Examining eye movements in visual search through clusters of objects in a circular array

REFERENCES

• Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115–147. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drieghe, D. (2011). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 839–855). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239–1249. doi:10.1080/17470210701467953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donk, M., & van Zoest, W. (2008). Effects of salience are short-lived. Psychological Science, 19, 733–739. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02149.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617–631. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00218-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, J. M., Brown, V., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2001). Saccade target selection in visual search: The effect of information from the previous fixation. Vision Research, 41(1), 87–95. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00236-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82(1), B1–B14. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00138-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Malcolm, G. L., & Schandl, C. (2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 850–856. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, I. T. C., & Erkelens, C. J. (1999). Peripheral vision and oculomotor control during visual search. Vision Research, 39, 1567–1575. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00213-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2004). Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 104–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153–168. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12–35. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Reichle, E. D., & Gao, D.-G. (2013). Using reinforcement learning to examine dynamic attention allocation during reading. Cognitive Science, 37, 1507–1540. doi:10.1111/cogs.12027.
   Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16(1), 149–157. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research, 28, 1107–1118. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66(2), B25–B33. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuthmann, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2012). Using CRISP to model global characteristics of fixation durations in scene viewing and reading with a common mechanism. Visual Cognition, 20, 457–494. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.670142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuthmann, A., Smith, T. J., Engbert, R., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). CRISP: A computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychological Review, 117, 382–405. doi:10.1037/a0018924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. E. (1978). Picture processing during recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 284–293. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52(1), 1–56. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Sereno, S., & Raney, G. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188–1200. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1290–1301. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, G. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–280. doi:10.1037/h0027768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reichle, E. D. (2011). Serial attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 767–786). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115–119. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in non-reading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. Psychological Review, 119, 155–185. doi:10.1037/a0026473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 1–21. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177–206. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (in press). Re-thinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N + 2 preview effects. Visual Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 194–214. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trukenbrod, H. A., & Engbert, R. (2007). Oculomotor control in a sequential search task. Vision Research, 47, 2426–2443. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trukenbrod, H. A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Eye movements in a sequential scanning task: Evidence for distributed processing. Journal of Vision, 20, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vanyukov, P. M., Warren, T., Wheeler, M. E., & Reichle, E. D. (2012). The emergence of frequency effects in eye movements. Cognition, 123, 185–189. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2005). The effects of salience on saccadic target selection. Visual Cognition, 12, 353–375. doi:10.1080/13506280444000229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 746–759. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59–85. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(70)90005-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. G. (1967). The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. Acta Psychologica, 27, 355–360. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90080-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Searching for an O in an array of Cs: Eye movements track moment-to-moment processing in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 372–381. doi:10.3758/BF03193758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research, 36, 2177–2187. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00300-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115, 787–835. doi:10.1037/a0013118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar