Spatial reference frames and SNARCFootnote

*This work was part of the Ph.D. Thesis of Abeer Mourad. The findings have been presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science in Ottawa, Canada (June, 2015).

References

• Ansorge, U., & Wuhr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731–735. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00002-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fias, W., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43–54). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., Mills, R. A., & Shaki, S. (2010). How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain and Cognition, 72, 333–336. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial associations in numerical cognition—from single digits to arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 67, 1461–1483. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.927515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., Shaki, S., & Cruise, A. (2009). It takes just one word to quash a SNARC. Experimental Psychology, 56, 361–366. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., & Lammertyn, J. (2005). The hunt for the SNARC. Psychology Science, 47, 10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Lammertyn, J., Notebaert, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 122, 221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-Spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 180–190. doi: 10.1037/a0017688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M., Gashaj, V., Stahnke, A., & Mast, F. W. (2014). There is more than “more is up”: Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1401–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2012). Orienting numbers in mental space: Horizontal organization trumps vertical. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 65, 1044–1051. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.685079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in the parietal cortex. Nature Review Neuroscience, 6, 435–448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, Y.-H., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Wu, D. H. (2008). Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition, 106, 1441–1450. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 662–673. doi: 10.3758/BF03195857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F. & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, D., & Schwarz, W. (2007). Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1151–1161. doi: 10.3758/BF03193485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 32–45. doi: 10.1037/h0028566
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. l., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santens, S., & Gevers, W. (2008). The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition, 108, 263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with manual and saccadic responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 651–664. doi: 10.3758/BF03194909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328–331. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E. M., & Dehaene, S. (2014). The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 67, 1484–1499. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.897358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, B., Matlock, T., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Mental number space in three dimensions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2006a). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: A failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini, and Giraux (1993). Cortex, 42, 1069–1079. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70219-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G., Nuerk, H.-C., & Willmes, K. (2006b). Variability of the SNARC effect: Systematic interindividual differences or just random error? Cortex, 42, 1119–1123. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70223-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525.
   Google Scholar
• Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 166–190. doi: 10.1163/1568537054068660
   Google Scholar