596
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effect of demographic characteristics, Country of birth and country of medical training on the peer evaluations of internal medicine resident physicians

, &
Pages 92-97 | Received 04 Dec 2018, Accepted 14 Feb 2019, Published online: 12 Apr 2019

References

  • Basehore PM, Pomerantz SC, Gentile M. Reliability and benefits of medical student peers in rating complex clinical skills. Med Teach. 2014 May;36(5):409–414. PubMed PMID: 24597711
  • Beckman TJ, Lee MC, Mandrekar JN. A comparison of clinical teaching evaluations by resident and peer physicians. Med Teach. 2004 Jun;26(4):321–325. PubMed PMID: 15203844
  • Bentley BS, Hill RV. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;2(4):143–149. PubMed PMID: 19637291
  • Burgess A, Clark T, Chapman R, et al. Senior medical students as peer examiners in an OSCE. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):58–62. PubMed PMID: 23102164
  • Kovach RA, Resch DS, Verhulst SJ. Peer assessment of professionalism: a five-year experience in medical clerkship. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):742–746. PubMed PMID: 19390903; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2686767
  • Levine RE, Kelly PA, Karakoc T, et al. Peer evaluation in a clinical clerkship: students’ attitudes, experiences, and correlations with traditional assessments. Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Jan–Feb;31(1):19–24. PubMed PMID: 17242048.
  • Spandorfer J, Puklus T, Rose V, et al. Peer assessment among first-year medical students in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Mar–Apr;7(2):144–152. PubMed PMID: 23959790.
  • Speyer R, Pilz W, Van Der Kruis J, et al. Reliability and validity of student peer assessment in medical education: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2011;33(11):e572–e585. PubMed PMID: 22022910
  • Rand VE, Hudes ES, Browner WS, et al. Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American board of internal medicine evaluation scores. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Oct;13(10):670–674. PubMed PMID: 9798813; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1500895
  • Kaatz A, Lee YG, Potvien A, et al. Analysis of National Institutes of health R01 application critiques, impact, and criteria scores: does the sex of the principal investigator make a difference? Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1080–1088. PubMed PMID: 27276003; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4965296.
  • van der Lee R, Ellemers N. Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12349–12353. PubMed PMID: 26392544; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4603485.
  • de Oliveira GS Jr., Akikwala T, Kendall MC, et al. Factors affecting admission to anesthesiology residency in the United States: choosing the future of our specialty. Anesthesiology. 2012 Aug;117(2):243–251. PubMed PMID: 22739761.
  • Harris M, Macinko J, Jimenez G, et al. Does a research article’s country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers. BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 30;5(12):e008993. PubMed PMID: 26719313; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4710821.
  • Harris M, Macinko J, Jimenez G, et al. Measuring the bias against low-income country research: an implicit association test. Global Health. 2017 Nov 6;13(1):80. PubMed PMID: 29110668; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5674740
  • FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. PubMed PMID: 28249596; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5333436.
  • Annual Report on Residents: American Association of Medical Colleges. 2017. [cited 2018 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data/448474/residentsreport.html
  • United Nations Statistical Division: Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use. 2018. [cited 2018 Apr 26]. Available from: https;//unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49
  • United States Census Bureau 1997 Office of Management and Budget Standards 1997. Available from: https;//www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html