Effects of problem presentation durations on arithmetic strategies: a study in young and older adults

References

• Ardiale, E., Hodzik, S., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Aging and strategy switch costs: A study in arithmetic problem solving. L’Année Psychologique, 112, 345–360. doi: 10.4074/S0003503312003028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardiale, E., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Within-item strategy switching: An age comparative study in adults. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1138–1151. doi: 10.1037/a0027772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouazzaoui, B., Isingrini, M., Fay, S., Angel, L., Vanneste, S., Clarys, D., & Taconnat, L. (2010). Aging and self-reported internal and external memory strategy uses: The role of executive functioning. Acta Psychologica, 135, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Kadosh, R., & Dowker, A. (2015). The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deltour, J. J. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire Mill Hill de J. C. Raven: Adaptation française et normes comparées du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices (PM38). Manuel et Annexes. Braine le Château: Application des Techniques Modernes.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, D., Lemaire, P., & Dufau, S. (2008). Older and younger adults’ strategies in approximate quantification. Acta Psychologica, 129, 175–189. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog, C., Price, J., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Age differences in the effects of experimenter-instructed versus self-generated strategy use. Experimental Aging Research, 38, 42–62. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2012.637005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinault, T., Dufau, S., & Lemaire, P. (2014). Sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects during strategy execution: An event-related potential study in arithmetic. Brain and Cognition, 91(0), 123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinault, T., Lemaire, P., & Phillips, N. (2016). Aging and sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects: An EEG study in arithmetic problem solving. Brain Research, 1630, 144–158. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinault, T., Lemaire, P., & Touron, D. (2016). Aging effects in sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects during execution of memory strategies. Memory. doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1146300
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, B. G., & Touron, D. R. (2012). Mediator-based encoding strategies in source monitoring in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1352–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeFevre, J.-A., Greenham, L., & Waheed, N. (1993). The development of procedural and conceptual knowledge in computational estimation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 95–132. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P. (2016) Cognitive Aging: The Role of Strategies. Taylor & Francis, Routledge, Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., Arnaud, L., & Lecacheur, M. (2004). Adults’ age-related differences in adaptivity of strategy choices: Evidence from computational estimation. Psychology and Aging, 19(3), 467–481. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Brun, F. (2014). Effects of strategy sequences and response-stimulus intervals on children’s strategy selection and strategy execution: A study in computational estimation. Psychological Research, 78(4), 506–519. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0501-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Hinault, T. (2014). Age-related differences in sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects: A study in arithmetic problem solving. Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 253–262. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2010). Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 38(3), 322–332. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Leclère, M. (2014a). Strategy repetition in young and older adults: A study in arithmetic. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 460–468. doi: 10.1037/a0033527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Leclère, M. (2014b). Strategy selection in Alzheimer patients: A study in arithmetic. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36(5), 507–516. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.911248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 27, 364–382. doi: 10.3758/BF03211420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C., & Anderson, J. R. (1996). History of success and current context in problem solving: Combined influences on operator selection. Cognitive Psychology, 31(2), 168–217. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C., & Schunn, C. D. (1999). Task representations, strategy variability, and base-rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(2), 107–130. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.2.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luwel, K., Schillemans, V., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 753–771. doi: 10.1348/000712609X402801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1965). The Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale. London: H. K. Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(2), 207–236. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, V., Luwel, K., Bulté, I., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). The influence of previous strategy use on individuals’ subsequent strategy choice: Findings from a numerosity judgment task. Psychologica Belgica, 49(4), 191–205. doi:10.5335/pb-49-4-091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. W., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). Asymmetric switch costs as sequential difficulty effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1873–1894. doi: 10.1080/17470211003624010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (2007). Cognitive variability. Developmental Science, 10, 104–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00571.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Araya, R. (2005). A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 33, pp. 1–42). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(1), 71–92. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillan, J., Dufau, S., & Lemaire, P. (2015). How do we choose among strategies to accomplish cognitive tasks? Evidence from behavioral and event-related potential data in arithmetic problem solving. Mind Brain and Education, 9(4), 222–231. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., Burger, L., Taconnat, L., & Lemaire, P. (2015). Sequential difficulty effects during execution of memory strategies in young and older adults. Memory, 23(6), 806–816. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.928730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2012). Sequential difficulty effects during strategy execution: A study in arithmetic. Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 295–301. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2013a). Strategy sequential difficulty effects vary with working-memory and response–stimulus-intervals: A study in arithmetic. Acta Psychologica, 143, 113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2013b). Strategy sequential difficulty effects in Alzheimer patients: A study in arithmetic. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 83–89. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.753036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., & Lemaire, P. (2015). Numerical cognition during cognitive aging. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Uittenhove, K., Poletti, C., Dufau, S., & Lemaire, P. (2013). The time course of strategy sequential difficulty effects: An ERP study in arithmetic. Experimental Brain Research, 227(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3397-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos, T. (1992). Tempo Test Rekenen (TTR). Nijmegen: Berkhout.
   Google Scholar