45:223–225.
  • Boks SS, Vroegindeweij D, Koes BW, et al. MRI follow-up of posttraumatic bone bruises of the knee in general practice. AJR. 2007;189:556–562.
  • Marsell R, Einhorn TA. The biology of fracture healing. Injury. 2011;42:551–555.
  • Shabestari M, Vik J, Reseland JE, et al. Bone marrow lesions in hip osteoarthritis are characterized by increased bone turnover and enhanced angiogenesis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24:1745–1752.
  • Vetter A, Epari DR, Seidel R, et al. Temporal tissue pattern in bone healing of sheep. J Orthop Res. 2010;28:1440–1447.
  • Pearson RG, Shu KSS, Lowe J, et al. Histological features of acute Charcot neuroarthropathy in diabetes. Abstract. Diabetologia. 2011;54(Suppl 1):S11.
  • La Fontaine J, Shibuya N, Sampson HW, et al. Trabecular quality and cellular characteristics of normal, diabetic and Charcot bone. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;56:648–653.
  • Molligan J, Barr C, Mitchell R, et al. Pathological role of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in Charcot neuroarthropathy. J Orthop Res. 2016;34:224–230.
  • Furman BD, Kimmerling KA, Zura RD, et al. Articular ankle fracture results in increased synovitis, synovial macrophage infiltration, and synovial fluid concentration of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1234–1239.
  • Cassuto J, Folestad A, Göthlin J, et al. The key role of proinflammatory cytokines, matrix proteins, RANKL/OPG and Wnt/ß-catenin in bone healing of hip arthroplasty patients. Bone. 2018;107:66–77.
  • Poll LW, Weber P, Böhm HJ, et al. Sudeck’s disease stage 1, or diabetic Charcot’s foot stage 0? Case report and assessment of the diagnostic value of MRI. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010;2:60.
  • Wikeroy AKB, Clarke-Jenssen J, Ovre SA, et al. The natural history of bone bruise and bone remodelling in the traumatised hip. A prospective 2-year follow-up study of bone bruise changes and DEXA measurements in 13 patients with conservatively treated traumatic hip dislocations and/or fractures. Injury. 2012;43:1672–1677.
  • Schell H, Epari DR, Kassi JP, et al. The course of bone healing is influenced by the initial shear fixation stability. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1022–1028.
  • Thorning C, Gedroyc WMW, Tyler PA, et al. Midfoot and hindfoot bone marrow edema identified by magnetic resonance imaging in feet of subjects with diabetes and neuropathic ulceration is common but of unknown clinical significance. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1602–1603.
  • Elias I, Zoga AC, Schweitzer ME, et al. A specific bone marrow edema around the foot and ankle following trauma and immobilization therapy: pattern description and potential clinical relevance. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:463–471.
  • Edmonds ME, Edmonds A, Elias D, et al. CT scans reveal the full extent of bone and joint damage of the Charcot foot. Abstract. Diabetic Med. 2010;27(Suppl.1):18.
  • Schon LC, Weinfeld SB, Horton GA, et al. Radiographic and clinical classification of aquired midtarsus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:394–404.
  • Meacock L, Petrova NL, Donaldson A, et al. Novel semiquantitative bone marrow oedema score and fracture score for the magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the active charcot foot in diabetes. J Diab Res. 2017;2017:8504137.
  • Baron K, Neumayer B, Amerstorfer E, et al. Time-dependent changes in T1 during fracture healing in juvenile rats: a quantitative MR approach. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0164284.
  • Gooday C. A randomised feasibility study to assess the use of serial magnetic resonance imaging to reduce treatment times in Charcot neuroarthropathy in people with diabetes. [cited 2018 Feb 21]. Available from: http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN74101606.