Like school and not like school: ambivalences in Swedish preschool teachers’ enacted policy

References

• Ackesjö, H., & Persson, S. (2016). The educational positioning of the preschool-class at the border between social education and academic demands: An issue of continuity in Swedish early education? Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(1), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v5n1a19
   Google Scholar
• Alatalo, T., Meier, J., & Frank, E. (2016). Transition between preschool and preschool class: A question about interweaving care and knowledge. Early Childhood Educational Journal, 44(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0700-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnervik, K. (2013). “Yes, that’s also a way of thinking about it!” Pedagogical documentation as a tool for transformation in preschool. School of Education and Communication Jönköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Alvestad, M., & Berge, A. (2009). Svenske førskolelærere om læring i planlegging og praksis relatert til den nasjonale læreplanen [Swedish Preschool Teachers on Planning and Praxis in Relation to the National Syllabus]. Tidsskrift for Nordisk barnehageforskning, 2(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.7577/nbf.346.
   Google Scholar
• Areljung, S. (2018). Why do teachers adopt or resist a pedagogical idea for teaching science in preschool? International Journal of Early Years Education. E-publication ahead of print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areljung, S., & Kelly-Ware, J. (2017). Navigating the risky terrain of children’s working theories. Early Years, 37(4), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1191441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areljung, S., Ottander, C., & Due, K. (2017). “Drawing the leaves anyway”: Teachers embracing children’s different ways of knowing in preschool science practice. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1173–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9557-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åsén, G., Roth, V., & Ann-Christine. (2012). Utvärdering i förskolan: En forskningsöversikt. [Evaluation in preschool: Research review]. Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy. Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, J. (2005). Curriculum issues in national policy-making. European Early Childhood Research Journal, 13(2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930585209641
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum for the preschool. Lpfö. (1998). (revised 2010). Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum for the preschool. Lpfö. (2018). Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Z., & Luke, A. (2008). Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. In F. Michael Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), p. 66–88. SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Due, K., Tellgren, B., Areljung, S., Ottander, C., & Sundberg, B. (2018). Inte som i skolan – Pedagoger positionerar naturvetenskap I förskolan [Not like in school – Pedagogues position science in the preschool.]. NorDiNa, 14(4), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.4106
   Google Scholar
• Enö, M. (2005). Att våga flyga. Ett deltagarorienterat projekt om samtalets potential och förskolepersonals konstruktion av det professionella subjektet [Daring to fly. A participatory oriented project about the potential of conversation and preschool teacher’s construction of the professional subject]. Malmö studies in educational sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Folke-Fichtelius, M. (2008). Förskolans formande: Statlig reglering 1944-2008 [The formation of the preschool. State regulation 1944-2008]. Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Granbom, I. (2011). We have become almost too good”; Teachers’ social representations of pre-school as a pedagogical practice [Dissertation]. School of Education and Communication Jönköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, JL. (2008) ‘That's not treating you as a professional’: teachers constructing complex professional identities through talk, Teachers and Teaching, 14:2, 79–93, DOI: 10.1080/13540600801965861
   Google Scholar
• Kaga, Y. (2017). The relationship between early childhood and primary education in france and Sweden: A policy focus. In L. Miller, C. Cameron, C. Dalli, & N. Barbour (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of early childhood policy (pp. 87–107). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lago, L., Ackesjö, H., & Persson, V. (2018). Erkännandets dynamik – Förskoleklasslärares tolkningar av ny läroplanstext. [The dynamics of recognition – Preschool class teachers’ interpretations of new curriculum]. Educare, 2018(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2018.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Liljestrand, J. (2020). Förskollärares professionella undervisningskunskap [Preschool teachers’ professional teaching knowledge. In I. K. Bäckman, A. Elm, O. Lena, & M. Förskola (Eds.), barn och lärande – Didaktik i förskolan [Preschool, children and learning – Didactics in preschool. Liber, p. 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Liljestrand, J., & Hammarberg, A. (2017). The social construction of the competent, self-governed child in documentation: Panels in the Swedish preschool. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117692270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfdahl, A., & Pérez, H. (2009). Between control and resistance: Planning and evaluation texts in the Swedish preschool. Journal of Education Policy, 24(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930902759548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. (2015). ‘Where you stand depends on where you sit’: The social construction of policy enactments in the (English) secondary school. Discourse, 36(4), 485–499. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.977022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L., Cameron, C., Dalli, C., & Barbour, N. (2017). Introduction: Exploring the landscape of early childhood policy. In L. Miller, C. Cameron, C. Dalli, & N. Barbour (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of early childhood policy (pp. 1–15). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Otterstad, A. M., & Braathe, H. J. (2016). Travelling inscriptions of neo-liberalism in Nordic early childhood: Repositioning professionals for teaching and learnability. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610615627927
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T., & Lindblad, S. (2000). Educational goverance and social inclusion and exclusion: Some conceptual difficulties and problematics in policy and research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 5–44. doi:10.1080/01596300050005484.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S., Williams, P., Sandberg, A., Vuorinen, & Vourinen, T. (2011). Preschool teaching in Sweden – A profession in change. Educational Research, 53(4), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2011.625153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, B., Areljung, S., Due, K., Ekström, K., Ottander, C., & Tellgren, B. (2016). Understanding preschool emergent science in a cultural historical context through Activity Theory. European Early Childhood Research Journal, 24(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.978557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörner, A. (2016). ”Vi kan inte bara utgå från barnens intresse”. Pedagogers guidning av barns intresse i förhållande till förskolans målstyrning [“We cannot only base it on the children’s interests” - Educators guidance of children’s interests in relation to goals and guidelines]. Högskolan i Borås.
   Google Scholar