References
- AASA Bylaws, Beliefs and Position Statements. (n.d.). American association of school superintendents. aasa.org
- Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators and coalitions. St. Martin’s Press.
- Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
- Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2008). Finding identity: Theory and data.
- Carpenter, B. W., Bukoski, B. E., Berry, M., & Mitchell, A. (2015). Examining the social justice identity of assistant principals in persistently low-achieving schools. Urban Education, 52(3), 287–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915574529
- Caza, B. B., & Creary, S. J. (2016). The construction of professional identity. The Scholarly Commons. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books?id=KGNADwAAQBAJ
- Crow, G. M., & Scribner, S. P. (2013). Professional identities of urban school principals. In H. R. Milner & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 287–304). Routledge.
- Crow, G. M., Day, C., & Møller, J. (2017). Framing research on school principals’ identity. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 265–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1123299
- Crow, G. M., & Møller, J. (2017). Professional identities of school leaders across international contexts: An introduction and rationale1. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 749–758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217714485
- Cruz-Gonzalez, C., Rodriguez, C. L., & Segovia, J. D. (2020). A systematic review of principals’ leadership identity from 1993 to 2019. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896053
- Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 164(3), 139–182.
- Fass, P. (1991). Outside In: minorities and the transformation of American education. Oxford University Press.
- Fealy, G., Hegarty, J.-M., McNamara, M., Casey, M., O’Leary, D., Kennedy, C., O’Reilly, P., O’Connell, R., Brady, A.-M., & Nicholson, E. (2018). Discursive constructions of professional identity in policy and regulatory discourse. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(9), 2157–2166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13723
- Garcia-Martinez, I., & Tadeu, P. (2018). The influence of pedagogical leadership on the construction of professional identity: Systematic review. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(3), 145–162. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsser/issue/43625/534229
- Gee, J. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in educationse. (Second). L. Erlbaum Associates, 49–80.
- Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
- McKeon, K. A., Merchant, B., Flanagan-Gonzales, C., & Sultan, S. (2022). Thin places of resistance: A caring response to refugees in rural American schools. Educational Review, 1–23.
- Noguera, P. A. (2019). From the crisis of connection to the pursuit of our common humanity: The role of schools in responding to the needs of immigrant and refugee children. In Humanitarianism and mass migration: Confronting the world crisis, (pp. 291–307). University of California Press.
- Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. SAGE.
- Ravitch, S. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. SAGE.
- Souto-Manning, M. (2013). Critical for whom?: Theoretical and methodological dilemmas in critical approaches to language research (pp. 201-222). In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 201–222). SAGE.
- Tirado, F., & Galvez, A. (2007). Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), Art.31. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0702317
- van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
- Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
- Vasilyeva, A. L. (2015). Identity as a resource to shape mediation in dialogic interaction. Language and Dialogue, 5(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.3.01vas
- Vasilyeva, A. L. (2019). Language ideology and identity construction in public educational meetings. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 12(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2019.1575453