REFERENCES
- Adelman, J. S., Marquis, S. J., & Sabatos-DeVito, M. G. (2010). Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science, 21, 1799–1801. doi:10.1177/0956797610387442
- Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177–178. doi:10.1038/226177a0
- Bouma, H. (1978). Visual search and reading: Eye movements and functional visual field: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 115–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Chanceaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2012). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision. Acta Psychologica, 141, 149–158. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.08.001
- Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hénaff, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291–307. doi:10.1093/brain/123.2.291
- Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 4–45.
- Dandurand, F., Grainger, J., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Granier, J.-P. (2011). On coding non-contiguous letter combinations. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:136. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00136
- Dehaene, S. (2005). Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In S. Dehaene, J. R. Duhamel, M. Hauser, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), From monkey brain to human brain (pp. 133–157). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 254–262. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003
- Ellis, A. W., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: A review of the evidence. Neuropsychologia, 48, 353–365. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.021
- Freeman, J., & Pelli, D. G. (2007). An escape from crowding. Journal of Vision, 7, 22. doi:10.1167/7.2.22
- Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35. doi:10.1080/01690960701578013
- Grainger, J., Tydgat, I., & Isselé, J. (2010). Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 673–688. doi:10.1037/a0016888
- Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon: “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Nova Science.
- Hammond, E. J., & Green, D. W. (1982). Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 67–82. doi:10.1037/h0081211
- Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171–216. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0755
- Levi, D. M. (2008). Crowding—an essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research, 48, 635–654. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009
- Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 724–738.10.1037/0096-1523.8.5.724
- Nandy, A. S., & Tjan, S. T. (2012). Saccade-confounded image statistics explain visual crowding. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 463–469. doi:10.1038/nn.302
- Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 12. doi:10.1167/4.12.12
- Pitchford, N. J., Ledgeway, T., & Masterson, J. (2008). Effect of orthographic processes in letter position encoding. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 97–116.10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00363.x
- Tydgat, I., & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480–498. doi:10.1037/a0013027
- Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243. doi:10.3758/BF03196158
- Whitney, C., & Marton, Y. (2013). The SERIOL2 model of orthographic processing. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237065841_The_SERIOL2_Model_of_Orthographic_Processing
- Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011).Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 160–168. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005