Benign violations in the suburban ensemble dramedy

References

• Abrams, M. H., and Geoffrey Harpham. 2009. A Glossary of Literary Terms. 11th ed. Stamford, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, Henri. 1914. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Translated by Cloudesley Brereton and Fred Rothwell. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Nancy A., Diana W. Guthrie, and Curtis G. Gaylord. 2009. “Therapeutic Humor in the Family: An Exploratory Study.” Humor 12 (2): 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Centerbar, David B., Simone Schnall, Gerald L. Clore, Erika D. Garvin, and Charles M. Judd. 2008. “Affective Incoherence: When Affective Concepts and Embodied Reactions Clash.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (4): 560–578. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coon, David R. 2014. Look Closer: Suburban Narratives and American Values in Film and Television. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeRochi, Jack. 2008. “What Have You Learned?’: Considering a New Hermeneutic of Satire in ‘Family Guy.” Studies in American Humor 3 (17): 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Pansy. 2017. “Joke Work: Comic Labor and the Aesthetics of the Awkward.” Comedy Studies 8 (1): 36–56. doi:10.1080/2040610X.2017.1279913.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, Sergei. 2010. Writings, 1934–1947: Sergei Eisenstein Selected Works. Vol. 3. London: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Everts, Elisa. 2006. “Identifying a Particular Family Humor Style: A Sociolinguistic Discourse Analysis.” Humor 16 (4): 369–412.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, Léon 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, MA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund. 1916. Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious. Translated by A. A. Brill. New York: Moffat, Yard and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Northrop. 1965. A Natural Perspective: The Development of Shakespearean Comedy and Romance. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgie, Rebecca. 2014. “Kynical Dogs and Cynical Masters: Contemporary Satire, Politics and Truth-Telling.” Humor 27 (2): 183–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschorn, Michael. 2007. “Quirked Around: The Unbearable Lightness of Ira Glass, Wes Anderson, and Other Paragons of Indie Sensibility.” The Atlantic, September. Accessed 17 April 2019. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/09/quirked-around/306119
   Google Scholar
• Hughey, Matthew W., and Sahara Muradi. 2009. “Laughing Matters: Economies of Hyper-Irony and Manic-Satire in South Park&Family Guy.” Humanity & Society 33 (3): 206–237.
   Google Scholar
• King, Geoff. 2014. Indie 2.0: Change and Continuity in Contemporary American Indie Film. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Kozloff, Sarah. 2000. Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkley: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latta, Robert L. 1998. The Basic Humor Process: A Cognitive-Shift Theory and the Case against Incongruity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Loukides, Paul. 1991. “The Celebration of Family Plot: Episodes and Affirmations.” In Beyond the Stars: Plot Conventions in American Popular Film, edited by Paul Loukides and Linda K. Fuller, 91–99. Bowling Green, KY: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, James. 2010. “Notes on Quirky.” Movie: A Journal of Film Criticism 1: 1–16. Accessed 17 April 2019. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/film/movie/contents/notes_on_quirky.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, Peter, and Joel Warner. 2014. The Humor Code. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, Peter, and Caleb Warren. 2010. “Benign Violations: Making Immoral Behavior Funny.” Psychological Science 21 (8): 1141–1149. doi:10.1177/0956797610376073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Judson, and Eddie Harmon-Jones, eds. 1999. Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Wellington, Wyatt. 2018. “Abject Humanism in Tom Perrotta Adaptations: Election and Little Children.” Sydney Studies in English 43: 88–107. Accessed 17 April 2019. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/SSE/article/view/12638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, Sianne. 2012. Our Aesthetic Categories: Zany, Cute, Interesting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, La Chrystal D. 2012. “Funny or Harmful?: Derogatory Speech on Fox’s Family Guy.” Communication Studies 63 (2): 119–135. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.638412.
   Google Scholar
• Sconce, Jeffrey. 2002. “Irony, Nihilism and the New American ‘Smart’ Film.” Screen 43 (4): 349–369. doi:10.1093/screen/43.4.349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Ed S. H., and Nico H. Frijda. 1999. “Sentiment in Film Viewing.” In Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, edited by Carl R. Plantinga and Greg M. Smith, 48–64. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Deborah J. 2012. “Framing the ‘Melancomic’: Character, Aesthetics and Affect in Wes Anderson’s Rushmore.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 10 (1): 97–117. doi:10.1080/17400309.2011.633785.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, George E. 1992. Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicans and Researchers. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, Barbara, Frank A. Rodden, Wolfgang Grodd, and Willibald Ruch. 2003. “Neural Correlates of Laughter and Humour.” Brain : A Journal of Neurology 126 (Pt 10): 2121–1238. doi:10.1093/brain/awg226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar