http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7939-7204
References
- HTAi. HTA Glossary. [ cited 2017 Mar 16]. Available from: http://htaglossary.net/health+technology+assessment+%28HTA%292016
- AOTMiT. Guidelines for conducting Health Technology Assessment. 2007. [ cited 2017 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.aotm.gov.pl/www/wp-content/uploads/wytyczne_hta/2007/Wytyczne_HTA_w_AOTM_03_2007.pdf
- AOTMiT. Guidelines for conducting Health Technology Assessment. 2009. [ cited 2017 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.aotm.gov.pl/www/wp-content/uploads/wytyczne_hta/2009/Wytyczne_HTA_pl_MS_29052009.pdf
- AOTMiT. Guidelines for conducting Health Technology Assessment. 2016. [ cited 2017 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.aotm.gov.pl/www/wp-content/uploads/wytyczne_hta/2016/20161104_HTA_Guidelines_AOTMiT.pdf
- The Act of 12 May 2011 on the Reimbursement of Medicines, Foodstuffs Intended for Particular Nutritional Uses and Medical Devices. Warsaw, Poland: Minister of Health; 2011.
- Gulácsi L, Rotar AM, Niewada M, et al. Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;1.
- Nizankowski R, Wilk N. From idealistic rookies to a regional leader: the history of health technology assessment in Poland. Int J RTechnol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:156–162.
- Wilsdon T, Fiz E, Haderi A. A comparative analysis of the role and impact of Health Technology Assessment: 2013 Final report. (Charles River Associates for PhRMA and EFPIA). London, UK: Charles River Associates; 2013.
- NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. 2013. [ cited 2017 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/resources/guide-to-the-methods-of-technology-appraisal-2013-pdf-2007975843781
- NICE. Single technology appraisal: user guide for company evidence submission template. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015. [ cited 2017 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg24/resources/single-technology-appraisal-user-guide-for-company-evidence-submission-template-pdf-72286715419333
- AOTMiT. Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej 2015. [ cited 2017 Mar 16]. Available from: http://bipold.aotm.gov.pl/index.php/zlecenia-mz- 192015
- Cochrane. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 Higgins JPT GS, editor. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available from: www.handbook.cochrane.org
- CRD. Systematic Reviews CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York; 2008.
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–8.
- EUnetHTA. Endpoints used for Relative Effectiveness Assessment Clinical Endpoints. Amended JA1 Guideline Final Nov 2015. EUnetHTA website: Diemen, The Netherlands; 2015.
- Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354(9193): 1896–1900.
- Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1013–1020.
- NICE. Quality assessment for Case series 2003. [ cited 2017 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg3/resources/appendix-4-quality-of-case-series-form2
- Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.
- EUnetHTA. EUnetHTA Joint Action 1 2010–2012. [ cited 2017 Mar 17]. Available from: http://eunethta.eu/activities/eunethta-joint-action-2010-12/eunethta-joint-action-2010-12
- EUnetHTA. EUnetHTA Joint Action 2 2012–2015. [ cited 2017 Mar 17]. Available from: http://eunethta.eu/activities/EUnetHTA%20Joint%20Action%202%20%282012-15%29/eunethta-joint-action-2-2012-2015
- EUnetHTA. EUnetHTA Joint Action 3 2016–2020. [ cited 2017 Mar 17]. Available from: http://eunethta.eu/activities/joint-action-3/jointaction31/eunethta-joint-action-3-2016-2020
- EUnetHTA. HTA Core Model Version 3.0 for the full assessment of Diagnostic Technologies, Medical and Surgical Interventions. Pharmaceutcals and Screening Technologies. Diemen, The Netherlands: EUnetHTA; 2016.
- Cook DJ, Sacket DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(1):167–171.
- Kawalec P, Malinowski KP. Relating Health Technology Assessment recommendations and reimbursement decisions in Poland in years 2012-2014, a retrospective analysis. Health Pol. 2016;120:1240–1248.
- Kolasa K, Wasiak R. Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions. Int J RTechnol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(1):70–76.
- Mathes T, Jacobs E, Morfeld JC, et al. Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations- a comparative analysis. BMC Health Serv Research. 2013;13:371.