The role of vowel formant frequencies and duration in the perception of foreign accent

References

• Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan, L. M., & Hansen, J. H. L. (1997). A study of temporal features and frequency characteristics in American English foreign accent. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 28–40. doi:10.1121/1.419608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assgari, A. (2014). Effects of temporal parameters on the perception of foreign accent in synthesized speech (Master’s thesis). James Madison University.
   Google Scholar
• Bashford, J. A., Riener, K. R., & Warren, R. M. (1992). Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 211–217. doi:10.3758/BF03212247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 1600–1610. doi:10.1121/1.1603234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Computer program]. (Version Retrieved May 1, 2009, from http://www.praat.org/).
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R. (1995). A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(3), 1916–1924. doi:10.1121/1.412064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 421–428. doi:10.1121/1.1913594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16. doi:10.1017/S0272263197001010
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 692–707. doi:10.1121/1.391256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721. doi:10.1121/1.391257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 379–412. doi:10.1007/s10936-008-9097-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand, J. M., Clark, M. J., & Houde, R. A. (2000). Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 3013–3022. doi:10.1121/1.1323463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111. doi:10.1121/1.411872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 64, 459–489. doi:10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, C. J., & Koet, T. (1993). The evaluation of accent in the English of Dutchmen. Language Learning, 43, 69–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magen, H. S. (1998). The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 381–400. doi:10.1006/jpho.1998.0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M. J. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36, 39–66. doi:10.1177/002383099303600103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995a). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995b). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306. doi:10.1177/002383099503800305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perception Research Systems. (2007). Paradigm. Retrieved from http://www.paradigmexperiments.com
   Google Scholar
• Porretta, V., Kyröläinen, A.-J., & Tucker, B. V. (2015). Perceived foreign accentedness: Acoustic distances and lexical properties. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 2438–2451. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0916-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. (2000). He who hesitates: Hesitation phenomena as quality control in speech production, obstacles in non-native speech perception. Journal of Education, 182(3), 67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Riazantseva, A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 497–526. doi:10.1017/S027226310100403X
   Google Scholar
• Schairer, K. E. (1992). Native speaker reaction to non-native speech. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 309–319. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb07001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3306–3316. doi:10.1121/1.3101452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajima, K., Port, R., & Dalby, J. (1997). Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24. doi:10.1006/jpho.1996.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarone, E. E. (1980). Some influences on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 18, 139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, L. (2000). Second language learner speech production. Studia Linguistica, 54, 288–297. doi:10.1111/1467-9582.00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 905–916. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijngaarden, S. J. (2001). Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech. Speech Communication, 35, 1–2. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00098-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijngaarden, S. J., Steeneken, H. J. M., & Houtgast, T. (2002). Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 3004–3013. doi:10.1121/1.1512289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, T., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2007). Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, 64, 2–3. doi:10.1159/000107913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, C. I., & Harrington, J. (1999). Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 458–468. doi:10.1121/1.427069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar