22
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methodology and Policy

The impact of ESG performance on corporate risk-taking: empirical evidence from China

&
Received 11 Dec 2023, Accepted 03 Jun 2024, Published online: 11 Jun 2024

References

  • Abebe, M.A. 2010. Top team composition and corporate turnaround under environmental stability and turbulence. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 31, no. 3: 196–212. doi:10.1108/01437731011039325.
  • Ayadi, M.A., M.I. Kusy, M. Pyo, and S. Trabelsi. 2015. Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, and managerial risk-taking. Paper Presented at 2015 Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA) Annual Conference. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2547576.
  • Banerjee, R., and K. Gupta. 2017. The effects of environmental sustainability and R&D on corporate risk-taking: International evidence. Energy Economics 65: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.016.
  • Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no. 6: 1173–1182.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
  • Baruah, L., and N.M. Panda. 2020. Measuring corporate reputation: A comprehensive model with enhanced objectivity. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 12, no. 2: 139–161. doi:10.1108/APJBA-10-2019-0215.
  • Belghitar, Y., and E. Clark. 2015. Managerial risk incentives and investment related agency costs. International Review of Financial Analysis 38: 191–197. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.012.
  • Boubakri, N., J.-C. Cosset, and W. Saffar. 2013. The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics 108, no. 3: 641–658. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007.
  • Brickley, J.A., R.C. Lease, and C.W. Smith. 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 267–291. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(88)90047-5.
  • Bushman, R.M., J.D. Piotroski, and A.J. Smith. 2004. What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research 42, no. 2: 207–252. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00136.x.
  • Cahan, S.F., C. Chen, L. Chen, and N.H. Nguyen. 2015. Corporate social responsibility and media coverage. Journal of Banking & Finance 59: 409–422. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.004.
  • Callen, J.L., and X. Fang. 2013. Institutional investor stability and crash risk: Monitoring versus short-termism? Journal of Banking & Finance 37, no. 8: 3047–3063. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.018.
  • Cao, D., and Y. Yu. 2023. Top management team stability and enterprise innovation: A chairman’s implicit human capital perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics 44, no. 4: 2346–2365. doi:10.1002/mde.3821.
  • Che-Yahya, N., R. Abdul-Rahim, and O. Yong. 2014. Influence of institutional investors’ participation on flipping activity of Malaysian IPOs. Economic Systems 38, no. 4: 470–486. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.03.002.
  • Chen, H.-L. 2011. Does board independence influence the top management team? Evidence from strategic decisions toward internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review 19, no. 4: 334–350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00850.x.
  • Chen, X., Q. Cheng, and X. Wang. 2015. Does increased board independence reduce earnings management? Evidence from recent regulatory reforms. Review of Accounting Studies 20, no. 2: 899–933. doi:10.1007/s11142-015-9316-0.
  • Chen, P., and A.A. Dagestani. 2023. Greenwashing behavior and firm value – From the perspective of board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30, no. 5: 2330–2343. doi:10.1002/csr.2488.
  • Cheng, L.T.W., R.Y.K. Chan, and T.Y. Leung. 2010. Management demography and corporate performance: Evidence from China. International Business Review 19, no. 3: 261–275. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.007.
  • Chu, S.N., and L. Song. 2015. Promoting private entrepreneurship for deepening market reform in China: A resource allocation perspective. China & World Economy 23, no. 1: 47–77. doi:10.1111/cwe.12099.
  • Clausen, T.H. 2009. Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 20, no. 4: 239–253. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004.
  • Clementino, E., and R. Perkins. 2021. How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics 171, no. 2: 379–397. doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4.
  • Coles, J., N. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2006. Managerial incentives and risk-taking⋆. Journal of Financial Economics 79, no. 2: 431–468. doi10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.004.
  • Conyon, M.J., and L. He. 2011. Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 17, no. 4: 1158–1175. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.006.
  • Crutchley, C.E., J.L. Garner, and B.B. Marshall. 2002. An examination of board stability and the long-term performance of initial public offerings. Financial Management 31, no. 3: 63. doi:10.2307/3666315.
  • Demirer, R., A.M. Kutan, and C.-D. Chen. 2010. Do investors herd in emerging stock markets?: Evidence from the Taiwanese market. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 76, no. 2: 283–295. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.06.013.
  • Díez-Esteban, J.M., J.B. Farinha, and C.D. García-Gómez. 2019. How does national culture affect corporate risk-taking? Eurasian Business Review 9, no. 1: 49–68. doi:10.1007/s40821-018-0105-0.
  • Diaye, M.-A., S.-H. Ho, and R. Oueghlissi. 2022. ESG performance and economic growth: A panel co-integration analysis. Empirica 49, no. 1: 99–122. doi:10.1007/s10663-021-09508-7.
  • Drempetic, S., C. Klein, and B. Zwergel. 2020. The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics 167, no. 2: 333–360. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1.
  • Dyck, A., K.V. Lins, L. Roth, and H.F. Wagner. 2019. Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 131, no. 3: 693–714. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013.
  • El Khoury, R., N. Nasrallah, and B. Alareeni. 2023. ESG and financial performance of banks in the MENAT region: Concavity–convexity patterns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 13, no. 1: 406–430. doi:10.1080/20430795.2021.1929807.
  • Elyasiani, E., J. Jia, and C.X. Mao. 2010. Institutional ownership stability and the cost of debt. Journal of Financial Markets 13, no. 4: 475–500. doi:10.1016/j.finmar.2010.05.001.
  • Faccio, M., M.-T. Marchica, and R. Mura. 2011. Large shareholder diversification and corporate Risk-Taking. Review of Financial Studies 24, no. 11: 3601–3641. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr065.
  • Farag, H., and C. Mallin. 2018. The influence of CEO demographic characteristics on corporate risk-taking: Evidence from Chinese IPOs. The European Journal of Finance 24, no. 16: 1528–1551. doi:10.1080/1351847X.2016.1151454.
  • Firth, M., Wang, K., & Wong, S. M. (2015). Corporate transparency and the impact of investor sentiment on stock prices. Management Science, 61, 1630–1647. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1911
  • Francis, J.R., S. Huang, I.K. Khurana, and R. Pereira. 2009. Does corporate transparency contribute to efficient resource allocation? Journal of Accounting Research 47, no. 4: 943–989. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00340.x.
  • Guan, J., and R.C.M. Yam. 2015. Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy 44, no. 1: 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.001.
  • Guo, Z., and W. Jiang. 2020. Risk-taking for entrepreneurial new entry: Risk-taking dimensions and contingencies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 16, no. 2: 739–781. doi:10.1007/s11365-019-00567-8.
  • Habib, A., and M.M. Hasan. 2017. Firm life cycle, corporate risk-taking and investor sentiment. Accounting & Finance 57, no. 2: 465–497. doi:10.1111/acfi.12141.
  • Hao, Y., D. Han, C. Ning, and J. Liao. 2021. Culture from overseas and corporate transparency: Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics 26, no. 2: 2491–2516. doi:10.1002/ijfe.1917.
  • He, F., C. Ding, W. Yue, and G. Liu. 2023. ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis 87: 102550. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550.
  • He, L., and M. Jiang. 2022. CSR performance, executive compensation incentive and innovation investment of Chinese private enterprises under dynamic perspective. Scientific Programming 2022: e3980713. doi:10.1155/2022/3980713
  • Huang, J., Z. Duan, M. Hu, and Y. Li. 2022. More stable, more sustainable: Does TMT stability affect sustainable corporate social responsibility? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 58, no. 4: 921–938. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2020.1852926.
  • Huang, Y.S., and C.-J. Wang. 2015. Corporate governance and risk-taking of Chinese firms: The role of board size. International Review of Economics & Finance 37: 96–113. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.016.
  • Huang, G., F. Ye, Y. Li, L. Chen, and M. Zhang. 2023. Corporate social responsibility and bank credit loans: Exploring the moderating effect of the institutional environment in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 40, no. 2: 707–742. doi:10.1007/s10490-021-09800-x.
  • Ikeda, N., K. Inoue, and S. Watanabe. 2018. Enjoying the quiet life: Corporate decision-making by entrenched managers. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 47: 55–69. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2017.12.003.
  • Imhof, M.J., and S.E. Seavey. 2014. Corporate risk-taking, firm value and high levels of managerial earnings forecasts. Advances in Accounting 30, no. 2: 328–337. doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2014.09.004.
  • Jo, H., and Y. Kim. 2008. Ethics and Disclosure: A study of the financial performance of firms in the seasoned equity offerings market. Journal of Business Ethics 80, no. 4: 855–878. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9473-6.
  • John, K., L. Litov, and B. Yeung. 2008. Corporate governance and risk-taking. The Journal of Finance 63, no. 4: 1679–1728. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01372.x.
  • Jumreornvong, S., S. Treepongkaruna, P. Prommin, and P. Jiraporn. 2019. The effects of ownership concentration and corporate governance on corporate risk-taking. Accounting Research Journal 33, no. 1: 252–267. doi:10.1108/ARJ-09-2018-0144.
  • Kim, J.W., and C.K. Park. 2023. Can ESG Performance mitigate information asymmetry? Moderating effect of assurance services. Applied Economics 55, no. 26: 2993–3007. doi:10.1080/00036846.2022.2107991.
  • Kim, K., S. Patro, and R. Pereira. 2017. Option incentives, leverage, and risk-taking. Journal of Corporate Finance 43: 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.12.003.
  • Lang, M., and M. Maffett. 2011. Transparency and liquidity uncertainty in crisis periods. Journal of Accounting and Economics 52, no. 2–3: 101–125. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.07.001
  • Langenmayr, D., and R. Lester. 2018. Taxation and corporate risk-taking. The Accounting Review 93, no. 3: 237–266. doi:10.2308/accr-51872.
  • Li, K., D. Griffin, H. Yue, and L. Zhao. 2013. How does culture influence corporate risk-taking? Journal of Corporate Finance 23: 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.07.008.
  • Li, J., G. Lian, and A. Xu. 2023. How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study. Journal of Business Research 158: 113648. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113648.
  • Li, W., G. Rhee, and S.S. Wang. 2017. Differences in herding: Individual vs. institutional investors. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 45: 174–185. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.11.005.
  • Li, J., and Y. Tang. 2010. CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal 53, no. 1: 45–68. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48036912.
  • Lian, Y., T. Ye, Y. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2023. How does corporate ESG performance affect bond credit spreads: Empirical evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance 85: 352–371. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2023.01.024.
  • Liao, J., Y. Zhan, and Y. Yuan. 2024. Top management team stability and corporate default risk: The moderating effects of industry competition and strategic deviance. Managerial and Decision Economics 45, no. 2: 809–827. doi:10.1002/mde.4038.
  • Lin, K.J., X. Lu, J. Zhang, and Y. Zheng. 2020. State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research 13, no. 1: 31–55. doi:10.1016/j.cjar.2019.12.001.
  • Lin, W.T., S. Tsai, and P. Lung. 2013. Investors’ herd behavior: Rational or irrational? Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 42, no. 5: 755–776. doi:10.1111/ajfs.12030.
  • Lin, X., H. Zhu, and Y. Meng. 2023. ESG greenwashing and equity mispricing: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters 58: 104606. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104606.
  • Liu, D., K. Gu, and W. Hu. 2023. ESG performance and stock idiosyncratic volatility. Finance Research Letters 58: 104393. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104393.
  • Liu, G., H. Qian, Q. Wu, and F. Han. 2024. Research on the masking effect of vertical interlock on ESG greenwashing in the context of sustainable Enterprise development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 31, no. 1: 196–209. doi:10.1002/csr.2562.
  • Loukil, N., and O. Yousfi. 2016. Does gender diversity on corporate boards increase risk-taking? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de L'Administration 33, no. 1: 66–81. doi:10.1002/cjas.1326.
  • Lu, J., and H. Li. 2024. “The Impact of ESG Ratings on Low Carbon Investment: Evidence from Renewable Energy Companies.” Renewable Energy 223: 119984.
  • Mohammad, W.M.W., and S. Wasiuzzaman. 2021. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems 2: 100015. doi:10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015.
  • Setiarini, A., L. Gani, V. Diyanty, and D. Adhariani. 2023. Strategic orientation, risk-taking, corporate life cycle and environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Business Strategy & Development 6, no. 3: 491–502. doi:10.1002/bsd2.257.
  • Shabana, K.M., A.K. Buchholtz, and A.B. Carroll. 2017. The institutionalization of corporate social responsibility reporting. Business & Society 56, no. 8: 1107–1135. doi:10.1177/0007650316628177.
  • Siew, R.Y.J., M.C.A. Balatbat, and D.G. Carmichael. 2016. The impact of ESG disclosures and institutional ownership on market information asymmetry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 23, no. 4: 432–448. doi:10.1080/16081625.2016.1170100.
  • Strahilevitz, M.A., T. Odean, and B.M. Barber. 2011. Once burned, twice shy: How naive learning, counterfactuals, and regret affect the repurchase of stocks previously sold. Journal of Marketing Research 48, no. SPL: S102–S120. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S102.
  • Su, K., and H. Liu. 2021. Financialization of manufacturing companies and corporate innovation: Lessons from an emerging economy. Managerial and Decision Economics 42, no. 4: 863–875.doi:10.1002/mde.3278.
  • Tian, H., and G. Tian. 2022. Corporate sustainability and trade credit financing: Evidence from environmental, social, and governance ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29, no. 5: 1896–1908. doi:10.1002/csr.2335.
  • Tran, Q. T. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate risk-taking: International evidence. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 52–53, 100605. doi:10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.100605
  • Wang, C.-J. 2012. Board size and firm risk-taking. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 38, no. 4: 519–542. doi:10.1007/s11156-011-0241-4.
  • Wang, K., T. Li, Z. San, and H. Gao. 2023. How does corporate ESG performance affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 80: 102087. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102087.
  • Wang, J., and N. Mao. 2022. Does financialization of non-financial corporations promote or prohibit corporate risk-taking? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 58, no. 7: 1913–1924. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2021.1944853.
  • Wang, W., Y. Yu, and X. Li. 2022. ESG performance, auditing quality, and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology 13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948674.
  • Wen, F., C. Li, H. Sha, and L. Shao. 2021. How does economic policy uncertainty affect corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters 41: 101840. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2020.101840.
  • Wright, P., S.P. Ferris, A. Sarin, and V. Awasthi. 1996. Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking. Academy of Management Journal 39, no. 2: 441–458. doi:10.2307/256787.
  • Wright, P., M. Kroll, J.A. Krug, and M. Pettus. 2007. Influences of top management team incentives on firm risk taking. Strategic Management Journal 28, no. 1: 81–89. doi:10.1002/smj.548.
  • Wu, B., F. Chen, L. Li, L. Xu, Z. Liu, and Y. Wu. 2024. Institutional investor ESG activism and exploratory green innovation: Unpacking the heterogeneous responses of family firms across intergenerational contexts. The British Accounting Review 101324, doi:10.1016/j.bar.2024.101324.
  • Yao, W., H. Yang, X. Shi, and Z. Song. 2024. Top management team stability and debt concentration. International Review of Financial Analysis 91: 103029. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103029.
  • Yu, E.P., B.V. Luu, and C.H. Chen. 2020. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance 52: 101192. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192.
  • Zhang, J., and Y. Yang. 2023. Can environmental disclosure improve price efficiency? The perspective of price delay. Finance Research Letters 52: 103556. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2022.103556.
  • Zhou, Z., L. Liu, H. Zeng, and X. Chen. 2018. Does water disclosure cause a rise in corporate risk-taking?—Evidence from Chinese high water-risk industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 195: 1313–1325. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.001.
  • Zhu, N., Y. Zhou, S. Zhang, and J. Yan. 2023. Tax incentives and environmental, social, and governance performance: Empirical evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30, no. 19: 54899–54913. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-26112-3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.