Long-term outcomes of bilateral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction in women at high breast cancer risk

References

• Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:967–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1633–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Jager A, et al. Substantial breast cancer risk reduction and potential survival benefit after bilateral mastectomy when compared with surveillance in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective analysis. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2029–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaas R, Verhoef S, Wesseling J, et al. Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: very low risk for subsequent breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:488–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1055–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malata CM, McIntosh SA, Purushotham AD. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1455–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosson GD, Magarakis M, Shridharani SM, et al. A review of the surgical management of breast cancer: plastic reconstructive techniques and timing implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1890–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardi AM, Ho-Asjoe M, Mohanna PN, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: factors affecting outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1098–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colakoglu S, Khansa I, Curtis MS, et al. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1428–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila AA, Mioton LM, Chow G, et al. Immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction compared with one-stage permanent implant breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of short-term complications. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47:344–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT, 3rd, et al. Risk analysis of early implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 14,585 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:983–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion SM, Slezak JM, Sellers TA, et al. Reoperations after prophylactic mastectomy with or without implant reconstruction. Cancer. 2003;98:2152–2160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wink JD, Fischer JP, Nelson JA, et al. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1612 cases from the ACS-NSQIP surgical outcomes database. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014;48:375–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damen TH, Mureau MA, Timman R, et al. The pleasing end result after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a review of additional operations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peled AW, Duralde E, Foster RD, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:S48–S52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslow S, Pharmer LA, Scott AM, et al. Long-term patient-reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implant reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3422–3429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgarello M, Rochira D, Barone-Adesi L, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction after skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy for previously augmented patients: a personal technique. Aesth Plast Surg. 2012;36:313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy CM, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants. Cancer. 2010;116:5584–5591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R, et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:686–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster RH, Rotter S, Boonn W, et al. The use of tissue expanders in immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43:413–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser NJ, Damen TH, Timman R, et al. Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolenburgh SE, Mureau MA, Hofer SO. Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: patient versus panel perception. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1459–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar