REFERENCES
- Abrahamse, E. L., Ruitenberg, M. F. L., De Klein, E., & Verwey, W. B. (2013). Control of automated behavior: Insights from the discrete sequence production task. Frontier in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 82. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00082
- Abrahamse, E. L., & Verwey, W. B. (2008). Context dependent learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 72, 397–404. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0123-5
- Anderson, T., Wright, D. L., & Immink, M. A. (1998). Contextual dependencies during perceptual-motor skill performance: Influence of task difficulty. Memory, 6, 207–221. doi:10.1080/741942069
- Beesley, T., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2010). The effect of predictive history on the learning of sub-sequence contingencies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 108–135. doi:10.1080/17470210902831767
- Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2008). Effector-related sequence learning in a bimanual-bisequential serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 72, 138–154. doi:10.1007/s00426-006-0097-8
- Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2009). Integrated and independent learning of hand-related constituent sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 890–904. doi:10.1037/a0015505
- D'Angelo, M. C., Jiménez, L., Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). On the specificity of sequential congruency effects in implicit learning of motor and perceptual sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 69–84. doi:10.1037/a0028474
- D'Angelo, M. C., Milliken, B., Jiménez, L., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Implementing flexibility in automaticity: Evidence from context-specific implicit sequence learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 64–81. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.002
- D'Angelo, M. C., Milliken, B., Jiménez, L., & Lupiáñez, J. (2014). Re-examining the role of context in implicit sequence learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 172–193. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.005
- Goschke, T., & Bolte, A. (2012). On the modularity of implicit sequence learning: Independent acquisition of spatial, symbolic, and manual sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 284–320. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.04.002
- Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316–339. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.316
- Ludwig, C. J. H., Farrell, S., Ellis, L. A., Hardwicke, T. E., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2012). Context-gated statistical learning and its role in visual-saccadic decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 150–169. doi:10.1037/a0024916
- Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 585–594. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.585
- Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581–597. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.581
- Remillard, G. (2008a). Implicit learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order adjacent and nonadjacent sequential dependencies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 400–424. doi:10.1080/17470210701210999
- Remillard, G. (2008b). A program for generating randomized simple and context-sensitive sequences. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 484–492. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.2.484
- Remillard, G. (2010). Implicit learning of fifth- and sixth-order sequential probabilities. Memory & Cognition, 38, 905–915. doi:10.3758/MC.38.7.905
- Remillard, G., & Clark, J. M. (2001). Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 483–498. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.483
- Ruitenberg, M. F. L., Abrahamse, E. L., De Kleine, E., & Verwey, W. B. (2012). Context-dependent motor skill: Perceptual processing in memory-based sequence production. Experimental Brain Research, 222, 31–40. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3193-6
- Schmidtke, V., & Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53–71. doi:10.1007/BF00419680
- Schumacher, E. H., & Schwarb, H. (2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 270–290. doi:10.1037/a0015378
- Shin, J. C., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Concurrent learning of temporal and spatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 445–457. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.445
- Stephan, M. A., Meier, B., Orosz, A., Cattapan-Ludewig, K., & Kaelin-Lang, A. (2009). Interference during the implicit learning of two different motor sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 196, 253–261. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1845-y
- Verwey, W. B., & Abrahamse, E. L. (2012). Distinct modes of executing movement sequences: Reacting, associating, and chunking. Acta Psychologica, 140, 274–282. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.007
- Wright, D. L., Shea, C. H., Li, Y., & Whitacre, C. (1996). Contextual dependencies during perceptual-motor skill acquisition: Gone but not forgotten! Memory, 4, 91–108. doi:10.1080/741940665