280
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Enactment supports unitisation of action components and enhances the contribution of familiarity to associative recognition

, , &
Pages 932-947 | Received 05 Oct 2015, Accepted 21 Aug 2016, Published online: 09 Sep 2016

References

  • Aly, M., Knight, R. T., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2010). Faces are special but not too special: Spared face recognition in amnesia is based on familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3941–3948. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.005
  • Bader, R., Mecklinger, A., Hoppstädter, M., & Meyer, P. (2010). Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroimage, 50, 772–781. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.100
  • Bridger, E. K., Bader, R., Kriukova, O., Unger, K., & Mecklinger, A. (2012). The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400. Neuroimage, 63, 1334–1342. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.047
  • Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1981.tb00402.x
  • Curran, T. (2004). Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1088–1106. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.011
  • Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 1–21. doi:10.3758/BF03193807
  • Düzel, E., Vargha-Khadem, F., Heinze, H. J., & Mishkin, M. (2001). Brain activity evidence for recognition without recollection after early hippocampal damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 8101–8106. doi:10.1073/pnas.131205798
  • Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (1997). Strategy and consciousness in remembering subject-performed actions. Sprache & Kognition, 16, 94–109.
  • Engelkamp, J., & Perrig, W. (1986). Differential effects of imaginal and motor encoding on the recall of action phrases. Archiv für Psychologie, 138, 261–273.
  • Furr, R. M., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Evaluating theories efficiently: The nuts and bolts of contrast analysis. Understanding Statistics, 2, 33–67. doi:10.1207/S15328031US0201_03
  • Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 930–940. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.930
  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. doi:10.1007/BF02289823
  • Heil, M., Rolke, B., Engelkamp, J., Rosler, F., Ozcan, M., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-related brain potentials during recognition of ordinary and bizarre action phrases following verbal and subject-performed encoding conditions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 261–280. doi:10.1080/713752313
  • Hornstein, S. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2004). Memory for actions: Enactment and source memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 367–372. doi:10.3758/BF03196584
  • Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologieexpérimentale, 63, 124–138. doi:10.1037/a0014164
  • Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Yonelinas, A., Kroll, N. E., Lazzara, M., Röhm, D., & Gruber, W. (2001). Theta synchronization during episodic retrieval: Neural correlates of conscious awareness. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 33–38. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00024-6
  • Knopf, M. (1995). Memory for action events: Structure and development in adulthood. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 127–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kormi-Nouri, R. (1995). The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 337–363. doi:10.1080/09541449508403103
  • Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L. G. (2001). The motor component is not crucial. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action. A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 97–111). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Kriukova, O., Bridger, E., & Mecklinger, A. (2013). Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Brain and Cognition, 83, 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.07.006
  • Leynes, P. A., & Bink, M. L. (2002). Did I do that? An ERP study of memory for performed and planned actions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45, 197–210. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00012-0
  • Leynes, P. A., Crawford, J. T., & Bink, M. L. (2005). Interrupted actions affect output monitoring and event-related potentials (ERPs). Memory, 13, 759–772. doi:10.1080/09658210444000377
  • Leynes, P. A., Grey, J. A., & Crawford, J. T. (2006). Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for sensory-based action memories. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 193–202. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.04.003
  • Leynes, P. A., & Kakadia, B. (2013). Variations in retrieval monitoring during action memory judgments: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 189–199. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.01.004
  • Mayes, A., Montaldi, D., & Migo, E. (2007). Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.003
  • McDaniel, M. A., & Bugg, J. M. (2008). Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 237–255. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.237
  • Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565–582. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3750565
  • Nilsson, L. G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In F. I. M.Craik & E. Tulving (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Oken, B. S., & Chiappa, K. H. (1986). Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography. Annals of Neurology, 19, 493–494. doi:10.1002/ana.410190511
  • Opitz, B., & Cornell, S. (2006). Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: Insights from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1595–1605. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1595
  • Paller, K. A., Voss, J. L., & Boehm, S. G. (2007). Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 243–250. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.002
  • Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2007). Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review, 114, 188–201. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.188
  • Quamme, J. R., Yonelinas, A. P., & Norman, K. A. (2007). Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus, 17, 192–200. doi:10.1002/hipo.20257
  • Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia, 45, 412–424. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.022
  • Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition. Neuroimage, 39, 873–884. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.041
  • Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85–158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Roediger III, H. L., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Memory for actions: How different? In L. Bäckman & L. Nyberg (Eds.), Memory, aging and the brain–A festschrift in honour of LarsGöran Nilsson (pp. 24–52). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276
  • Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251–257. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004
  • Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 47–69. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2555
  • Ruxton, G. D., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testing. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 690–693. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn020
  • Senkfor, A. J. (2008). Memory for pantomimed actions versus actions with real objects. Cortex, 44, 820–833. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.03.003
  • Senkfor, A. J., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2002). Episodic action memory for real objects: An ERP investigation with perform, watch, and imagine action encoding tasks versus a non-action encoding task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 402–419. doi:10.1162/089892902317361921
  • Senkfor, A. J., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2008). Enactment versus conceptual encoding: Equivalent item memory but different source memory. Cortex, 44, 649–664. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.12.004
  • Smith, M. E. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 1–13. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.1
  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (2009). Decomposing the memory processes contributing to enactment effects by multinomial modelling. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 61–83. doi:10.1080/09541440701868668
  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., Mecklenbräuker, S., & Marie Thompson, E. (2006). Decomposing retrieval and integration in memory for actions: A multinomial modeling approach. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 557–576. doi:10.1080/02724980443000764
  • Thompson, B. (1994). Planned versus unplanned and orthogonal versus nonorthongonal contrasts: The neo-classical perspective. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–27). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., Fabiani, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: Event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychology and Aging, 14, 390–413. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.390
  • Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26, 1–12. doi:10.1037/h0080017
  • Von Essen, J. D. (2005). Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 315–321. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00461.x
  • Voss, J. L., Lucas, H. D., & Paller, K. A. (2012). More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 193–207. doi:10.1080/17588928.2012.674935
  • Wilding, E. L., & Ranganath, C. (2011). Electrophysiological correlates of episodicmemory processes. In S. J. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ERP components (pp. 373–396). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological review, 114, 152–176. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152
  • Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
  • Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(5), 622–643. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1028
  • Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E., Dobbins, I. G., & Soltani, M. (1999). Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 654–661. doi:10.3758/BF03212975
  • Zheng, Z., Li, J., Xiao, F., Broster, L. S., Yang, J., & Xi, M. (2015). The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: Evidence from event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95, 355–362. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.003
  • Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speaker louder than words? Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or as a result of a specific memory system? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action. A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 151–198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Zimmer, H. D., & Cohen, R. L. (2001). Remembering actions: A specific type of memory? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zimmer, H. D., & Ecker, U. K. (2010). Remembering perceptual features unequally bound in object and episodic tokens: Neural mechanisms and their electrophysiological correlates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 1066–1079. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.014

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.