Quantifying the reliance on different sublexical correspondences in German and English

REFERENCES

• Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565–575. doi:10.3758/BF03202439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Scarratt, D. R. (1998). Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1052–1086. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Seva, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral, and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 180–196. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. D., & Deavers, R. P. (1999). Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 208–242. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2004). Stress regularity or consistency? Reading aloud Italian polysyllables with different stress patterns. Brain and Language, 90, 318–325. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00444-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J., & Zhu, C. (1995). A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 16, 1190–1208. doi:10.1137/0916069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., & Besner, D. (1981). This and THAP – Constraints on the pronunciation of new, written words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 375–396. doi:10.1080/14640748108400799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S., & Harrington, J. (2001). Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system. Speech Communication, 33(1), 61–77. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00069-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory & Cognition, 28, 1269–1276. doi:10.3758/BF03211827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, F., & Palethorpe, S. (2007). Australian English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37, 341–350. doi:10.1017/S0025100307003192
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, L. G., Castro, S. L., Defior, S., Seymour, P. H., Baillie, S., Leybaert, J., … Francisca Serrano. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, 35(1), 116–124. doi:10.3758/BF03195503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Behme, C., Beveridge, M. E., Bak, T. H., Bowers, J. S., Coltheart, M. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674–691. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (2002). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams, and Stuart (2002). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(1), 47–57. doi:10.1006/jecp.2002.2673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & De Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., Porpodas, C., & Wheelwright, S. (1997). Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 273–292. doi:10.1007/BF03172876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235–247. doi:10.1017/S0142716403000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grömping, U. (2010). Inference with linear equality and inequality constraints using R: The package ic.infer. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(1), 2–28. doi:10.1006/jecp.2002.2670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jared, D. (2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 723–750. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerek, E., & Niemi, P. (2012). Grain-size units of phonological awareness among Russian first graders. Written Language & Literacy, 15(1), 80–113. doi:10.1075/wll.15.1.05ker
   Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monfort, A. (1995). Statistics and econometric models (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., & Behrmann, M. (1997). Frequency and consistency effects in a pure surface dyslexic patient. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1217–1231. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: A new attempt at an old interpretation. In K. Patterson, J. Morton, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 1217–1231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., Braun, M., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Rules versus statistics in reading aloud: New evidence on an old debate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 798–812. doi:10.1080/09541440902978365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Palethorpe, S., & Castles, A. (2012). Nonword reading: Comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1268–1288. doi:10.1037/a0026703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Gerakaki, S., & Alexandri, S. (2006). Lexical and default stress assignment in reading Greek. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 418–432. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robidoux, S., & Pritchard, S. C. (2014). Hierarchical clustering analysis of reading aloud data: A new technique for evaluating the performance of computational models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 267. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00267
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ševa, N., Monaghan, P., & Arciuli, J. (2009). Stressing what is important: Orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(1), 21–39. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1992). The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004–1014. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Radeau, M. (1995). The influence of the phonological characteristics of a language on the functional units of reading: A study in French. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 49, 330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Bick, S. (2003). Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models. Cognition, 88(1), 49–78. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00003-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Kessler, B., Zevin, J. D., Bick, S., & Davis, M. (2006). Influence of consonantal context on the reading of vowels: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(1), 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography (Vol. 82). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 413–430. doi:10.1080/09541440050114570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12, 379–384. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169–193. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00139-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for/u/? a database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, 29, 600–618. doi:10.3758/BF03210615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M. (2010). The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 836–860. doi:10.1080/09541440903435621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar