Smoking increases donor site complications in breast reconstruction with DIEP flap

References

• Healy C, Allen RJ. Sr. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014;30:121–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ. Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:571–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM, et al. The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Breast 2013;22:938–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantak NA, Koolen PG, Martin C, et al. Are patients with low body mass index candidates for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction? Microsurgery 2015;35:421–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang DW, Reece GP, Wang B, et al. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:2374–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JA, Chung CU, Fischer JP, et al. Wound healing complications after autologous breast reconstruction: a model to predict risk. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:531–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1153–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booi DI, Debats IB, Boeckx WD, van der Hulst RR. Risk factors and blood flow in the free transverse rectus abdominis (TRAM) flap: smoking and high flap weight impair the free TRAM flap microcirculation. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:364–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, et al. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1100–9; discussion 10–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL, et al. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1640–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung CU, Wink JD, Nelson JA, et al. Surgical Site Infections after Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of 2,899 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP Datasets. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015;31:434–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araco A, Gravante G, Sorge R, et al. Wound infections in aesthetic abdominoplasties: the role of smoking. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:305e–10e.
   Google Scholar
• Klasson S, Svensson H, Malm K, et al. Preoperative CT angiography versus Doppler ultrasound mapping of abdominal perforator in DIEP breast reconstructions: A randomized prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:782–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan AT, Al-Ajam Y, Mosahebi A. Trends in tertiary breast reconstruction: literature review and single centre experience. Breast 2013;22:173–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine SM, Levine A, Raghubir J, Levine JP. A 10-year review of breast reconstruction in a university-based public hospital. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:376–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta R, Smit JM, Audolfsson T, et al. A clinical review of 9 years of free perforator flap breast reconstructions: an analysis of 675 flaps and the influence of new techniques on clinical practice. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011;27:91–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T, Tonnesen H. Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2002;359:114–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubino C, Ramakrishnan V, Figus A, et al. Flap size/flow rate relationship in perforator flaps and its importance in DIEAP flap drainage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1666–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL, et al. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1086–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick LR, Walton RL, Reus W, et al. Free flaps in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serletti JM, Higgins JP, Moran S, Orlando GS. Factors affecting outcome in free-tissue transfer in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:66–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malata CM, Cooter RD, Batchelor AG, et al. Microvascular free-tissue transfers in elderly patients: the leeds experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:1234–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santanelli F, Longo B, Cagli B, et al. Predictive and protective factors for partial necrosis in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: does nulliparity bias flap viability? Ann Plast Surg 2015;74:47–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SA, Keller A. A theoretical model describing arterial flow in the DIEP flap related to number and size of perforator vessels. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1316–20; discussion 20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover R, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, et al. The impact of perforator number on deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:63–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumann DP, Lin HY, Chevray PM. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1335–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:395–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrett BM, Caterson SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. DIEP flaps in women with abdominal scars: are complication rates affected? Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1527–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin R, Elander A, Thorarinsson A, et al. A randomized prospective study of prophylactic cloxacillin in breast reduction surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2015;74:17–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannucci CJ, Chang EY, Wilkins EG. Venous thromboembolic disease in autogenous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009;63:34–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asopa V, Cobain W, Martin D, et al. Staged venous thromboemolic events prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin followed by aspirin is safe and effective after arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2015;85:652–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman KB, Brookenthal KR, Fitzgerald RH, Jr., et al. A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis following elective total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82-A:929–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar