Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments

References

• Amcoff, J. (2016). The geographical redistribution of retail outlets in Sweden 1998–2008. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 26(3), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2016.1147477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, Å. E. (1985). Creativity and regional development. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 56(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887900
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Å. E. (1988a). Universitet: Regioners framtid. Regionplanekontoret.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Å. E., & Strömquist, U. (1988b). K-samhällets framtid. Prisma.
   Google Scholar
• Annerby Jansson, A., Hallén, I., & Larsson, B. (2008). Lund: Uniting the contemporary university with the cultural heritage and identity of a thousand years old city. In B. Larsson (Ed.), Univer-City. Sekel bokförlag, 40-58.
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., & Fedeli, V. (2014). The university and the city: Changing and challenging geographies in the Milan urban region. disP the Planning Review, 50(2), 8–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2014.945297
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, R. (2003). Testing the ‘Popsicle Test’: Realities of retail shopping in new ‘traditional neighbourhood developments’. Urban Studies, 40(8), 1471–1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000094397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, C. H., Syed, S., & Mount, J. (2007). The make up of institutional branding: Who, what, how? Tertiary Education and Management, 13(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880701502133
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Charles, D., & Madanipour, A. (2010). Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European Planning Studies, 18(10), 1611–1629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.504345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereitschaft, B. (2014). Neighbourhood change among creative-cultural districts in mid-sized US metropolitan areas, 2000–10. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.952770
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. P. (2012). Creating the market university. Princeton university press.
   Google Scholar
• Boontharm, D. (2015). Creative milieu of fashion and reuse in Tokyo, Bangkok and Singapore. Journal of Urban Design, 20(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.972347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, T. (2020). What do we know about university contribution to regional economic development? A conceptual framework. International Regional Science Review ( online first), 016001762090953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620909538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, R., & Kent, R. B. (2006). Integrating beyond the campus: Ohio’s urban public universities and neighbourhood revitalisation. Planning, Practice & Research, 21(1), 45–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450600901517
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2015). Home from home? Locational choices of international “creative class” workers. European Planning Studies, 23(12), 2336–2355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.988012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bygningsstyrelsen. (2013). Campusudvikling – Metode og process.
   Google Scholar
• Bylund, S.-Å., Franzén, M., & Nilsson, K. L. (2008). Uppsala as a university city. In B. Larsson (Ed.), Univer-City. Sekel bokförlag, 89-100.
   Google Scholar
• Caldenby, C. (1994). Universitetet och staden. White Coordinator Påbygget.
   Google Scholar
• Caldenby, C. (2008). The university–city interface. In B. Larsson (Ed.), Univer-City. Sekel bokförlag, 33-38.
   Google Scholar
• Campos Calvo-Sotelo, P. (2001). The architecture of higher education: University spatial models at the start of the twenty-first century. Higher Education Policy, 14(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00009-5
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, G. A., Chatterjee, S., & Hunt, R. M. (2007). Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, D. (2011). The role of universities in building knowledge cities in Australia. Built Environment, 37(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.37.3.281
   Google Scholar
• Chulvi, V., Agost, M. J., Felip, F., & Gual, J. (2020). Natural elements in the designer’s work environment influence the creativity of their results. Journal of Building Engineering, 28, 101033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evolution of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P., & Lopes, R. (2015). Urban design, public space and the dynamics of creative milieux: A photographic approach to Bairro Alto (Lisbon), Gràcia (Barcelona) and Vila Madalena (São Paulo). Journal of Urban Design, 20(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.991382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, J., Roberts, P., & Taylor, I. (2015). University trends: Contemporary campus design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, B., & Gustafsson, G. (2016). Stadsdelen Kronoparken I Karlstad: Samhällsplaneringens vedermödor. Karlstads Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Dalman, E., & Larsson, B. (2008). Malmö: A city in transformation from industrial to knowledge city. In B. Larsson (Ed.), Univer-City. Sekel bokförlag, 74-88.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, D. S., Curto, J. D., & Pinto, J. C. (2011). The impact of anchor stores on the performance of shopping centres: The case of Sonae Sierra. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 39(6), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551111137994
   Google Scholar
• Ehlenz, M. M. (2016). Neighborhood revitalization and the anchor institution: Assessing the impact of the University of Pennsylvania’s West Philadelphia initiatives on University City. Urban Affairs Review, 52(5), 714–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415601220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: Integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florax, R. (1992). The university: A regional booster? Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Göçer, Ö., Göçer, K., Başol, A. M., Kiraç, M. F., Özbil, A., Bakovic, M., Siddiqui, F. P., & Özcan, B. (2018). Introduction of a spatio-temporal mapping based POE method for outdoorspaces: Suburban university campus as a case study. In Building and environment (Vol. 145, pp. 125–139).
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (2013). The civic university. Connecting the global and the local. In R. Capello, A. Olechnicka, & G. Gorzelak (Eds.), Universities, cities and regions,  43-63. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., & Vallance, P. (2013). The university and the city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., Vallance, P., & Puukka, J. (2011). Experience of engagement between universities and cities: Drivers and barriers in three European cities. Built Environment, 37(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.37.3.299
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M., & Penn, A. (1997). Socio-spatial analysis of four university campuses; The implications of spatial configuration on creation and transmission of knowledge. Space Syntax First International Symposium, London.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. C. (1994). Open space preservation: An imperative for quality campus environments. Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1994.11774745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C., Currid-Halkett, E., Foster, N., & Murdoch III, J. (2014). The location patterns of artistic clusters: A metro- and neighborhood-level analysis. Urban Studies, 51(13), 2822–2843. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013516523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajrasouliha, A. H. (2017). Campus score: Measuring university campus qualities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajrasouliha, A. H., & Ewing, R. (2016). Campus does matter: The relationship of student retention and degree attainment to campus design. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 44(3), 1–16. https://www.scup.org/resource/campus-does-matter/.
   Google Scholar
• Hebbert, M. (2018). The campus and the city: A design revolution explained. Journal of Urban Design, 23(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1518710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heebels, B., & van Aalst, I. (2010). Creative clusters in Berlin: Entrepreneurship and the quality of place in Prenzlauer Berg and Kreutzberg. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 92(4), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2015). University choice: What do we know, what don’t we know and what do we still need to find out? International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2013-0150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, J. A., Gulwadi, G. B., Alves, S., & Sequeira, S. (2016). The relationship between perceived greenness and perceived restorativeness of university campuses and student-reported quality of life. Environment and Behavior, 48(10), 1292–1308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515598200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L. J., & Mercer, T. (2014). Nature in the learning environment: Exploring the relationship between nature, memory, and mood. Ecopsychology, 6(4), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2014.0034
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist Sten, K. (2008). Campus Sundsvall – Att bygga symbolvärden. Umeå Studies in History and Theory of Art XI.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J., & van Dalm, R. (2005). How to create a creative city? The viewpoints of Richard Florida and Jane Jacobs. Foresight, 7(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680510611796
   Google Scholar
• Hus, A. (2013). Method support for developing knowledge environments.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, T. (2006). Spatiality, built form, and creative industry development in the inner city. Environment and Planning A, 38(10), 1819–1841. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1992 [1961]). The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jansz, S. N., van Dijk, T., & Mobach, M. P. (2020). Critical success factors for campus interaction spaces and services – A systematic literature review. Journal of Facilities Management, 18(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-08-2019-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholod, M., Takai, K., & Yada, K. (2011). Clockwise and anti-clockwise directions of customer orientation in a supermarket: Evidence from RFID data. In A. König (Ed.), KES 2011, Part III (pp. 304–309). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2019). Creative actors and historical-cultural assets in urban regions. Regional Studies, 53(7), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1541077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkham, P. J. (2000). Institutions and urban form: The example of universities. Urban Morphology, 4(2), 63–77. http://urbanmorphology.org/online_unlimited/um200002_63-77.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, R. H. (1954). Attacks on the Ivory Tower. The Journal of Higher Education, 25(8), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1977827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, E. A., Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2017). Walkable art: An empirical investigation of arts-related business and walkable neighborhoods. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417690804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, A. L., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajucek, J. M. (2008). The relationship between student use of campus green spaces and perceptions of quality of life. HortTechnology, 18(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.18.2.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, A. L., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajucek, J. M. (2010). Graduate student use of campus green spaces and the impact on their perceptions of quality of life. HortTechnology, 20(1), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.20.1.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, M., & Hutton, T. (2015). Culture-led regeneration in the post-industrial built environment: Complements and contradictions in Victory Square, Vancouver. Journal of Urban Design, 20(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.974149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengi, O., Bilandzic, A., Foth, M., & Guaralda, M. (2020). Mapping Brisbane’s Casual Creative Corridor: Land use and policy implications of a new genre in urban creative ecosystems. Land Use Policy, 97, Article 104792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2015). Public space design of knowledge and innovation spaces: Learning from Kelvin Grove Urban Village, Brisbane. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 1(13), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0015-7
   Google Scholar
• Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2019). Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 146, 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, V., & Penker, M. (2016). Higher education institutions and regional development: A meta-analysis. International Regional Science Review, 39(2), 228–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017614531145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, D. C., & Wiewel, W. (ed). (2005). The university as urban developer. M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Plambech, T., & van den Bosch, C. C. K. (2015). The impact of nature on creativity – A study among Danish creative professionals. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powe, M., Mabry, J., Talen, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2016). Jane Jacobs and the value of older, smaller buildings. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1135072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, I., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L., & Agahi, H. (2003). The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities, 21(10), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770310493580
   Google Scholar
• Rantisi, N. M., & Leslie, D. (2010). Materiality and creative production: The case of the Mile End neighbourhood in Montréal. Environment and Planning A, 42(12), 2824–2841. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantisi, N. M., Leslie, D., & Christopherson, S. (2006). Guest editorial. Placing the creative economy: Scale, politics, and the material. Environment and Planning A, 38(10), 1789–1797. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeringskansliet. (2015). En nationell strategi för hållbar regional tillväxt och attraktionskraft 2015–2020. Summary in english: Short version of Sweden’s national strategy for sustainable regional growth and attractiveness 2015–2020.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, G. L. (2007). The impact of facilities on recruitment and retention of students. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(135), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.223
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., & Adams, N. (2008). Unlocking the potential: The role of universities in pursuing regeneration and promoting sustainable communities. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 23(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690940802408003
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, J. (2005). The 21st century urban university: New roles for practice and research. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, K. G., & Gulwadi, G. B. (2015). Recognizing campus landscapes as learning spaces. Journal of Learning Spaces, 4(1), 53–60. http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/972.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, K. G., & Gulwadi, G. B. (2018). College campus landscapes within a learning ecosystem. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 46(2), 50–64. https://www.scup.org/resource/college-campus-landscapes-within-a-learning-ecosystem/.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2012). Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities, 29(Suppl. 2), S9–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Skärbäck, E. (2013). Analysis of restorative outdoor characteristics on a university campus. NAEP Annual Conference, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Skärbäck, E., & Grahn, P. (2012). Grönska för kunskapande. SLU Landskap Trädgård Jordbruk Rapportserie, 2012, 9. https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/8785/.
   Google Scholar
• Skärbäck, E., Nyblom, J., Stoltz, J., & Grahn, P. (2014). Bra utemiljö i verksamhetsområden. Restorativa stimulerande kvaliteter på internationellt ledande campus. SLU Landskap Trädgård Jordbruk Rapportserie, 2014, 16. https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/11391/.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, A. J. (2011). The influence of district visual quality on location decisions of creative entrepreneurs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.567924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speake, J., Edmondson, S., & Nawaz, H. (2013). Everyday encounters with nature: Students’ perceptions and use of university campus green spaces. Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography, 7(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2013.71.21
   Google Scholar
• Statsbygg. (2018). Kunnskapsgrunnlag for universitets- og høgskolesektoren, rapport B.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Q. (2015). Creative milieux: How urban design nurtures creative clusters. Journal of Urban Design, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.981393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802489363.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2009). From space to place: University performance and its built environment. Higher Education Policy, 22(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.30
   Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2014). Space, place and university effectiveness’. In P. Temple (Ed.), The physical university. Contours of space and place in higher education (pp. 3–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tingsten, H. (1940). 1789–1940 En idéhistorisk återblick. Tiden, 32(9), 525–537.
   Google Scholar
• Universitets- og Bygningsstyrelsen. (2009). Campus and study environment. Physical framework for universities of the future.
   Google Scholar
• University Properties of Finland Ltd. (2015). How to co-create campus. SYK.
   Google Scholar
• Uršič, M., & Tamano, K. (2019). The importance of green amenities for small creative actors in Tokyo: Comparing natural and sociocultural spatial attraction characteristics. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 59(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.4710
   Google Scholar
• van den Heijer, A., de Vries, J., & de Jonge, H. (2012). Developing knowledge cities: Towards aligning urban and campus strategies. In M. van Geenhuizen & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Creative knowledge cities. Myths, visions and realities. Edward Elgar, 104-131.
   Google Scholar
• van Heur, B. (2010). The built environment of higher education and research: Architecture and the expectation of innovation. Geography Compass, 4(12), 1713–1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00408.x
   Google Scholar
• Veloutsou, C., Lewis, J. W., & Paton, R. A. (2004). University selection: Information requirements and importance. The International Journal of Educational Management, 18(3), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410527158
   Google Scholar
• Vidalakis, C., Sun, M., & Papa, A. (2013). The quality and value of higher education facilities: A comparative study. Facilities, 31(11/12), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-10-2011-0087
   Google Scholar
• Way, T. (2016). The urban university’s hybrid campus. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 11(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2016.1144673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiewel, W., & Perry, D. C. (2005). Ivory towers no more. Academic bricks and sticks. In D. C. Perry & W. Wiewel (Eds.), The university as urban developer (pp. 300–316). M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S., & Dovey, K. (2015). Creative multiplicities: Urban morphologies of creative clustering. Journal of Urban Design, 20(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.972346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaylali-Yildiz, B., Czerkauer-Yamu, C., & Çil, E. (2014). Exploring the effects of spatial and social segregation in university campuses: IZTECH as a case study. Urban Design International, 19(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2013.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar