Objective evaluation of nipple position after 336 breast reductions

References

• Chadbourne EB, Zhang S, Gordon MJ, et al. Clinical outcomes in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:503–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwuagwu OC, Stanley PW, Platt AJ, et al. Effects of bilateral breast reduction on anxiety and depression: results of a prospective randomised trial. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40:19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdiu A, Elander A, Gerdin B, et al. Bröstreduktionsplastik – bröstförminskade kirurgi vid stor byst. Rapport från experttgruppen för plastikkirurgi: Sverges Kommuner och Landsting; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Brody GS. The perfect breast: is it attainable? Does it exist? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1500–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn J. Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg. 1954;7:357–371.
   Google Scholar
• Westreich M. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100:468–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Thomson JG. Ideal anthropomorphic values of the female breast: correlation of pluralistic aesthetic evaluations with objective measurements. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 67:7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DJ Jr, Palin WE Jr, Katch VL, Bennett JE. Breast volume and anthropomorphic measurements: normal values. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78:331–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Findlay EJ. Aesthetic breast surgery. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mallucci P, Branford OA. Shapes, proportions, and variations in breast aesthetic ideals: the definition of breast beauty, analysis, and surgical oractice. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42: 451–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallucci P, Branford OA. Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallucci P, Branford OA. Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134:436–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson E. Ideal breast shape: women prefer convexity and upper pole fullness. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135:641e–643e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabie A, Delay E, Chavoin JP, et al. [Plastic surgery application in artistic studies of breast cosmetic]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2006;51:142–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewin R, Amoroso M, Plate N, et al. The aesthetically ideal position of the nipple–areola complex on the breast. Aesth Plast Surg. 2016;40:724–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, et al. Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:186e–194e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin R, Elander A, Thorarinsson A, et al. A randomized prospective study of prophylactic cloxacillin in breast reduction surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:17–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom H, Lossing C. Reduction mammaplasty with a sliding nipple technique. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1990;24:245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomqvist G, Alberius P. Nipple–areola transposition by the superolateral-rotation pedicle technique in reduction mammaplasty: surgical description. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;24: 475–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159:702–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching S, Rockwell G, Thoma A, Antony MM. Clinical research in aesthetic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35: 269–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:469–480. discussion 81-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiting LB, Henriksen TF, Kalialis LV, et al. A prospective study of short- and long-term cosmetic outcome after reduction mammaplasty from three different perspectives: the patient. A department surgeon, and an independent private practitioner in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno H, Dionisopoulos T, Slavin SA, et al. The utility of outcome studies in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2:e189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christie D, O'Brien M, Christie J. A comparison of methods of cosmetic assessment in breast conservation treatment. Breast. 1996;5:358–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson E. Prospective photographic measurement study of 196 cases of breast augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:802e–819e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson E. Photometric evaluation of inframammary crease level after cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30: 832–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin Y, del Pilar Schneider M. The spring-back phenomenon: does the final position of the nipple areola complex correspond to the pre-operative markings in reduction mammoplasty? Eur J Plast Surg. 2007;29:361–367.
   Google Scholar
• Altuntas ZK, Kamburoglu HO, Yavuz N, et al. Long-term changes in nipple-areolar complex position and inferior pole length in superomedial pedicle inverted 't' scar reduction mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg. 2015;39: 325–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar