Task-dependent sensitisation of perceptual and semantic processing during visual search for words

REFERENCES

• Adams, S. C., & Kiefer, M. (2012). Testing the attentional boundary conditions of subliminal semantic priming: The influence of semantic and phonological task sets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 241. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
   Google Scholar
• Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 937–948. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Worschech, F. (2010). Attentional capture by masked colour singletons. Vision Research, 50, 2015–2027. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, H. A., Van der Meij, M., & Kutas, M. (2013). An electrophysiological analysis of contextual and temporal constraints on parafoveal word processing. Psychophysiology, 50(1), 48–59. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01489.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, I., & Pecher, D. (2008). Word recognition is affected by the meaning of orthographic neighbours: Evidence from semantic decision tasks. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 375–393. doi:10.1080/01690960701527317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozon, F., & Carbonnel, S. (1996). Influence du voisinage orthographique sur l'identification des mots et des pseudo-mots [Orthographic neighbourhood effect in word and pseudo-word recognition]. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 6, 219–237.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. S., Roberts, M. A., & Besner, D. (2001). Semantic processing in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domain specificity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 778–784. doi:10.3758/BF03196217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V. (1981). Visual and semantic effects in a serial word classification task. Current Psychological Research, 1, 153–161. doi:10.1007/BF03186726
   Google Scholar
• Bundesen, C., Kyllingsbaek, S., Houmann, K. J., & Jensen, R. M. (1997). Is visual attention automatically attracted by one's own name? Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 714–720. doi:10.3758/BF03206017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2009). Semantic word priming in the absence of eye fixations: Relative contributions of overt and covert attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(1), 51–56. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 857–871. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic memory. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dampuré, J., Ros, C., Rouet, J.-F., & Vibert, N. (2012). How word familiarity facilitates visual search for verbal material. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 271–288. doi:10.1002/acp.1821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosher, B. A., Han, S., & Lu, Z.-L. (2010). Information-limited parallel processing in difficult heterogeneous covert visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1128–1144. doi:10.1037/a0020366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. R., Pashler, H. E., & Coburn, P. (2004). Moray revisited: High-priority affective stimuli and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(1), 1–31. doi:10.1080/02724980343000107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heil, M., Rolke, B., & Pecchinenda, A. (2004). Automatic semantic activation is no myth. Psychological Science, 15, 852–857. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00766.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417–429. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., & Chard, J. (1978). Semantic effects in visual word detection with visual similarity controlled. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 290–298. doi:10.3758/BF03199712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938–950. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00129-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-M., Baddeley, A., & Young, A. W. (2008). Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 328–339. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Olivers, C. N. L., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 137, 138–150. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Martens, U. (2010). Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 464–489. doi:10.1037/a0019561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léger, L., Boumlak, H., & Tijus, C. (2008). Basety: extension et typicalité des exemplaires pour 21 catégories d'objets [BASETY: Extension and typicality of examples in 21 categories of objects]. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 223–232. doi:10.1037/a0012885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léger, L., Ros, C., Rouet, J.-F., & Vibert, N. (2008). Distractor words that are visually similar to each other, but not to the target word, do not attract gaze more than filler words during the visual search for words defined by a semantic clue. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• Léger, L., Rouet, J.-F., Ros, C., & Vibert, N. (2012). Orthographic versus semantic matching in visual search for words within lists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(1), 32–43. doi:10.1037/a0026111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léger, L., Tijus, C., & Baccino, T. (2005). La discrimination visuelle et sémantique: pour la conception ergonomique du contenu de sites web [Visual and semantic discriminability: For web site content ergonomic design]. Revue d'Interaction Homme-Machine, 6, 81–106. Retrieved from http://europia.org/RIHM/V6N1/5-RIHM-Article%20Leger%20et%20al%20PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Léger, L., Tijus, C., & Baccino, T. (2006). Disposition spatiale et détection de mots [Spatial layout and words detection]. Le Travail Humain, 69, 349–377. doi:10.3917/th.694.0349
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), 113–138. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., & Beller, H. K. (1965). Searching through word lists. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 349–358. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1965.tb00977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 516–524. doi:10.3758/BF03195598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ojanpää, H., Näsänen, R., & Kojo, I. (2002). Eye movements in the visual search of word lists. Vision Research, 42, 1499–1512. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00077-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2011). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 245–248. doi:10.3758/BF03212426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Using E-Z reader to simulate eye movements in non-reading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. Psychological Review, 119, 155–185. doi:10.1037/a0026473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodd, J. M. (2004). When do leotards get their spots? Semantic activation of lexical neighbors in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 434–439. doi:10.3758/BF03196591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. C., Bentin, S., & Spalek, T. M. (2001). Attention constraints of semantic activation during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1289–1298. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top–down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248–261. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, T. L., & Gilden, D. L. (2007). Parallel and serial processes in visual search. Psychological Review, 114(1), 71–103. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourrette, G. (1979). Tables catégorielles. Normes de production dans 30 catégories [Category tables – Production norms for 30 categories] (Research Report). Poitiers (France): Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Psychologie (ERA 797).
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2010). Awareness of the saccade goal in oculomotor selection: Your eyes go before you know. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 861–871. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, P., & Kellas, G. (1984). Processing category terms in context: Instantiation and the structure of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 95–103. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the Feature Integration Model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). Opinion: What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501. doi:10.1038/nrn1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., Võ, M. L.-H., Evans, K. K., & Greene, M. R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 77–84. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115, 787–835. doi:10.1037/a0013118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar