References
- Simpson JG, Furnace J, Crosby J, et al. The Scottish doctor – learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Med Teach 2002;24:136–43.
- Rees-Lee JE, Lee S. Reaching our successors: the trend for early specialisation and the potential effect on recruitment to our speciality. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1135–8.
- Al-Nuaimi Y, McGrouther G, Bayat A. Modernizing medical careers in the UK and plastic surgery as a possible career choice: undergraduate opinions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:1472–4.
- Austin RE, Wanzel KR. Supply versus demand: a review of application trends to Canadian surgical training programs. Can J Surg 2015;58:143–4.
- Prater MA, Smith DJ Jr. Determining undergraduate curriculum content in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:529–33.
- Tubbs RS, Sorenson EP, Sharma A, et al. The development of a core syllabus for the teaching of head and neck anatomy to medical students. Clin Anat 2014;27:321–30.
- Almeland SK, Guttormsen AB, de Weerd L, et al. Plastic surgery in the Norwegian undergraduate medical curriculum: students’ knowledge and attitudes. A nationwide case-control study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;51:136–42.
- Tahiri Y, Lee J, Kanevsky J, et al. The differing perceptions of plastic surgery between potential applicants and current trainees: the importance of clinical exposure and electives for medical students. Can J Plast Surg 2013;21:178–80.
- Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, et al. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research. Med Teach 2017;39:14–19.
- Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 1995;311:376–80.
- Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 1998;2:i–iv.
- Edgren G. Developing a competence-based core curriculum in biomedical laboratory science: a Delphi study. Med Teach 2006;28:409–17.
- Santen SA, Peterson WJ, Khandelwal S, et al. Medical student milestones in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:905–11.
- Moxham BJ, Plaisant O, Smith CF, et al. An approach toward the development of core syllabuses for the anatomical sciences. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7:302–11.
- Skirton H, Barnoy S, Ingvoldstad C, et al. A Delphi study to determine the European core curriculum for Master programmes in genetic counselling. Eur J Hum Genet 2013;21:1060–6.
- Broomfield D, Humphris GM. Using the Delphi technique to identify the cancer education requirements of general practitioners. Med Educ 2001;35:928–37.
- Dunkin CS, Pleat JM, Jones SA, et al. Perception and reality—a study of public and professional perceptions of plastic surgery. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:437–43.
- Tanna N, Patel NJ, Azhar H, et al. Professional perceptions of plastic and reconstructive surgery: what primary care physicians think. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:643–50.
- Woudenberg F. An evaluation of Delphi. Technol Forecast Soc Change 1991;40:131–50.
- Richardson FM. Peer review of medical care. Med Care 1972;10:29–39.
- Bloor M, Sampson H, Baker S, et al. Useful but no Oracle: reflections on the use of a Delphi Group in a multi-methods policy research study. Qual Res 2015;15:57–70.
- Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2006;53:205–12.
- Goodman CM. The Delphi technique: a critique. J Adv Nurs 1987;12:729–34.
- Ito C, Ota K, Matsuda M. Educational content in nurse education in Japan: a Delphi study. Nurs Ethics 2011;18:441–54.
- de Blacam C, Kilmartin D, McDermott C, et al. Public perception of plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:197–204.