Familiar strangers – managing engagements in public-private partnerships in education

References

• Andersen, N. Å. (2008). Partnerships: Machines of possibility. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antelo, A., & Henderson, R. L. (1992). Formulating effective school-corporation partnerships: A policy analysis model. School Organisation, 12(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260136920120106
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2007). Education plc. Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2018). Commericalising education: Profiting from reform! Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1467599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, R., & Højlund, H. (2015). Hurra, skolen brænder! Ildsjælen som professionsideal i den åbne skole. In H. Bjerg & N. Vaaben (Eds.), At lede efter læring: Ledelse og organiseringer i den reformerede skole (pp. 279–294). Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cardini, A. (2006). An analysis of the rhetoric and practice of educational partnerships in the UK: An arena of complexities, tensions and power. Journal of Education Policy, 21(14), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930600731773
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, M. H., & Vaaben, N. (2016). Grænseløse organisationer: Fra co-creation to co-stabilization. Social Kritik, 28(146), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening. (2020). https://www.da.dk/aabenvirksomhed/2020-02–12
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Hentschke, G. (2006). Public-private partnerships in education: Insights from the field. School Leadership & Management, 26(3), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430600736977
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2014). Den åbne skole.
   Google Scholar
• Derouet, J.-L., & Normand, R. (2011). Caesars and Rubicon: The hesitations of French policymakers in identifying a Third Way in education and training. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2011.560256
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, J. K. (2009). The role of social capital in sustaining partnership. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802642348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineer the Future. (2020). https://ekspert.engineerthefuture.dk/?_ga=2.175562658.1490390441.1581438811–1601652329.15814388112020–02–12
   Google Scholar
• EVA. (2018). Skolernes samarbejde med erhvervslivet.
   Google Scholar
• Evalueringsinstitut, D. (2013). Udfordringer og behov for viden. En kortlægning af centrale aktørers perspektiver på udfordringer i folkeskolen.
   Google Scholar
• Evalueringsinstitut, D. (2018). Åben skole – En kortlægning af skolernes samarbejde med omverdenen.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, H., & Davies, B. (2008). The impact of public private partnerships on education: A case study of Sewell Group Plc and Victoria Dock Primary School. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(1), 74–89.https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810844576
   Google Scholar
• Glatter, R. (2003). Collaboration, collaboration, collaboration. The origins and implications of a policy. Management in Education, 17(4), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206030170050601
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C. (2019). Løsninger i partnerskab. Gyldendal Public.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2017). Familiar stranger: A life between two islands. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugseth, J. F. (2014). Forenklingens verdiverden. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 55(4), 439–469. https://doi.org/10.18261/1504-291X-2014-04-03
   Google Scholar
• Hoff, D. L. (2002). School-business partnerships: It’s the schools’ turn to raise the grade! School Community Journal, 12(2), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., Enright, E., Stylianou, M., & McCuaig, L., et. al. (2018). Nuacing the critique of commercialisation in schools: Recognising teacher agency. Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1394500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højlund, H. (2014). Det værdibaserede partnerskab. Et dansk samarbejdsprojekt om lokal sundhedsfremme. Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift, 1(91. årgang), 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jagd, S. (2013). Criticism and the emergence of novelty in organizations [Paper presentation]. Fifth International Symposium on Process Organization Studies, Chania, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Bird, K. (2000). “Partnership” as strategy: Public-private relations in education action zones. British Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingsley, M., & Smith, R. J. (2010). Erhvervslivet skal forme folkeskolen. Information.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. (1995). Samtalen som interview. Tidsskriftet Antropologi, 31, 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Luhtakallio, E., & Thévenot, L. (2018). Politics of engagement in an age of differing voices. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1–2(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2018.1458432
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Partnerhip, conflict and gaming. Journal of Education Policy, 21(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930600600564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, R. (2017). Being ethnographic. A Guide to the theory and practice of ethnography. Sage, Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Mailhot, C., Gagnon, S., Langley, A., & Binette, L.-F. (2014). Distributing leadership across people and objects in a collaborative research projekt. Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, S. (2010). The individual in a social world: Essays and experiments. Pinter & Martin.
   Google Scholar
• Naturvidenskabernes Hus. (2020). https://www.nvhus.dk/tektanken/om-tektanken/2020-02–12
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the council on principles for public governance of public-private partnerships. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. (2017). Practices of boundary-work in the collaboration between principals and private sponsors in England’s academy schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1230785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrinos, H. A., Barrera-Osorio, F., & Guáqueta, J. (2009). The role and impact of public-private partnerships in education. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Pors, J. (2016). Den åbne skole og det autentiske mellemrum mellem skolen og virkeligheden. Social Kritik, 28(146), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pors, J. G., & Andersen, N. Å. (2015). Playful organisations: Undecidability as a scarce resource. Culture and Organization, 21(4), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.924936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. L., Mundy, K., Verger, A., & Menashy, F. (Eds). (2012). Public private partnerships in education. New actors and modes of governance in a globalizing world. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. (2013). The networked familiar stranger: An aspect of online and offline urban anonymity. In K. M. Cumiskey & L. Hjorth (Eds.), Mobile media practices, presence and politics: The challenge of being seamlessly mobile (pp. 135-150). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skarpenes, O. (2010). Justifications of educational reforms in norway (ca1965-1995). International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3), 640–665.
   Google Scholar
• Sløk, C., Carlsen, M. H., Christensen, J., Højlund, H., & Larsen, N. E. H. (2012). Fremtidens innovative folkeskole. Ledelse af innovation i folkeskolen. Center for Skoleledelse, CBS.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Wohlstetter, P. (2006). Understanding the different faces of partnering: A typology of public-private partnerships. School Leadership and Management, 26(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430600737090
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Hvor effektive og demokratiske er styringsnetværk? På jagt efter relevante evalueringskriterier og metastyringsteknikker. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016643181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (1998). “Courting business”: The rhetoric and practices of school-business partnerships. Journal of Education Policy, 13(3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093980130307
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). In-depth interviewing. In S. J. Taylor & R. Bogdan (Eds.), Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings (pp. 76–105). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56-73). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2006). L’action au pluriel: Sociologie des régimes d’engagement. Éditions la Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431007080703
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2011). Power and oppression from the perspective of the sociology of engagements: A comparison with Bourdieu’s and Dewey’s critical approaches to practical activitites. Irish Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.19.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2014). Voicing concern and difference: From public spaces to commonplaces. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.905749
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2015). Bounded justifiability: Making commonality on the basis of binding engagements. In P. Dumouchel & R. Gotoh (Eds.), Social bonds as freedom. Revisiting the dichotomy of the universal and the particular (pp. 82–108). Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2016). Stort resumé af l’action au pluriel. Sociologie des régimes d’engagement. Engagementsregimer. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2020). How does politics take closeness into account? Returns from Russia. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 33(2), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-9322-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undervisningsministeriet (2013). Lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen og forskellige andre love. LOV nr 1640 af 26/12/2013, §1 nr. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Undervisningsministeriet (2017). Lov om ændring af lov om Arbejdsgivernes Uddannelsesbidrag, lov om erhvervsuddannelser, lov om folkeskolen og forskellige andre love. LOV nr 706 af 08/06/2017. §3 nr 1.
   Google Scholar
• Vaaben, N. (2013). Innovations-, samarbejds- og styringsfantasmer i det offentlige. Roskilde Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, J. J., & Diezmann, C. M. (2013). Community partnerships for fostering student interest and engagement in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C., Armstrong, P., Bragg, J., & Pearson, D. (2013). Perfect partners or uneasy bedfellows ? Competing understandings of the place of business management within contemporary education partnerships. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 41(6), 751–766.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, G. J., & Woods, P. A. (2005). At the hard edge of change: Views from secondary head teachers on a public‐private partnership. Journal of Education Policy, 20(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000322810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, P. A., & Woods, G. J. (2004). Modernizing leadership through private participation: A marriage of inconvenience with public ethos? Journal of Education Policy, 19(6), 643–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000300445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar