976
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Validation of the Finnish FACE-Q for use in patients undergoing surgery for functional problems or malignancy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 270-276 | Received 28 May 2021, Accepted 02 Aug 2021, Published online: 24 Aug 2021

References

  • Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott AM, et al. Measuring outcomes that matter to Face-Lift patients: development and validation of Face-Q appearance appraisal scales and adverse effects checklist for the lower face and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(1):21–30.
  • Lee EH, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Face-Q skin cancer module for measuring patient-reported outcomes following facial skin cancer surgery. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(1):88–94.
  • Kamran R, Longmire NM, Rae C, et al. Concepts important to patients with facial differences: a qualitative study informing a new module of the Face-Q for children and young adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;58(8):1020–1031.
  • Sharma K, Steele K, Birks M, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: an introduction and review of clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(3):247–252.
  • Santesso N, Barbara AM, Kamran R, et al. Conclusions from surveys may not consider important biases: a systematic survey of surveys. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;122:108–114.
  • Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Face-Q satisfaction with appearance scale: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for facial aesthetics patients. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):249–260.
  • Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Alderman A, et al. Self-report scales to measure expectations and appearance-related psychosocial distress in patients seeking cosmetic treatments. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(9):1068–1078.
  • Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Schwitzer JA, et al. Face-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(2):375–386.
  • Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Schwitzer JA, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the Face-Q skin, lips, and facial rhytids appearance scales and adverse effects checklists for cosmetic procedures. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(4):443–451.
  • Elegbede A, Mermulla S, Diaconu SC, et al. Patient-Reported outcomes in facial reconstruction: assessment of Face-Q scales and predictors of satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(12):e2004.
  • Su Y-Y, Denadai R, Ho C-T, et al. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in orthognathic surgery: linguistic and psychometric validation of the mandarin Chinese version of Face-Q instrument. Biomed J. 2020;43(1):62–73.
  • Homsy SP, Uimonen MM, Lindford AJ, et al. Application of the Face-Q rhinoplasty module in a mixed reconstructive and corrective rhinoplasty population in Finland. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2021:1–7. doi:10.1080/2000656X.2021.1898973
  • Klassen AF, Rae C, Gallo L, et al. Psychometric validation of the Face-Q craniofacial module for facial nerve paralysis. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021. doi:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0575
  • Homsy SP, Uimonen MM, Lindford AJ, et al. Finnish translation and validation of the Face-Q eye module. Scand J Surg. 2020:1457496920982767. doi:10.1177/1457496920982767
  • Association WM. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama. 2013;310:2191–2194.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (pro) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
  • Mokkink LP, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, et al. Cosmin Study Design Checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf
  • Sintonen H. The 15d instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):328–336.
  • Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
  • Revelle W. Psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University; 2018. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion=1.8.12.
  • Stoffel MA, Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. Rptr: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8(11):1639–1644.
  • LoMartire R. Rel: reliability coefficients. R Package Version 1.4.2. 2020. https://rdrr.io/cran/rel/
  • Bernaards CA, Jennrich RI. Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educ Psych Meas. 2005;65(5):676–696.
  • Rizopoulos D. Ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response analysis. J Stat Soft. 2006;17:25.
  • Wickham H. Tidyverse: easily install and load the 'Tidyverse'. R Package Version 1.2.1. 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tidyverse/index.html
  • Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):166–175.
  • Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Pusic AL. Face-Q satisfaction with appearance scores from close to 1000 facial aesthetic patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):651e–652e.
  • http://Qportfolio.Org/. [cited 2020 Jul 15].