Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy Volume 11, 2023 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
2,012
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Rapid literature review: definition and methodology

Beata Smelaa Assignity, Cracow, PolandCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-9083
ORCID Icon,
Mondher Toumib Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
,
Karolina Świerka Assignity, Cracow, Poland
,
Clement Francoisb Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
,
Małgorzata Biernikiewiczc Studio Slowa, Wroclaw, Poland
,
Emilie Clayb Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France;d Clever-Access, Paris, France
&
Laurent Boyerb Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
 show all
Article: 2241234 | Published online: 28 Jul 2023

References

  • Higgins JT, Chandler J, Cumpston M, et al. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 updated February 2022. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2022 [cited 2011 March]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbooks.
  • van der Knaap LM, Leeuw FL, Bogaerts S, et al. Combining campbell standards and the realist evaluation approach: the best of two worlds? Am J Eval. 2008;29(1):48–7. doi: 10.1177/1098214007313024
  • Swingler GH, Volmink J, Ioannidis JP. Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7423):1083–1084. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1083
  • Gordon M, Grafton-Clarke C, Hill E, et al. Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(11):1232–1238. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1513642
  • Rapid Reviews to Strengthen Health Policy and Systems: A Practical Guide. World Health Organization (WHO). 2017 https://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/publications/rapid-review-guide/en/.
  • Garritty C, Stevens A, Gartlehner G, et al. Cochrane rapid reviews methods group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0360-z
  • Dobbins M Rapid review Guidebook: Steps for conducting a rapid review. National collaborating centre for methods and tools. (NCCMT): McMaster University, Canada; 2017 https://www.nccmt.ca/capacity-development/rapid-review-guidebook
  • Collins A, Coughlin D, Miller J, et al. The production of quick scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments: A how to guide. UK Government. 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-production-of-quick-scoping-reviews-and-rapidevidence-assessments
  • Plüddemann A, Aronson JK, Onakpoya I, et al. Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(6):201. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110990
  • Wilson MG, Oliver S, Melendez-Torres GJ, et al. Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y
  • Garritty C, Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, et al. Cochrane rapid reviews methods group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2021;130:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007
  • Pandor A, Kaltenthaler E, Martyn-St James M, et al. Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing approaches for rapid reviews (STARR). J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;114:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.005
  • Tricco AC, Zarin W, Antony J, et al. An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.012
  • Haby MM, Chapman E, Clark R, et al. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0155-7
  • Tricco AC, Khalil H, Holly C, et al. Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20(4):944–949. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00371
  • Skeat J, Roddam H. The qual-CAT: Applying a rapid review approach to qualitative research to support clinical decision-making in speech-language pathology practice. Evid-Based Commun Assess Interv. 2019;13(1–2):3–14. doi: 10.1080/17489539.2019.1600292
  • Patnode CD, Eder ML, Walsh ES, et al. The use of rapid review methods for the U.S. preventive services task force. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(1s1):S19–s25. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.024
  • Kaltenthaler E, Cooper K, Pandor A, et al. The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0216-1
  • Marshall IJ, Marshall R, Wallace BC, et al. Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;109:30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.015

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.