On the time-course of adjacent and non-adjacent transposed-letter priming

REFERENCES

• American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006). Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 23, 107–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of TL confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775–800. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S., & O'Dowd, D. (1958). A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language and Speech, 1, 98–101. doi:10.1177/002383095800100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Molinaro, N. (2009). Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2659–2670. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225–241. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90136-1
   Google Scholar
• Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 183–200. doi:10.1080/01690960701579839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi:10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Grainger, J., Hernández, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2012). Differential sensitivity of letters, numbers, and symbols to character transpositions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1610–1624. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S., Charny, J., & McCloskey, M. (2011). Both-edges representation of letter position in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1083–1089. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0160-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S., McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2010). Representation of letter position in spelling: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 115, 466–490. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Orza, J., Perea, M., & Muñoz, S. (2010). Are transposition effects specific to letters? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1603–1618. doi:10.1080/17470210903474278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–600. doi:10.1037/a0012667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35. doi:10.1080/01690960701578013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009a). An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes. Brain Research, 1270, 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009b). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128–156. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–23). New York: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mind raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58–59. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   Google Scholar
• Hannagan, T., & Grainger, J. (2012). Protein analysis meets visual word recognition: A case for string kernels in the brain. Cognitive Science, 36, 575–606. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01236.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannagan, T., & Grainger, J. (2014). Orthographic learning and the developmental transposed-letter effect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. R., & Wood, C. C. (1976). The ε-adjustment procedure for repeated measures analysis of variance. Psychophysiology, 13, 277–278. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb00116.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ktori, M., Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Holcomb P. J. (2012). The “electrophysiological sandwich”: A method for amplifying ERP priming effects. Psychophysiology, 49, 1114–1124. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01387.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 618–639. doi:10.1037/a0015278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massol, S., Duñabetia, J. A., Carreiras, M., & Grainger, J. (2013). Evidence for letter-specific position coding mechanisms. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e68460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516–524. doi:10.3758/BF03195598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327–357. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254–271. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78–92. doi:10.3758/BF03196953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do TL similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600–1613. doi:10.1080/17470210500298880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the TL effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69–92. doi:10.1080/01690960701578146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). TL priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 397–406. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? TL confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829–841. doi:10.3758/BF03196438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? TL similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 301–314. doi:10.3758/BF03206493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, J. P., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time-course of letter perception: A masked priming ERP investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 674–681. doi:10.3758/BF03193980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192–193. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D., Doyle, M. C., & Wells, T. (1995). Word and nonword repetition within- and across-modality: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 209–227. doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. doi:10.1080/01690960344000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutter, D. J. L. G., Leitner, C., Kenemans, J. L., & van Honk, J. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of cortico-subcortical interaction: A cross-frequency spectral EEG analysis. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 381–387. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, S. J., Fize, D., Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522. doi:10.1038/381520a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243. doi:10.3758/BF03196158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Lété, B., & Grainger, J. (2014). Orthographic and phonological contributions to reading development: Tracking developmental trajectories using masked priming. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1026–1036. doi:10.1037/a0035187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar