Syntactic agreement attraction reflects working memory processes

References

• Allen, C. M., Martin, R. C., & Martin, N. (2012). Relations between short-term memory deficits, semantic processing, and executive function. Aphasiology, 26(3–4), 428–461. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.617436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Kuminiak, F. (2007). Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 65–85. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Lewis, R. (2007). A new theory and computational model of working memory in sentence production: Agreement errors as failures of cue-based retrieval. Paper presented at the 20th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. La Jolla, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barde, L. H. F., Schwartz, M. F., Chrysikou, E. G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). Reduced short-term memory span in aphasia and susceptibility to interference: Contribution of material-specific maintenance deficits. Neuropsychologia, 48(4), 909–920. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. H., Martin, R. C., Hamilton, A. C., & Beauchamp, M. S. (2012). Multisensory speech perception without the left superior temporal sulcus. NeuroImage, 62(3), 1825–1832. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., Eberhard, K. M., & Cutting, J. C. (2004). Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 251–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., Nicol, J., & Cutting, J. C. (1999). The ties that bind: Creating number agreement in speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 330–346. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K. (1995). Producing agreement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 56–61. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10771165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K. (2011). How much correction of syntactic errors are there, anyway? Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(6), 322–335. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00283.x
   Google Scholar
• Bock, K. & Eberhard, K. M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57–99. doi:10.1080/01690969308406949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Some attractions of verb agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 83–128. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Middleton, E. L. (2011). Reaching agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29(4), 1033–1069. doi:10.1007/s11049-011-9148-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckner, R. L. (2004). Memory and executive function in aging and AD: Multiple factors that cause decline and reserve factors that compensate. Neuron, 44, 195–208. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., & Butterworth, B. (1985). Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in a highly literate subject: A developmental case with associated deficits of phonemic processing and awareness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 37(3), 435–475. doi:10.1080/14640748508400944
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., & Ali, M. (2009). Formal features in aphasia: Tense, agreement, and mood in English agrammatism. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 436–450. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25(2), 257–271. doi:10.3758/BF03204507
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Porter, S. (2010). Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(3), 245–260. doi:10.1080/02643294.2010.513967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section D), 12, 482–486. doi:10.1076/clin.12.4.482.7241
   Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M. (1997). The marked effect of number on subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 147–164. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M. (1999). The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject-verb agreement in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 560–578. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112(3), 531–559. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faroqi-Shah, Y., & Thompson, C. K. (2004). Semantic, lexical, and phonological influences on the production of verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 89(3), 484–498. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. A study in French written language. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47, 437–464. doi:10.1080/14640749408401119
   Google Scholar
• Francis, W. N. (1986). Proximity concord in English. Journal of English Linguistics, 19(2), 309–317. doi:10.1177/007542428601900212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Rizzi, L. (2006). Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition, 101(1), 173–216. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Soare, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Rizzi, L. (2010). Object interference in subject-verb agreement: The role of intermediate traces of movement. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 166–182. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (2002). Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(4), 371–404. doi:10.1080/01690960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, M. L., Martin, R. C., & Biegler, K. (2004). Semantic relatedness effects in conjoined noun phrase production: Implications for the role of short-term memory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2), 245–265. doi:10.1080/02643290342000528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56(3), 397–425. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2011). Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production. Cognition, 118(3), 377–397. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2013). Against structural constraints in subject-verb agreement production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 515–528. doi:10.1037/a0029005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2005). Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(1), 1–13. doi:10.3758/CABN.5.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. C., & Martin, R. C. (2007). Proactive interference in a semantic short-term memory deficit: Role of semantic and phonological relatedness. Cortex, 43, 112–123. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70449-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A. (2015). Structure modulates similarity-based interference in sluicing: An eye tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1839. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1), 181–204. doi:10.1080/01690960400002117
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H., & Huinck, W. J. (1999). Agrammatic production of subject-verb agreement: The effect of conceptual number. Brain and Language, 69(2), 119–160. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Explaining semantic short-term memory deficits: Evidence for the critical role of semantic control. Neuropsychologia, 49, 368–381. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, P., Van Doorn, A., & Kolk, H. (2007). Inflection and computational load in agrammatic speech. Brain and Language, 102(3), 273–283. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, S., Shalom, D. E., Sigman, M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2015). Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 133–149. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Science, 22, 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29, 375–419. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490. doi:10.3758/BF03210951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson, G., & Blake, B. (1981). Language typology: Cross-linguistic studies in syntax. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Shelton, J., & Yaffee, L. (1994). Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 83–111. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C. (2005). Components of short-term memory and their relation to language processing. Evidence from neuropsychology and neuroimaging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 204–208. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00365.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & Allen, C. M. (2008). A disorder of executive function and its role in language processing. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(3), 201–210; C 4–5. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1082884
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & Freedman, M. (2001). Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: Implications for speech production. Memory, 9(4–6), 261–280. doi:10.1080/09658210143000173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & He, T. (2004). Semantic short-term memory and its role in sentence processing: A replication. Brain and Language, 89(1), 76–82. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00300-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Miller, M., & Vu, H. (2004). Lexical-semantic retention and speech production: Further evidence from normal and brain-damaged participants for a phrasal scope of planning. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(6), 625–644. doi:10.1080/02643290342000302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3–29. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & Slevc, L. R. (2014). Language production and working memory. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 437–450). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 67–91. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00515-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., Gattei, C., Sigman, M., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 173. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Kan, I. P., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(6), 527–567. doi:10.1080/02643290903519367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, U., Hanne, S., Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Vasishth, S. (2016). A computational evaluation of sentence processing deficits in Aphasia. Cognitive Science, 40, 5–50. doi:10.1111/cogs.12250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427–456. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M., Martin, N., Grewal, R., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Rochon, E., Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and Language, 72(3), 193–218. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37(3), 440–479. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slevc, L. R. (2011). Saying what’s on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1503–1514. doi:10.1037/a0024350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, E. S., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2004). Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 49(1), 1–46. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2009). On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 308–327. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. (2004). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 355–370. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, D., Nicol, J., & Brehm, L. (2014). The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 195–215. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill, S. L., Jonides, J., Marshuetz, C., Smith, E. E., D’Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., … Swick, D. (2002). Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 109–120. doi:10.3758/CABN.2.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4), 740–759. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A. & Johns, C. L. (2012). Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 6/4, 193–211. doi:10.1002/lnc3.330
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A., Meyer, A. S., & Acheson, D. J. (2015). Effects of parallel planning on agreement production. Acta Psychologica, 162, 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., Semenza, C., & Fossella, S. (1994). How two aphasic speakers construct subject-verb agreement. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8(1), 19–25. doi:10.1016/0911-6044(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (1998). Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition, 68, B13–B29. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00041-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Zilli, T. (1999). Syntactic accuracy in sentence production: The case of gender disagreement in Italian language-impaired and unimpaired speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(6), 623–648. doi:10.1023/A:1023268911312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 356–381. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar