Scaphoid fracture geometrics: an assessment of location and orientation

References

• McQueen M, Gelbke M, Wakefield A, et al. Percutaneous screw fixation versus conservative treatment for fractures of the waist of the scaphoid: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Clay N, Dias J, Costigan P, et al. Need the thumb be immobilised in scaphoid fractures? A randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:828–832.
   Google Scholar
• Smith BS, Cooney WP. Revision of failed bone grafting for nonunion of the scaphoid: treatment options and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;327:98–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hambidge J, Desai V, Schranz P, et al. Acute fractures of the scaphoid treatment by cast immobilisation with the wrist in flexion or extension? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:91–92.
   Google Scholar
• Trumble TE, Clarke T, Kreder HJ. Non-union of the scaphoid. Treatment with cannulated screws compared with treatment with herbert screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1829–1837.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert TJ, Fisher WE. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Filan S, Herbert T. Herbert screw fixation of scaphoid fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:519–529.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Tian G. The length and position of the long axis of the scaphoid measured by analysis of three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography images. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011;36:98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DK. Anatomic features of the carpal scaphoid: validation of biometric measurements and symmetry with three-dimensional MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;187:187–191.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda S, Ishida O, Kido M, et al. A morphological study of the scaphoid using a mathematical technique and comparative study of the three-dimensional measurements of the scaphoid. Hand Surg. 2003;08:157–161.
   Google Scholar
• Ceri N, Korman E, Gunal I, et al. The morphological and morphometric features of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br Eur Vol. 2004;29:393–398.
   Google Scholar
• Rodt T, Ratiu P, Becker H, et al. 3 D visualisation of the middle ear and adjacent structures using reconstructed multi-slice CT datasets, correlating 3 D images and virtual endoscopy to the 2D cross-sectional images. Neuroradiology. 2002;44:783–790.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschmann M, Konala P, Amsler F, et al. The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:629–633.
   Google Scholar
• Minns R, Bibb R, Banks R, et al. The use of a reconstructed three-dimensional solid model from CT to aid the surgical management of a total knee arthroplasty: a case study. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:523–526.
   Google Scholar
• Citak M, Gardner MJ, Kendoff D, et al. Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:547–552.
   Google Scholar
• Suero EM, Hüfner T, Stübig T, et al. Use of a virtual 3D software for planning of tibial plateau fracture reconstruction. Injury. 2010;41:589–591.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan Z, Luo C, Feng D, et al. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in tibial plateau fractures with complex depressions. Technol Health Care. 2011;19:71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Wong K, Kumta S, Leung K, et al. Integration of CAD/CAM planning into computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2010;15:65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model. 2006;196:483–493.
   Google Scholar
• Luria S, Schwarcz Y, Wollstein R, et al. 3-dimensional analysis of scaphoid fracture angle morphology. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:508–514.
   Google Scholar
• Dias J, Wildin C, Bhowal B, et al. Should acute scaphoid fractures be fixed? A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2160–2168.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnars B, Pietreanu M, Bodestedt A, et al. Nonoperative compared with operative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1176–1185.
   Google Scholar
• Ring D, Patterson JD, Levitz S, et al. Both scanning plane and observer affect measurements of scaphoid deformity. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:696–701.
   Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy C, Cutler L, Nuttall D, et al. The factors affecting outcome after non-vascular bone grafting and internal fixation for nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:627–632.
   Google Scholar
• Eastley N, Singh H, Dias J, et al. Union rates after proximal scaphoid fractures; meta-analyses and review of available evidence. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38:888–897.
   Google Scholar
• Krimmer H. Management of acute fractures and non-unions of the proximal pole of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br Eur Vol. 2002;27:245–248.
   Google Scholar
• Trumble T, Nyland W. Scaphoid non-unions. Pitfalls and pearls. Hand Clin. 2001;17:611–624.
   Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Suh N, MacDermid JC. Use of computed tomography to predict union and time to union in acute scaphoid fractures treated nonoperatively. J Hand Surg. 2013;38:872–877.
   Google Scholar
• Murase T, Moritomo H, Goto A, et al. Does three-dimensional computer simulation improve results of scaphoid nonunion surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;434:143–150.
   Google Scholar