A dialectical approach to understanding the relationship between science and spirituality: The MODI model

References

• Adler, F. 1905. The Essentials of Spirituality. New York: James Pott & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Altglas, V. 2014. From Yoga to Kabbalah: Religious Exoticism and the Logics of Bricolage. New York: Oxford University Press USA.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, K. 2004. “Fundamentalism and the Secular Society.” International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis 59: 875–877. doi: 10.1177/002070200405900410
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, I. 2000. When Science Meets Religion. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, P. J. 2009. “Depression and Attention to Two Kinds of Meaning: A Cognitive Perspective.” Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy 23: 248–262. doi: 10.1080/02668730903227123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belenky, M. F., B. M. Clinchy, B. M. Goldberger, and J. M. Tarule. 1988. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, B. G. 2006. “Despite Their Inevitable Conflicts – Science, Religion and New Age Spirituality are Essentially Compatible and Complementary Activities.” Medical Hypotheses 67: 433–436. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, P. 2018. Religion and Science: The Basics. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clinchy, B. M. 1996. “Connected and Separate Knowing; Toward a Marriage of two Minds.” In Knowledge, Difference, and Power; Essays Inspired by “Women’s Ways of Knowing”, edited by N. R. Goldberger, J. M. Tarule, B. M. Clinchy, and M. F. Belenky, 205–247. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, F., and V. F. Reyna. 2007. “Is the Teen Brain too Rational?” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-the-teen-brain-too-rational/.
   Google Scholar
• Foster Jones, R. 1961. Ancient and Moderns: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, R. C. 2001. Spiritual but not Religious: Understanding Unchurched America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galotti, K. M., B. M. Clinchy, K. H. Ainsworth, et al. 1999. “A New Way of Assessing Ways of Knowing: The Attitudes Toward Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS).” Sex Roles 40: 745–766. doi: 10.1023/A:1018860702422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galotti, K. M., M. J. Schneekloth, A. P. Smith, C. Bou Mansour, and A. L. Nixon. 2018. “Ways of Knowing and Appraisal of Intellectual Activities.” The American Journal of Psychology 131: 53–63. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.1.0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, R. S. 2012. Spirituality: What It Is and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. 1999. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, D. W. 1994. The Azoth Ritual. www.azothalchemy.org/azoth_ritual.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Heelas, P., and L. Woodhead. 2005. The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 1991. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. 1963. Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry Into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. 1995. Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York: Flamingo.
   Google Scholar
• McGilchrist, I. 2011. Can the Divided Brain Tell us Anything About the Ultimate Nature of Reality? London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Iain%20McGilchrist%20Can%20the%20divided%20brain%20tell%20us%20anything%20about%20the%20ultimate%20nature%20of%20reality.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McGilchrist, I. 2012. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercadante, L. A. 2014. Belief Without Borders: Inside the Minds of the Spiritual but not Religious. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, A. M. 2015. “Gender inequality in science.” Science 347: 234–235. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, B. F. 2006. The Head and the Heart: Philosophy in Literature. New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindra, R. 2001. Science and the Sacred. London: Theosophical Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., and F. Farley. 2006. “Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 (1): 1–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. 2018. Paths Between Head and Heart: Exploring the Harmonies of Science and Spirituality. London: O Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, J. 2000. “Dialectical Thinking and Humanistic Psychology.” Practical Philosophy. http://www.society-for-philosophy-in-practice.org/journal/pdf/3-2202020Rowan20-20Humanistic%20Psychology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rowson, J. 2014. Spiritualise: Revitalising Spirituality to Address 21st Century Challenges. London: RSA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. 2011. “The Intuitive Style: Relationships with Local/Global and Verbal/Visual Styles, Gender, and Superstitious Reasoning.” Learning and Individual Differences 21 (3): 263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2014. Is it better to be religious than spiritual? BBC Magazine. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-27554640.
   Google Scholar
• Tacey, D. 2004. The Spirituality Revolution: The Emergence of Contemporary Spirituality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, J. D., and P. J. Barnard. 1993. Affect, Cognition and Change: Re-Modelling Depressive Thought. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vaillant, G. 2008. Spiritual Evolution: A Scientific Defense of Faith. New York: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vradenburg, G. 2007. “Science and Spirituality Working Together.” Tikkun 22 (6): 8. doi: 10.1215/08879982-2007-6003
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, H., and K. H. Reich. 2005. “Reconnecting Science and Spirituality: Towards Overcoming a Taboo.” Zygon 40: 423–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber, K. 2000. The Marriage of Sense and Soul. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Xinyan, J. 2013. “Chinese Dialectical Thinking – The Yin Yang Model.” Philosophy Compass 8 (5): 438–446. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12035
   Google Scholar