Learning from mistakes: can the Global Financial Crisis translate into social progress?

References

• Adler, N. M., and A.-W. Harzing 2009. “When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings”. Academy of Management Learning & Education 8 (1): 72–95. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Architzel, P. 2009. “Speaking out: Learning from Our Mistakes.” Futures Industry Magazine, March/April. Accessed October 30, 2009. www.futuresindustry.org/fi-magazine-home.asp?a=1310.
   Google Scholar
• Ardalan, K. 2000. “The Academic Field of Finance and Paradigm Diversity”. Southern Business Review 26 (1): 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ardalan, K. 2003. “Theories and Controversies in Finance: A Paradigmatic Overview”. International Journal of Social Economics 30 (1/2): 199–209. doi: 10.1108/03068290310453682
   Google Scholar
• Ballas, A., and V. Theoharakis 2003. “Exploring Diversity in Accounting Through Faculty Journal Perceptions”. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (4): 619–644. doi: 10.1506/MLWH-KBTM-ET47-LYKH
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann 1966. The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bérubé, G. 2009 (October 22). “Wall Street l'insolente.” Le Devoir.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and L. J. D. Wacquant 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. 2006. “The Bounds of Rationality: Power/History/Imagination”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 17 (7): 847–863. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2005.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., M. W. Dirsmith, J. B. Heian, and S. Samuel 1998. “The Calculated and the Avowed: Techniques of Discipline and Struggles Over Identity in Big Six Public Accounting Firms”. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (2): 293–327. doi: 10.2307/2393854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It can Succeed Again, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Histoire de la sexualité 1 – la volonté de savoir [The History of Sexuality, Volume I: an Introduction], Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “The Subject and Power”. In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by H. L. DreyfusP. Rabinow, 208–226, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y. 2008. “Constituting the Academic Performer: The Spectre of Superficiality and Stagnation in Academia”. European Accounting Review 17 (1): 97–127. doi: 10.1080/09638180701705973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., and L. F. Spira 2009. “What Went Wrong? The Downfall of Arthur Andersen and the Construction of Controllability Boundaries Surrounding Financial Auditing”. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (4): 987–1027. doi: 10.1506/car.26.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guénin-Paracini, H., and Y. Gendron 2010. “Auditors as Modern Pharmakoi: Legitimacy Paradoxes and the Production of Economic Order”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21 (2): 134–158. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2009.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. 1983. “On Trying to Study Accounting in the Contexts in Which it Operates”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 (2–3): 287–305. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(83)90035-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. 2009a. “Exploring the Interface Between Accounting and Finance”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (5): 549–550. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. 2009b. “Reflections and Projections – and Many, Many Thanks”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (8): 887–894. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., and P. Moizer 1990. “From Techniques to Ideologies: An Alternative Perspective on the Audit Function”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1 (3): 217–238. doi: 10.1016/1045-2354(90)03021-7
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., P. Moizer, and S. Turley 1992. “The Audit Expectations Gap – Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose?”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3 (2): 137–161. doi: 10.1016/1045-2354(92)90008-F
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, N. B. 2009. “‘Effective’ Genealogical History: Possibilities for Critical Accounting History Research”. Accounting Historians Journal 36 (1): 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., M.-S. Tremblay, and Y. Gendron 2012. “Sense-Making in Compensation Committees: A Cultural Theory Perspective”. Organization Studies 33 (3): 389–421. doi: 10.1177/0170840611433993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., and N. Rose 1990. “Governing Economic Life”. Economy and Society 19 (1): 1–31. doi: 10.1080/03085149000000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. A., P. E. Tetlock, L. Tanlu, and M. H. Bazerman 2006. “Conflicts of Interest and the Case of Auditor Independence: Moral Seduction and Strategic Issue Cycling”. Academy of Management Review 31 (1): 10–29. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.19379621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch, A. 2003. “Communities of Practice and Habitus: A Critique”. Organization Studies 24 (3): 383–401. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024003909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neu, D., E. Ocampo Gomez, C. Graham, and M. Heincke 2006. “‘Informing’ Technologies and the World Bank”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (7): 635–662. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (Eds.). 1984. “Introduction”. In The Foucault Reader, (pp. 3–29). New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2009. “No One is Perfect: The Limits of Transparency and an Ethic for ‘Intelligent’ Accountability”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (8): 957–970. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, K. 2012. “Financial Sector Compensation and Excess Risk-Taking – A Consideration of the Issues and Policy Lessons.” DESA working paper no. 115. Accessed June 13, 2013. www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2012/wp115_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sikka, P., and H. Willmott 1995. “The Power of ‘Independence’: Defending and Extending the Jurisdiction of Accounting in the United Kingdom”. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (6): 547–581. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(94)00027-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. 2004. “The Critical Period of Disasters: Insights from Sense-Making and Psychoanalytic Theory”. Human Relations 57 (10): 1243–1261. doi: 10.1177/0018726704048354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townley, B. 1994. Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, M.-S., and Y. Gendron 2011. “Governance Prescriptions Under Trial: On the Interplay Between the Logics of Resistance and Compliance in Audit Committees”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22 (3): 259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 2011. “Journal List Fetishism and the Perversion of Scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS List”. Organization 18 (4): 429–442. doi: 10.1177/1350508411403532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, A. R. 2004. “Accounting Professionalism – They Just Don't Get it!”. Accounting Horizons 18 (1): 45–53. doi: 10.2308/acch.2004.18.1.45
   Google Scholar