The effect of feedback on children’s metacognitive judgments: a heuristic account

References

• Allwood, C. M., Jonsson, A.-C., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). The effects of source and type of feedback on child witnesses’ metamemory accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 331–344. doi:10.1002/acp.1071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. (2013). Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 41, 897–903. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0307-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 918–928. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowker, A. (2008). Individual differences in numerical abilities in preschoolers. Developmental Science, 11, 650–654. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00713.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Aging and deficits in associative memory: What is the role of strategy production? Psychology and Aging, 13, 597–607. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efklides, A., & Dina, F. (2004). Feedback from one’s self and from the others: Their effect on affect. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 179–202.
   Google Scholar
• Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 188–200. doi:10.1177/0146167205282152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311–318. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everson, H., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26, 65–79. doi:10.1023/A:1003040130125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurten, M., Lloyd, M. E., & Willems, S. (2016). Hearing “quack” and remembering a duck: Evidence for fluency attribution in young children. Child Development. doi:10.1111/cdev.12614
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geurten, M., Meulemans, T., & Willems, S. (2015). Memorability in context: A heuristic story. Experimental Psychology, 62, 306–319. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurten, M., Willems, S., Germain, S., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Less is more: The availability heuristic in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 405–410. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurten, M., Willems, S., & Meulemans, T. (2015). Beyond the experience: Detection of metamemorial regularities. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 16–23. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 101–121. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009a). The easily learned, easily remembered heuristic in children. Cognitive Development, 24, 169–182. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009b). The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 265–279. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., Schneider, W., & Nakash-Dura, M. (2001). The credibility of children’s testimony: Can children control the accuracy of their memory reports? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 405–437. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 219–224. doi:10.3758/BF03194055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609–622. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Rhodes, M. G. (2013). Feedback reduces the metacognitive benefit of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 1–13. doi:10.1037/a0032147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvavilashvili, L., & Ford, R. M. (2014). Metamemory prediction accuracy for simple prospective and retrospective memory tasks in 5-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 127, 65–81. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., Lipowski, S. L., & Merriman, W. E. (2011). Young children are not underconfident with practice: The benefit of ignoring a fallible memory heuristic. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13, 174–188. doi:10.1080/15248372.2011.577760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2009). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: The role of task experience in preschoolers’ recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 152–166. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, T., & Dowd, K. (2007). Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2011). People’s hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: Did they know it all along? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 437–448. doi:10.1037/a0021962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2012). Hypercorrection of high confidence errors in children. Learning and Instruction, 22, 253–261. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T., & Geraci, L. (2011). Training metacognition in the classroom: The influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 303–314. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9083-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., McEvoy, C., & Schreiber, T. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 402–407. doi:10.3758/BF03195588
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84–97. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3–8. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radeau, M., Mousty, P., & Content, A. (1990). Brulex. Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L’année psychologique, 90, 551–566. doi: 10.3406/psy.1990.29428
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roebers, C. M., Schmid, C., & Roderer, T. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children’s test performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 749–767. doi:10.1348/978185409X429842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21, 267–280. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheck, P., & Nelson, T. O. (2005). Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: Boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 124–128. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, H., Bjorklund, D. F., & Beck, E. F. (2007). The adaptive nature of children’s overestimation in a strategic memory task. Cognitive Development, 22, 197–212. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., LeBoeuf, R. A., & Nelson, L. D. (2010). The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: Do people adjust from provided anchors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 917–932. doi:10.1037/a0021540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. D. (1999). Use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic by children. Current Psychology, 18, 294–300. doi:10.1007/s12144-999-1004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, L. K. (2010). Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 255–262. doi:10.1037/a0017892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switzer, F. S., & Sniezek, J. A. (1991). Judgment processes in motivation: Anchoring and adjustment effects on judgment and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 208–229. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90049-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiede, K. W. (1996). The relative importance of anticipated test format and anticipated test difficulty on performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 901–918. doi:10.1080/713755673
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Overschelde, J., & Nelson, T. (2006). Delayed judgments of learning cause both a decrease in absolute accuracy (calibration) and an increase in relative accuracy (resolution). Memory and Cognition, 34, 1527–1538. doi:10.3758/BF03195916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2004). Echelle d’intelligence de Wechsler pour la période préscolaire et primaire: WPPSI-III. Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2005). Echelle d’intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants: WISC-IV. Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. F., & Anderson, U. (1989). Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 68–82. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90035-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yussen, S. R., & Levy, V. M. (1975). Developmental changes in predicting one’s own span of short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 502–508. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(75)90079-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar