Crossing Cultural Borders Through Ning

References

• Adams, M. (2007, Nov. 10). Surprise, Canadian pluralism is working. The Toronto Star, ID 01.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books/ Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2010). Adolescents online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, & popular culture. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bibby, R. (2004). Beyond the prosaic mosaic: Canadian inter-group attitudes, 1975–2000. In M. Zachariah, A. Sheppard & L. Barratt (Eds.), Canadian multiculturalism: Dreams, realities and expectations (pp. 224–240). Edmonton, Canada: CMEF.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R. W. (2007). Digital design: English language learners and reader reviews in online fiction. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Anew literacies sampler (pp. 115–136). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, J., Craig, W., Pepler, D., & Connolly, J. (2008). Adolescents online: The importance of Internet activity choices to salient relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(5), 522–536.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, D. (2009). Reading and writing video: media literacy and adolescents. In L. Christenbury (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp.287–303). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burn, A. (2008). The case of rebellion: Researching multimodal texts. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 151–178). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D.J. (Eds.), (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Desjarlais, M., & Willoughby, T. (2010). A longitudinal study of the relation between adolescent boys and girls’ computer use with friends and friendship quality: Support for the social compensation or the rich-get-richer hypothesis? Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 896– 905.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, M. J. (2004). The anatomy of an urban legend: Toronto’s multicultural reputation. Policy Matters, CERIS 11, October.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, C., & Gregg, M. (2010). My profile: The ethics of virtual ethnography. Emotion, Space and Society, 3(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Eamer, A. (2012). Making English our own: Ethnolects in Toronto’s diasporas. In A. Eamer (Ed.), Border terrains: World diasporas in the 21stcentury. Oxford, UK: Inter- disciplinary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Frideres, J. S. (2006). Cities and immigrant integration: The future of second- and third- tier centres. Our Diverse Cities, 2, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning: Social, teaching and cognitive presence. In C. Howard et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance and online learning (2nd ed., pp. 352–355). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, T. (1997). Bilingual life in a multilingual high school classroom: Teaching and learning in Cantonese and English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(2), 356–372.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler, B. S., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2013). Online intergroup contact. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net. Understanding our online behavior (2nd ed., pp. 220–252). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., & Eamer, A. (2012). How does the use of digital media benefit adolescent English language learners in the English classroom? In J. Kedrick, T. Dobson & C. Leggo (Eds.), English in middle and secondary classrooms: Creative and critical advice from Canadian teacher educators (pp. 57–62). Toronto, Canada: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., & Katz, M. (2006).Creating an agentive self: case studies of digital story telling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hutnik, N. (1986). Patterns of ethnic minority identification and modes of social adaptation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9(2), 150–167.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2008). The visual in learning and creativity: A review of the literature. London, UK: Arts Council England, Creative Partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Koyczan, S. (nd). We are more. You Tube. Canadian tourism commission. Retrieved Jan. 27, 2014 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsq68qRexFc
   Google Scholar
• Knox, C., (2011). Cohesion, sharing and integration in Northern Ireland, Government and Policy: Environment and Planning, 29(3), 548–566.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, L. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 337–340.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). A new literacies sampler. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226–246.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2012). International design collaboration and mentoring for tertiary students through Facebook. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 755–775.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (2001). English as a second language and English literacy development: The Ontario curriculum Grades 1–8. Toronto, Canada: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry (2013). Immigration and ethnocultural diversity in Canada: National household survey 2011. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, B. (1997). Identity and intonation: Linking dynamic processes in an ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 431–450.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social factors. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ng-A-Fook, N., Radford, L. & Ausman, T. (2012). Living a curriculum of hyph-e-nations: Diversity, equity, and social media. Multicultural Education Review, 4(2), 91–128.
   Google Scholar
• Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Olshtain, E., & Kotik, B. (2000). The development of bilingualism in an immigrant community. In E. Olshtain & G. Horenczyk (Eds.), Language, identity and immigration (pp. 201–217). Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University Magnes Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rambe, P. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in Facebook postings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 295–314.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism_self-amused.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, R.-C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829–845.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317–348.
   Google Scholar
• Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Toohey, K., Dagenais, D., & Schulze, E. (2012). Second language learners making video in three contexts. Language and Literacy, 14(2), 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
   Google Scholar